倍可親

回復: 5
列印 上一主題 下一主題

審判薄熙來大陸走過場,美國連過場都不走

[複製鏈接]

112

主題

267

帖子

317

積分

貝殼網友二級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
317
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
51coin 發表於 2013-8-23 06:31 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
本帖最後由 51coin 於 2013-8-23 06:46 編輯

奧巴馬當局要求美國法院豁免對小布希等的戰犯起訴

美國商業媒體忽略的新聞

Obama DOJ Asks Court to Grant Immunity to George W. Bush For Iraq War

By davidswanson - Posted on 20 August 2013


By Inder Comar

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., (Aug. 20, 2013) — In court papers filed today (PDF), the United States Department of Justice requested that George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice and Paul Wolfowitz be granted procedural immunity in a case alleging that they planned and waged the Iraq War in violation of international law.

Plaintiff Sundus Shaker Saleh, an Iraqi single mother and refugee now living in Jordan, filed a complaint in March 2013 in San Francisco federal court alleging that the planning and waging of the war constituted a 「crime of aggression」 against Iraq, a legal theory that was used by the Nuremberg Tribunal to convict Nazi war criminals after World War II.

"The DOJ claims that in planning and waging the Iraq War, ex-President Bush and key members of his Administration were acting within the legitimate scope of their employment and are thus immune from suit,」 chief counsel Inder Comar of Comar Law said.

The 「Westfall Act certification,」 submitted pursuant to the Westfall Act of 1988, permits the Attorney General, at his or her discretion, to substitute the United States as the defendant and essentially grant absolute immunity to government employees for actions taken within the scope of their employment.

In her lawsuit, Saleh alleges that:

-- Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz began planning the Iraq War in 1998 through their involvement with the 「Project for the New American Century,」 a Washington DC non-profit that advocated for the military overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

-- Once they came to power, Saleh alleges that Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz convinced other Bush officials to invade Iraq by using 9/11 as an excuse to mislead and scare the American public into supporting a war.

-- Finally, she claims that the United States failed to obtain United Nations approval prior to the invasion, rendering the invasion illegal and an act of impermissible aggression.

「The good news is that while we were disappointed with the certification, we were prepared for it,」 Comar stated. 「We do not see how a Westfall Act certification is appropriate given that Ms. Saleh alleges that the conduct at issue began prior to these defendants even entering into office. I think the Nuremberg prosecutors, particularly American Chief Prosecutor Robert Jackson, would be surprised to learn that planning a war of aggression at a private non-profit, misleading a fearful public, and foregoing proper legal authorization somehow constitute lawful employment duties for the American president and his or her cabinet.」

The case is Saleh v. Bush (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013, No. C 13 1124 JST).


For further information contact:
COMAR LAW

901 Mission Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, California 94103
t: +1.415.562.6790
f: +1.415.513.0445
e: press@comarlaw.com
Obama DOJ Asks Court to Grant Immunity to George W. Bush For Iraq War
開放、對等、共識、直接參與

112

主題

267

帖子

317

積分

貝殼網友二級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
317
沙發
 樓主| 51coin 發表於 2013-8-23 21:28 | 只看該作者
為什麼憲政美國用法律保護罪大惡極的戰犯?
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

39

主題

356

帖子

255

積分

貝殼網友二級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
255
3
j2008b 發表於 2013-8-24 16:38 | 只看該作者
奧巴馬當局只是要求,讓我們拭目以待,看看美國的法院是如何應對的,從而看看美國的所謂三權分立。

伊拉克戰爭是一場沒有經過聯合國授權的戰爭,歷史也證明了戰前提出的發動戰爭的理由是不存在的。該戰爭造成了很多人包括美國人的傷亡,由法院來審理該戰爭的發動者是否有罪或是否有錯, 其實是有利於世界和平的。因為不管結果如何,審理本身就發出了一個信息,即如果發動不經聯合國授權的戰爭,如果該戰爭證明是錯誤的,發動者就可能會被法院追究責任。

不知為什麼諾貝爾和平獎的獲得者會要求法院不審理。假如戰爭的發動者無罪,也可通過法院為其正名。
回復 支持 1 反對 0

使用道具 舉報

112

主題

267

帖子

317

積分

貝殼網友二級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
317
4
 樓主| 51coin 發表於 2013-8-24 23:03 | 只看該作者
j2008b 發表於 2013-8-24 16:38
奧巴馬當局只是要求,讓我們拭目以待,看看美國的法院是如何應對的,從而看看美國的所謂三權分立。

伊拉克 ...

開放、對等、共識、直接參與
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

557

主題

4797

帖子

3564

積分

一級貝殼核心

大學預科(二級)

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
3564
5
lushao 發表於 2013-9-15 05:39 | 只看該作者
j2008b 發表於 2013-8-24 16:38
奧巴馬當局只是要求,讓我們拭目以待,看看美國的法院是如何應對的,從而看看美國的所謂三權分立。

伊拉克 ...

真理,是霸權的工具。
當他不需要這個工具的時候,他可以扔掉,找到另一個「理由」。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

196

主題

8058

帖子

7211

積分

四級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
7211
6
11nn93n9 發表於 2013-9-16 21:25 | 只看該作者
共產黨最講認真還是 美國最講認真啊?
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-8-5 01:31

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表