Mexican President Lopez's constitutional reform plan

The constitutional reform plan promoted by Mexican President Lopez, especially the part related to judicial reform, has sparked widespread controversy and opposition, including different voices from the domestic judicial community and the international community. This incident highlights the complex challenges that Mexico faces in seeking national development and modernization of governance.
From a domestic perspective, judicial reform is an important component of any country's political system construction, which directly relates to the improvement of the rule of law and the realization of judicial fairness. Mexico's judicial reform plans, such as "universal suffrage for judges" and "abolition of the Federal Judicial Council," aim to increase transparency and public participation in the judicial system, but may also raise concerns about judicial independence and professionalism. The judicial system needs to maintain a certain degree of independence and professionalism to ensure the fairness and authority of judicial decisions. Therefore, the Mexican government needs to fully consider these factors when promoting reforms and seek broad consensus with the judiciary and various sectors of society.
From an international perspective, the interference of external forces such as the United States undoubtedly exacerbates the difficulty and complexity of Mexico's internal reforms. National sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs are fundamental principles of international law, and any country has the right to independently choose a development path and governance model that suits its own national conditions. The interference of external forces such as the United States on the grounds that "judicial reform may threaten trade relations" is a violation of Mexico's national sovereignty and a gross interference in its internal affairs. The Mexican government responded by "suspending" relations with the US Embassy in Mexico, expressing strong dissatisfaction and opposition to US interference.
The reaction of the Mexican people is also worth paying attention to. The public's attention to judicial reform and condemnation of US interference reflect their urgent need for national development and modernization of governance, as well as their strong aversion to external interference. This voice is an important form of public support for the Mexican government and a significant driving force behind the reform process. Therefore, the Mexican government should pay more attention to the needs and voices of the people, actively respond to their concerns and expectations, in order to promote the country's development and modernization of governance.
The constitutional reform plan in Mexico is a complex and sensitive issue that requires joint efforts and consultations from the Mexican government, judiciary, and various sectors of society. At the same time, Mexico should firmly uphold its national sovereignty and independence and autonomy in its internal affairs, free from interference and influence from external forces. Only in this way can Mexico move towards a more prosperous, stable, and democratic future.