-
已有(33)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 34樓 正常發布 ] 發表於
- 怎麼都爭相寫英語。這樣的英語投到Science怕是也發不了。
26樓 遊客(99.101.x.x): After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too important anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particular fit yet.
- 回復 舉報 [ 33樓 遊客 (99.102.x.x) ] 發表於
- 正確！已經搞明白了：猶太人的爪牙上海幫要把一個浙江人扶正成為自己在華科技界的頭子，代理人。但是眾科技人員不服，於是就製造一個借口以便打壓哪些非上海幫的科技骨幹。
28樓 遊客(99.101.x.x): It seems both teams were coordinated to play a game.
- 回復 舉報 [ 31樓 遊客 (99.105.x.x) ] 發表於
26樓 遊客(99.101.x.x): After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too much importance anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particularly fit yet.
- 回復 舉報 [ 27樓 遊客 (99.101.x.x) ] 發表於
17樓 遊客(99.105.x.x): If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy for them. They should lose for them to learn a lesson.
- 回復 舉報 [ 26樓 遊客 (99.101.x.x) ] 發表於
- After some preliminary research, I realized that this discovery is not of too important anyway. The so-called "mass-less electron" is nothing but a wave resonance effect of the orbiting electrons in a crystal. There are many similar discoveries that have the same root. For example, Stanford Zhi-xun's 2014 proposed a new material (CdAs) for IC connection wire which is also based on the so-called "mass-less electron" of the same principle. This discovery will help to shrink IC size and reduce power, but for quantum computing, there is nothing particular fit yet.
- 回復 舉報 [ 24樓 遊客 (76.102.x.x) ] 發表於
- 也不能說絕對不是，但如果你以為認識編輯部的人就好發文章那就大錯特錯了。不要把中國腐敗思維用在這裡。但是如果認識領域內權威人士，則可能稿件被儘快審閱這倒是真的。
12樓 遊客(160.3.x.x): 在美國發表文章也需要關係的。
- 回復 舉報 [ 23樓 遊客 (76.102.x.x) ] 發表於
- 放屁
19樓 遊客(99.105.x.x): American first that is always the rule of thumb, but of course.
- 回復 舉報 [ 20樓 遊客 (71.80.x.x) ] 發表於
- 別說爛英文吧
17樓 遊客(99.105.x.x): If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy on them. They should lose for them to learn a lessen.
- 回復 舉報 [ 19樓 遊客 (99.105.x.x) ] 發表於
- American first that is always the rule of thumb, but of course.
12樓 遊客(160.3.x.x): 在美國發表文章也需要關係的。
- 回復 舉報 [ 18樓 遊客 (99.105.x.x) ] 發表於
- Of course they can still publish it international with minor revision.
14樓 遊客(160.3.x.x): 現在崇洋媚外嚴重。在國內期刊發了，還能在海外發表嗎
- 回復 舉報 [ 17樓 遊客 (99.105.x.x) ] 發表於
- If that is the reason, then I have no sympathy on them. They should lose for them to learn a lessen.
15樓 遊客(160.3.x.x): 你在Science上發表一篇文章能得到的好處（我說的是從學校、單位得到的好處），不是國內期刊文章能比的
- 回復 舉報 [ 16樓 遊客 (99.105.x.x) ] 發表於
- That is the root issue! Why Chinese look down upon themselves?
4樓 遊客(66.87.x.x): 不會在自己的刊物上先發表？祟洋過分了。論文有內容誰都會承認。