倍可親

回復: 2
列印 上一主題 下一主題

加爾文基督教要義(66)卷三第二十五章 論最後的復活

[複製鏈接]

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15043
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
追求永生 發表於 2010-1-20 02:54 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
第二十五章 論最後的復活
  保羅宣布說,公義的日頭基督「將死廢去之後,又藉著福音,將不能壞的生命彰顯給我們」(參提后1:10)。因此,我們因著信就得以「出死入生」(約5:24),「不再作外人,和客旅,是與聖徒同國,是上帝家裡的人了」(弗2:19),「他又叫我們與他的獨生子一同坐在天上」(弗2:6),一無所缺,享受完全的快樂。然而,也許我們在日常生活的掙扎之下仍多憂慮,好像基督的勝利並沒有結出什麼果實似的,所以,我們必須記得聖經上關於盼望的性質的教訓。因為我們是「盼望那所不見的」(羅8:24),而聖經在另一處說,「信是未見之事的確據」(來11:1);又說,當我住在肉身內的時候,我們「便與主相離」(林后5:6)。所以保羅又說:「你們是已經死了,你們的生命與基督一同藏在上帝裡面;基督是我們的生命,他顯現的時候,你們也要與他一同顯現在榮耀里」(西3:3,4)。那麼,我們現在所必須行的是:在今世自守,公義,敬虔度日,等候所盼望的福,並等候至大的上帝,和我們的救主耶穌基督的榮耀顯現」(多2:12,13),這樣,我們需要非常的忍耐,否則必因睏倦而退卻,或拋棄崗位。以上關於我們的拯救所提到的一切,都在指示我們提高心懷,仰望天庭,照著彼得所提示的,雖然我們沒有見過主,卻因信他,心中「有說不出來,滿有榮光的大喜樂,」直到我們得著「信心的果效」(彼前1:8,9)。因為這個緣故,保羅認為信徒的信心與盼望,是向著那「存在天上的盼望」(西1:5)的。當我們因此雙眼注視天上的基督,而沒有什麼地上的東西能夠阻止我們,叫我們不朝向所應許的福氣前進的時候,我們就可知道基督的那句許是應驗了:「你們的財寶在哪裡,你們的心也在哪裡」(太6:21)。這正是世上缺乏信心的原因;由於我們的萎靡不振,再沒有比跨過諸般阻礙,「向著標竿直跑,要得從上面召我來得的獎賞」更困難的了(參腓3:14)。在許多困擾我們的苦難以外,又加上了那世俗的嘲笑,叫我們的簡單頭腦大受打擊;當我們自動放棄世上的一切誘惑,而追求那隱藏未見的喜樂,我們似乎是在捕捉影子一般。總而言之,我們的上下左右都為猛烈的試探包圍著,若非拋棄世俗,專心於那距離相當遙遠的天上的永生,我們必將站立不住。只有那慣於不斷地默念永生復活的福氣的人,才能對福音有確切的進步。
  二、關於至善,乃是古時哲人所不斷辯論爭執的題目;然而除柏拉圖外,沒有人承認至善是在乎人和上帝的聯合。但是對這人神聯合的真性質,他卻茫然無知,這是不足為奇的,因為關於這個神聖的結合,他是完全不了解的。即使在今世逆旅中,我們也知道生命的那惟一和完全的喜樂,但它不斷地激勵我們的心意,直到我們因得到了完滿的果實而滿足。因此我說,基督的益處只有那些能提高心意,仰望復活的人始能欣賞。因此,保羅為信徒立定目標,他告訴我們,他是丟棄萬事,儘力向那目標奔跑,直到得著了(參腓3:8)。而這目標必吸引我們加倍奮力地向它直奔,否則,若使這世界佔有了我們的注意力,我們必因懈怠而遭受悲慘的處分。所以保羅以下面的標誌來表示信徒的特徵,「他們是天上的國民,並且從那裡仰望救主」(參腓3:20)。為要使他們的心思不得在這目標上搖擺,他把一切被造物都當作他們的朋儔。衰殘毀滅既然到處可見,他又告訴我們,天上地下萬事萬物都要更新。因為亞當的墮落既然把自然的完美秩序破壞了,所以,一切被造之物都因人的罪而淪於非常悲慘的奴隸中;這並非因為它們有了什麼知覺,只因它們自然而然地渴望著恢復它們所失去的那完全的地位。所以保羅說它們「嘆息勞苦,直到如今」(羅8:22),好使我們這些得著了聖靈初熟果子的人都以停留在敗壞中為恥,或以未能效法那無血氣者之代人受過為恥。為叫我們得著更有力的激勵,他稱基督的再臨為「我們的救贖。」誠然,我們得救的各方面都已經完成;但「基督既然一次被獻,擔當了多人的罪,將來要向那等候他的人第二次顯現,並與罪無關,乃是為拯救他們」(來9:28)。無論有什麼災難壓迫著我們,這拯救必將支撐我們,直到救恩的完全達成。
  三、但願這個題目的重要性增加我們的熱心吧。保羅的辯論是很合理的,他說,「若沒有死人復活的事」,整個福音便是虛妄;因為我們既然「每時每刻都站在危險之中,給眾人怨恨,責罵,甚至像羊一樣被屠殺,這樣,若我們只有今世的盼望,「就算比眾人都可憐」了(參林前15:13-17),而福音的威權,不但將在某一點墮地,而是在一切有關兒子的名份和救恩的成就上,都要失掉意義。這個題目既然是最緊要的,我們當謹慎,勿因時間的長久而生厭倦。因此,我等待到此處才來作簡單的說明,好使讀者們既接受基督為完全救恩的施賜者,就當學習更進一步,知道他是披戴天上的光榮和永生,這樣才能使全體信徒和元首基督結連;因為聖靈往往指他為我們復活的榜樣。那麼,那已經朽壞的身體,到了預定時候還能復活,這是一件很難相信的事!因此,許多哲學家雖然承認靈魂不滅,卻很少承認身體復活的。這一點雖不能作為他們的藉口,卻足以告訴我們,這復活的真理是很難為人的智力所了解的。為使信心勝過這大障礙,聖經供給了我們兩種幫助:其一是基督的例子,另一是上帝的全能。因之,每逢想到復活這一件事的時候,我們當想到基督,他曾取得了人的性格,同人一樣,在世完成了凡胎俗體的一生,卻得著不朽的生命,現在成為我們將來複活的保證。因為在那臨到我們的患難中,我們「身上帶著耶穌的死,使耶穌的生,也顯明在我們身上」(林后4:10)。要使基督從我們身上分開就不免使他的身體分裂,而那非但是不合理,也是不可能的。因此保羅說:「若沒有死人復活的事,基督也就沒有復活了」(林前15:13)。因為他認基督並不是為著他本身而受死,勝過死亡,並從死里復活;這一切都不過是從元首開始那在一切肢體上,按著秩序,所要漸次完成的。誠然,信徒不可能在各方面都和基督一樣。詩篇曾說過,「你必不叫你的聖者見朽壞」(詩16:10)。雖然這樣的信心是按照賜給我們的分量,也一部分屬於我們的,但那完全的成就,卻只有在基督身上可以看出,因為只有基督是得以恢復無瑕疵的身體。那麼,為要使我們確信能與基督在他那有福的復活里相契結,且滿足於這保證,保羅就明明肯定地說,他坐在天上,將於末日降臨審判世人,為的是要「將我們這卑賤的身體改變形狀,和他自己榮耀的身體相似」(腓3:21)。在另一地方,他表明上帝叫他的兒子從死里復活,並非為表彰他權能的一個榜樣,乃是要在信徒身上同樣發揮他的靈的能力,因此保羅稱這靈為「我們的生命」,這靈住在我們心裡,為的是要「使我們必死的身體又活過來」(羅8:10,11)。我不過是對那些有比較詳盡討論,而亦值得大事宣揚的題目,作一簡略的敘述;但我相信虔誠的讀者必能在這小範圍內得到建立信德的充分資料。基督的復活使我們可以和他分享永生。天父使他復活,因為他是教會的元首,而天父必不容他和教會分離。他是由聖靈的能力而復活的,這靈也是賜給我們的,為的是叫我們復活。總而言之,基督之復活乃是要證明「復活在他,生命也在他。」正如我們所說的,在基督復活這面鏡子中,我們看出了復活的一個生動影象,可以叫我們心中有了一個確據,只要我們不因長久的遲延而厭倦。因為我們不能以自己的意向來衡量時間,卻須耐性等候上帝按照祂所預定的時候,建立他的國度,因此保羅說「初熟的果子是基督,以後在他來的時候,是那些屬基督的」(林前15:23)。
  那麼,為要使我們對於基督的復活沒有疑問(因著基督的復活乃是我們的復活的基礎),他就以許多不同的方法證實了基督的復活。藐視者總是視福音所述說的歷史為兒戲。他們問:幾個婦女在驚惶中所傳出,後來才為那恐懼的門徒所證實的消息,會有什麼價值呢?基督為什麼不把他勝利的證據顯明在聖殿或公共場所呢?他為什麼不在彼拉多的面前長驅直入呢?為什麼不對耶路撒冷的祭司和居民顯現他的復活呢?世俗的人很少肯相信他自己所揀選的見證人。我的回答是:不問那開始時的證據是如何地被認為軟弱,然而那些起初精神沮喪的人,現在奔向基督的墳墓,一半是因為對基督的愛和他們的虔誠,一半是因為他們自己的不信,結果是他們不但親眼看見這復活的事實,也聽見天使所宣布的和他們親眼所看見的正是一樣,這一切都顯然是上帝所安排的。我們怎能懷疑那些人的見證呢?他們當剛聽到婦女們所傳的信息時認為是胡言,直待他們清清楚楚看見了真象始肯相信(路24:11)。至於一般人民和巡撫彼拉多,他們既然有了可以信服的充分證據而仍然不信,那麼,不給他們再看見基督,或別的異象,那是無可希奇的。墓門是封閉著,而且有兵丁看守,然而到了第三天,屍身不見了。守墓的兵丁受了賄賂,放出謠言,就是基督的門徒將它偷走了;這好像是說門徒有力量驅逐兵丁,或有了充分武裝,一向慣於作這種驚人的事。可是縱使兵丁沒有勇氣來拒抗他們,為什麼不追蹤他們,在人民的協助下,把他們捉幾個呢?事實是:彼拉多自己已見證了基督的復活;那安置在墓前看守墳墓的兵丁,由於他們的緘默,或由於他們的謊言,實際上,也已成為宣布基督復活這件事實的先鋒隊。同時,有天使大聲宣布,「他不在這裡,已經復活了」(路24:6)。他們所發出的天上光彩,顯然表示他們是天使,而非凡人。這以後若仍然留下什麼疑惑,也已為基督本身所解除了。他的門徒非只一次見到他,觸摸他,甚至擁抱他;而他們當時的不肯相信,正可以幫助我們,堅實我們的信心。他又在他們當中講說上帝國的奧秘,到了他們親眼看見他升天(參徒1:3,9)。基督的顯現不只為十一個門徒所看見,也「顯給五百多弟兄看」(林前15:6)。由於他之差遣聖靈,他不只是向我們證明他的永生,而且也證明了他的國度,正如他所預言的,「我去是與你們有益的;我若不去,保惠師就不到你們這裡來;我若去,就差他來」(約16:7)。保羅在往在大馬色去的路 上,不是因著一個死人的影響而匍匐於地,乃是他感覺到他所反對的那個人是具有至高能力的。由於另一原因,他向司提反顯現,就是為叫他因有生命的保證而勝過對死亡的恐懼。對這許多可靠的見證若竟拒絕不信,就不是缺乏信心,而是極端的悖逆和頑固了。
  四、我們已經說過,要證明復活,我們的心必須朝向於上帝的無限權能;保羅也以這一點簡單地教訓我們:「他要按著那能叫萬有歸服自己的大能,將我們這卑賤的身體改變形狀,和他自己榮耀的身體相似」(腓3:21)。那麼,這裡所指示我們的乃是一個不可測度的神跡,它的長闊高深,竭盡人的智能,都不能參透,我們若以自然常道來忖測它,那是非常不合理的。然而保羅仍從自然界中引伸一個例子,來證明那反對死人復活之道者的愚妄。他說:「無知的人哪,你所種的,若不死就不能生」(林前15:36)。他告訴我們種子是代表從死里復活,因為穀物是從子粒的腐爛而產生的。倘若我們能放眼觀察宇宙萬事萬物的奇奧,那麼,復活的事也就不難相信了。但是,我們應當記著,只有那心中充滿欽敬,且能將復活的光榮完全歸於上帝權能的人,才能相信來生的復活。
  以賽亞為這信念所激動,就呼喊說,「死人要復活,屍首要興起;睡在塵埃的,要醒起歌唱」(賽26:19)。他當處身逆境,即投靠生命的主上帝,正如詩人所說的,「人能脫離死亡,是在乎主」(詩68:20)。約伯也是這樣,當他的情形像死人一般,而不像活人,他仍然仰賴上帝的權能,好像是一個身體健壯的人,毫無疑慮地在仰望著那一天,說,「我知道我的救贖主活著,到末了必要站立在地上」(即表彰他的權能);又說,「我這皮肉滅絕之後,我必在肉體之內,得見上帝。我自己要見他,要親眼見他,並不像外人」(參伯19:25-27)。雖然有人對這些經文故作狡巧的解釋,好像是說,它們所指並非死人復活,可是他們畢竟證實了他們所想推翻的經文;因為一切虔誠的人,當他們在災難中希望得到安慰時,他們總是從死人復活的道理去追尋;這從以西結的一段話中可以表明出來。當猶太人民的復國希望幻滅,而他們以為他們復國的機會並不比死人從墳墓中走出來大些的時候,先知以西結在異象中看見原野中所充滿的骸骨,經上帝命令,立刻生筋長肉。這個喻言雖是要鼓勵以色列人,叫他們存復國的希望,但他此處卻借用死人復活的道理;這道理對我們也是信徒在世上所經驗到的一切拯救的特別模範。同樣,基督在宣布福音能賜予生命后,因為猶太人不信,立刻又補充說,「你們不要把這事看作希奇,時侯要到,凡在墳墓里的,都要聽見他的聲音,就出來」(約5:28,29)。那麼,讓我們效法保羅的榜樣,在現在的掙扎中奮發起來,相信那應許我們將來得生命的,「必能保全我所交付他的;」因此,我們可以誇耀說,「有公義的冠冕為我存留,就是按著公義審判的主到了那日要賜給我的」(提后1:12;4:8)。因此我們所受的一切苦難必都成為未來生命的指望;「上帝既是公義的,就必將患難報應那加患難給你們的人,也必使你們這受患難的人,與我們同得平安。那時,主耶穌同他有力的天使,從天上在火焰中顯現」(帖后1:6-8)。但我們必須記著他緊接著補充的話,「主降臨要在他聖徒身上得榮耀,又在一切信的人身上顯為希奇,」因為他們相信福音。
  五、雖然人應當常常究探復活的道理,但事實上他們顯然已拋棄了復活的道理,以死亡為萬事的終極,和人的最後的滅亡。當所羅門說:「活著的狗,比死了的獅子更強」(傳9:4),他是按照一般人的見解說的;他又說:「誰知道人的靈是往上升,獸的魂是下入地呢?」(傳3:21)這種極端的愚笨歷代可見,甚至深入教會;撒都該人竟公然主張沒有復活和靈魂必朽說(參可12:18;路20:27)。這種絕對的愚昧是不能原諒的,因為自然的本性常在那不信的人面前顯示一種復活的影子。為什麼神聖不可侵犯的習俗要埋葬死人呢?豈不是對來生的保證嗎?我們不能以此為原於錯誤,因為安葬的典禮是我們的虔誠祖輩所常遵守的;上帝也喜歡外邦人保留這種風俗,以便叫他們的痹麻無知,因著擺在他們面前的復活的影子,而有所感奮。雖然這典禮對他們不曾發生什麼良好的效果,然而我們思想到它的歸趨是很有用的;因為世人都連在一起承認一件他們所不相信的事,這是對不信者的一種嚴重打擊。但是撒但不只是叫世人心思麻木,好叫人將復活的信念和死人的屍體一齊埋葬了,且又杜撰種種謬說,來敗壞這復活的道理,使之完全消滅。且不提在保羅的時候,撒但就開始反對復活道理,在保羅之後不久,又有所謂千禧年派出現,將基督的統治限制於一千年。他們這種妄說是幼稚而不值得反駁的。他們引用啟示錄來支持他們的謬論,也不能得到什麼支持;因為啟示錄所提到的「一千年」(啟20:4)並不是指教會的永恆福份,乃是指教會在地上所將經歷的各種困難。但是聖經一致地宣布說,選民將有無窮的幸福,被棄絕之民將有無窮的刑罰。那麼,關於一切我們眼目所不能見,心意所不能測的事,我們必須因上帝話語的權威而相信,或則完全加以拒絕。那些對神的兒女們只指定一千年的來生福澤的,不自知他們對基督和他的國度,已加上了何等的侮辱。因為倘若神的兒女們未被賦予永生,也未曾被接納於永生的榮耀中,那麼,基督也就未曾享受榮耀,因為我們所要受的榮耀是與他的一樣。倘若他們的幸福是有終極的,那麼他們所依賴作為安全根據的基督的國度,也就是暫時的了。最後,這些人若非完全不知道神國的事,就是心懷惡意,存心悖謬,想推翻上帝的恩典和基督的權能;而這恩典和權能非等到罪惡被消滅,死亡被吞滅,永恆的生命完全建立,是不能完成的。有人以為把遭棄絕的人判定永刑,是把上帝估計得太殘酷了,然而這種愚妄,連盲目的人也都看得出來。主之拒絕那些不知感恩,不配分享他國度的人,難道這對他們有什麼不公平嗎?說他們的罪是暫時的,這我原也承認;但是上帝的威嚴和公義——那為人的罪惡所冒犯的——卻是永恆的。所以,他們因不義所受的處分是合理的。那麼,這處分豈非過重嗎?這一疑問未免是輕視神的威嚴,認為藐視神的威嚴,比一個靈魂的毀滅為無足輕重,這確是一種不可原諒的褻瀆。讓我們將這無稽之談拋開吧;不然,我們就似乎是把他們這些嘲笑譏誚之談,當作是值得反駁的了。
  六、在這些荒渺的意見之外,世人的悖謬好奇又加進了兩種意見。第一,有些人以為人是整個地死去的,以後靈魂和肉體俱將復活;第二,有的則承認靈魂的永生不滅,但假定他們是穿上了新的肉身,因此否認肉體的復活。關於第一點,我在前面論世人的創造時已經提到,這裡只要警告讀者,若將那按照著神的形像所造的靈,說成為一種容易消散的氣一樣,只在今生當人還活著的時候給人氣息,並以為到人死時,那作為聖靈的殿的身體就完全毀滅,這種說法是極嚴重的錯誤;總之,這是掠奪了人所藉以表示神性,人所以有永生的那一部分性格,甚至使身體的情形較靈魂的更為優越。但聖經上的主張卻與此大不相同,經上將身體當作一個住處,人死時就離開了它,因為聖經之估計人,乃以人和禽獸之間的不同為主。因此,彼得臨終前的時候說,「因為知道我脫離這帳棚的時候快到了」(彼后1:14)。保羅論到信徒,曾說:「我們這地上的帳棚若拆毀了,必得到神手所造,在天上永存的房屋。」又補充說,「曉得我們住在身內,便與主相離……所以願意離身體與主同住」(參林后5:1,8)。除非我們的靈魂在我們的身體死後仍然存在,那麼,那脫離身體而與上帝同在的是什麼呢?但希伯來書的作者排除了一切的疑惑說,我們是「來到被成全之義人的靈魂前」(來12:23),這話的意思是指我們與聖潔的祖輩在一起,他們雖然死了,仍然與我們保持同樣的虔誠,所以我們若非和他們結為一體,就不能成為基督的肢體,倘若靈魂離開身體后不能保持它的生存而享受榮華,基督就不會對那強盜說,「今日你要同我在樂園裡了」(路23:43)。有了這種不容否定的見證來支持我們,我們就當毫不遲疑地效法基督的榜樣,在我們死時將我們的靈交託給上帝;或者效法司提反,將靈魂交付給基督,因為基督稱為「靈魂的牧人和監督。」至於靈魂在今生和來世之間的處境,那過度好奇的追究既是不合理,也是無益的,許多人自尋煩惱地在議論靈魂那時所處的地位,要知道他們是否已經得著了天堂的光榮。其實要追究上帝所容我們知道的事理以外的那些不可知的事情,確屬愚笨和僭妄。聖經上所宣布的只是基督與人同在,接納他們進入樂園,在那裡可享安樂;同時,一切被棄絕的人的靈魂都受應得的刑罰,如斯而已,再沒有多說別的。那麼,哪一個師傅能夠對我們發現神所隱藏的奧秘呢?至於靈魂的住處問題,其追究也是徒然而毫無意義的,因為我們知道,靈魂並不像身體一樣之有體積。敬虔的靈的聚集被稱為亞伯拉罕的懷抱,這是教訓我們,當人世的旅程告終,我們將蒙那信眾之父亞伯拉罕的接納,與他一同分享信心的果實,這就夠了。至於目前,經上既然命令我們懇切地仰望基督的降臨,並告訴我們說,我們所等候的光榮冠冕必待那時候才能夠得到,讓我們滿足於上帝所指定給我們的範圍吧,就是曉得虔誠人的靈魂在辛勞的爭戰完畢之後,就離世而進入福樂之境,喜樂地靜候那應許的光榮果實,但那最後果效須待救主基督再來時始能成就。無疑的,那被棄絕的人的光景是與猶大書所說的一樣,他們被交給魔鬼,為鎖鏈所捆縛,直到被提出來接受那刑罰的宣判。
  第七及第八節、駁斥摩尼教派的復活論——從略
  九、還有一個更難的問題,那就是,復活既然是基督的特殊恩惠,如何能使不虔敬和為神所咒詛的人共享呢?我們知道,因著亞當的緣故,一切世人都被判於死亡(參羅5:12),而基督降世是為著「復活與生命」(參約11:25);但這豈是不分皂白地賜生命與一切世人嗎?若說那些不信者,在他們的頑固盲目中,也和那些虔誠敬拜上帝的人一樣,有了那隻靠信心才能得到的生命,這豈不是很不可能的嗎?但是很確定的,有些人的復活是為著要受審判的,有些人是要得生命的;基督要來「分別綿羊和山羊」(太25:32)。所以我的答覆是,我們不當以這事為希奇,類似的事我們在日常經驗中已見到了。我們知道,在亞當身上,我們失掉了承受全世界產業的權利,非但不得享受生命樹的果實,甚至平凡的食糧也無權利享受。那麼,上帝為什麼「使日頭照好人,也照歹人」(太5:45)呢?為什麼他對今世生活的恩惠很豐富地布施給一切的人呢?因此,我們見到,那本來屬於基督和他的肢體的,也同樣分給那些不敬不虔的人;這不是說他們有合法的占有權利,只不過是叫他們更加顯得不可原諒而已。因此,不虔敬的人往往於非常事上得到神的恩惠,遠超過虔誠的人所得到的,但是這種恩惠不過是加重了他們的罪戾。若有人反對說,復活和世上的飄浮的福祿是不能比擬的,我將回答說,當諸魔鬼最初與生命泉源的上帝分離時,他們原須受毀滅的處分,然而神的奇妙旨意安排了一個中道的辦法,讓他們在死亡中活著。所以,倘若不虔敬的人從死里復活,為的是要被拉到基督——那位他們現在拒絕接受為主和師傅者——的審判台前,就不必認為是怎樣不合理的一件事。因為倘若他們不被帶到審判主的面前,接受他們所招惹的,由於他們的叛逆所當承擔的無盡刑罰,僅僅為死所毀滅就算是很輕微的處分了。雖然我們必須堅持我們所已經說過,和保羅在腓力斯面前所說的,「無論善惡,死人都要復活」(徒24:15),可是經上往往把復活單獨歸給上帝的兒女,和天上的光榮連在一起;因為,嚴格地說,基督再來不是為毀滅世界,乃是為拯救世界。這就是信條上所以只提到蒙恩者的生命的原因。
  十、但是,「死被得勝吞滅」的預言既然必等到那個時候才能成就,那麼,讓我們記住,那復活的目的乃是永恆的福樂;復活的美妙,縱使盡一切人的語言也不能表達其最微小的一部分。因為,雖然經上明明告訴我們上帝的國是滿有光輝,喜樂,愉快和光榮的,然而這些話的真意義仍然超越乎我們的理解,若在謎中,直待那日到來,他要面對面地將他的榮耀顯現給我們。約翰說:「我們現在是上帝的兒女,將來如何,還未顯明;但我們知道主若顯現,我們必要像他;因為必得見他的真體」 (約壹3:2)。先知們因為不能用什麼言辭來表明那屬靈福澤的莊嚴品性,所以往往以具體有形的東西代表。然而,正因為對那福澤的任何模擬都足以在我們心中激發熱烈的願望,讓我們特別注意底下這一點吧:倘若上帝本身充滿了一切永不枯竭的幸福泉源,那些熱烈企望至善和完美幸福的人,就不能在他以外有所追求。這一教訓可在聖經上的好些地方見到。上帝曾對亞伯拉罕說,「亞伯拉罕你不要懼怕,我是你的盾牌,必大大的賞賜你」(創15:1)。大衛也有同樣的感覺,他說,「主是我的產業……用繩量給我地界,坐落在佳美之處」(詩16:5,6)。又說,「我必在義中得見你的面……得見你的形像就心滿意足了」(詩17:15)。彼得宣稱信徒蒙召「得與神的性情有份」(彼后1:4)。這如何可能呢?因為他「要在他聖徒的身上得榮耀,又在一切信的人身上顯為希奇……」(帖后1:10)。倘若主要叫被揀選的人分享他的光榮,能力和公義,甚至將他自己賜給他們,叫他們與主結合為一,那麼,讓我們記著,一切的幸福全都包括在這恩典中了。在我們對這一個默想有了長足進步之後,我們仍將承認我們所能想像到的,若與這莊嚴的奧秘相比較,仍甚卑微。因此,對於這一個題目,我們必須存謙抑之心,否則我們將忘記了自己的微弱本能,妄自高飛,以致為天上眩耀的光彩所覆壓。我們也知道,我們是如何地為一種無節制的慾望所催促,想知道比我們所當知道的更多,因此引起了種種不必要和有害的疑問。所謂不必要的意思,是指那些不能使人得到任何益處的問題。但第二類問題就更壞了,它們使人沉溺於敗壞的忖想中,因之我稱之為有害的。凡經上所教訓我們的,我們理當毫無疑問地接受;這教訓是:上帝在分配恩賜給世上的諸聖者時,既不曾叫一切人心中有同等的亮光,所以在天上施賞賜賜時,也將給予不同等分的光寵。當保羅說:「你們就是我們的榮耀和喜樂」(帖前2:19)時,他並非漫無分別地指一切人。主基督對門徒說「你們也要坐在十二個寶座上,審判以色列十二支派」(太19:28),也是如此,保羅知道上帝既以屬靈的恩賜充實世上聖徒的生命,也將在天上以榮耀裝飾他們,所以他毫無疑惑地認為主將按照他的辛勞,為他預備特別的冠冕。當基督對門徒稱讚他所付託他們的職分之尊嚴時,他也保證他們的獎賞是保留在天上的(參太5:12)。但以理也說:「智慧人必發光,如同天上的光;那使多人歸義的,必發光如星,直到永永遠遠」(但12 :3)。我們若查考聖經,就會知道,聖經不只是對一般信徒作永生的應許,而且是對每一個信徒作特別的應許。所以保羅說,「主必照他所行報應他」(提后4:14)。而基督的應許也證實了他的門徒將在永生中領受百倍的恩賜(參太19:29)。總而言之,正如基督以各樣恩賜來榮耀他在世上的身體,並漸次擴大,他也將在天上完成這榮耀。
  十一、正如一切虔誠人將同心一意接受這個說法,因為這是由聖經所充分證明的,同樣,在另一方面,他們將排除一切他們認為是障礙的深奧問題,不逾越那規定給他們的範圍。就我個人說,我不但約束自己不去探究那些無益的問題,而且認為當小心謹慎,對這類問題不隨便回答,以免鼓勵別人的虛浮思想。有些人渴慕那些虛無的知識,究問先知和使徒,或使徒和殉道者之間在天上有什麼不同的地位,有的追問那些結婚的人,和一生一世獨身的人有什麼不同的程度;總之,天上的每一塊石頭他們都要翻起來看個究竟。他們所追究的第二問題是,未來世界的恢復有什麼目的?因為上帝的兒女將不再需要那廣大無比的豐富中的任何東西,卻是像上帝的天使一樣,而天使的自由自在,不需要飲食,正可算是永福的象徵。我的答覆是:在將來的景況中,只要看見或知道這更新的天地,不必有什麼需要,我們即將感覺極端的愉快和甜蜜,而這種至高的喜樂,將遠勝過現世我們所有的一切。假設我們處在世界的極豐裕的地方,在那裡一切福樂都不缺乏;可是誰能有不為疾病所阻,以至於有時不能享受神所賜的豐富?誰能不因自己的無節制而間斷了此種享受?所以,只有在那清靜、純潔、和毫無缺陷的境界中——雖然對那能敗壞的生命毫無用處 ——才能有至完美的喜樂。有的人追問在更新的世界中是否連金質中的渣滓和雜質也都被除掉了,因為這與那完全的境界是不相容的。對於這一點,我在若干限度上同意,但我所希望的是同保羅一樣的,就是一切由罪而生的邪惡,都須加以補償,因為這罪使一切被造之物,都一同嘆息勞苦(羅8:22)。另一些人更追問,當人類不能再享受有後嗣的福氣時,還有什麼比這更好的景況呢?要解答這一點也是容易的。聖經對於代代相承的事是很稱讚的,因為神藉人類的繼續繁衍,使自然造化得以繼續不斷地前追。但在那完全的境界,情形就不同了。不小心的人容易為試探所擒,深入迷津,到了最終每個人都喜歡他自己的意見,造成了無窮的辯論。所以我們的最適切的態度莫如以底下的話為滿足:「如今彷彿對著鏡子觀看,模糊不清,到那時就要面對面了」(林前13:12)。很少人關心他們達到天國的道路,卻有許多人急欲知道,在時候未到之前,天國中的日子究竟是怎樣過的。一般說來,人都是遲鈍而不願意牽涉於衝突中的,然而卻喜歡描繪想像中的勝利。
  十二、關於神對被棄絕的人的嚴厲報復,沒有什麼適當的言語可以描述;他們的苦痛和刑罰,都藉著屬世的事物表達出來,例如黑暗,哀哭,切齒,不滅之火,不斷咬嚙人心的蟲等(參太8:12;可9:43;賽66:24)。無疑的,藉著這種說法,聖靈是要促進我們的敬畏之心,正如以賽亞書上所說:「原來陀斐特又深又寬,早已為王預備好了,其中堆的是火,與許多木柴,主的氣如一股硫磺火,使它著起來」(賽30:33)。這種描繪是要幫助我們認識惡人所遭受的凄慘景況,使我們注意到離開了上帝的人是處在何等災禍的景況中;此外,更叫我們知道,與神的威嚴為敵是無法逃避他的不斷的追索的。因為,第一,他的忿怒如同猛烈的火焰,凡碰著的必被毀滅。第二,一切被造之物都是神的審判的工具,凡主所忿怒的人,必將發現天地山海,禽獸萬物,有氣息和沒有氣息的,都好像發出極端的忿怒,要來攻擊他,都拿著武器來毀滅他。所以使徒保羅所說關於那些不信的人的話:「他們要受刑罰,就是永遠的沉淪,離開主的面前,和他的權能與光榮」(帖后1:9),並不是無足輕重的。當先知用具體的事物來激發人的恐懼時,他們所說的對於我們的遲鈍感覺言,雖非過分誇張,然而這些話確是關涉到和日月以及整個宇宙有關的最後審判的前奏。因此,可憐的良心得不著寧息,卻為可怕的風暴所激蕩,感覺到自己正在為上帝的忿怒所撕裂,為致命的刀槍所刺透,為神的雷電所驚駭,為神膀臂的打擊所摧毀,感覺到沉沒於深淵海底,較之在這種恐怖中忍受片刻還要好些。總之,永遠承愛神的忿怒是何等可怕的刑罰呀!關於這事,詩篇第九十篇有值得注意的描寫,就是說,他雖以他的面光顛播一切世人,叫他們趨於滅亡,然而他按照他僕人的軟弱本性所需要的,激勵他們,叫他們能在十字架的重負之下努力前進,直到他在萬物之上,為萬物之主。

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15043
沙發
 樓主| 追求永生 發表於 2010-1-20 13:52 | 只看該作者
第七及第八節、駁斥摩尼教派的復活論——從略

7. Equally monstrous is the error of those who imagine that the soul, instead of resuming the body with which it is now clothed, will obtain a new and different body. Nothing can be more futile than the reason given by the Manichees--viz. that it were incongruous for impure flesh to rise again: as if there were no impurity in the soul; and yet this does not exclude it from the hope of heavenly life. It is just as if they were to say, that what is infected by the taint of sin cannot be divinely purified; for I now say nothing to the delirious dream that flesh is naturally impure as having been created by the devil. I only maintain, that nothing in us at present, which is unworthy of heaven, is any obstacle to the resurrection. But, first, Paul enjoins believers to purify themselves from "all filthiness of the flesh and spirit," (2 Cor. 7:1 the judgment which is to follow, that every one shall "receive the things done in his body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad," (2 Cor. 5:10). With this accords what he says to the Corinthians, "That the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body," (2 Cor. 4:10). For which reason he elsewhere says, "I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ," (1 Thess. 5:23). He says "body" as well as "spirit and soul," and no wonder; for it were most absurd that bodies which God has dedicated to himself as temples should fall into corruption without hope of resurrection. What? are they not also the members of Christ? Does he not pray that God would sanctify every part of them, and enjoin them to celebrate his name with their tongues, lift up pure hands, and offer sacrifices? That part of man, therefore, which the heavenly Judge so highly honors, what madness is it for any mortal man to reduce to dust without hope of revival? In like manner, when Paul exhorts, "glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's," he certainly does not allow that that which he claims for God as sacred is to be adjudged to eternal corruption. Nor, indeed, on any subject does Scripture furnish clearer explanation than on the resurrection of our flesh. "This corruptible (says Paul) must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality," (1 Cor. 15:53). If God formed new bodies, where would be this change of quality? If it were said that we must be renewed, the ambiguity of the expression might, perhaps, afford room for cavil; but here pointing with the finger to the bodies with which we are clothed, and promising that they shall be incorruptible, he very plainly affirms that no new bodies are to be fabricated. "Nay," as Tertullian says, "he could not have spoken more expressly, if he had held his skin in his hands," (Tertull. de Resurrect. Carnis). Nor can any cavil enable them to evade the force of another passage, in which saying that Christ will be the Judge of the world, he quotes from Isaiah, "As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me," (Rom. 14:11; Isa. 45:23); since he openly declares that those whom he was addressing will have to give an account of their lives. This could not be true if new bodies were to be sisted to the tribunal. Moreover, there is no ambiguity in the words of Daniel, "Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt," (Dan. 12:2); since he does not bring new matter from the four elements to compose men, but calls forth the dead from their graves. And the reason which dictates this is plain. For if death, which originated in the fall of man, is adventitious, the renewal produced by Christ must be in the same body which began to be mortal. And, certainly, since the Athenians mocked Paul for asserting the resurrection (Acts 17:32), we may infer what his preaching was: their derision is of no small force to confirm our faith. The saying of our Savior also is worthy of observation, "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," (Mt. 10:28). Here there would be no ground for fear; were not the body which we now have liable to punishment. Nor is another saying of our Savior less obscure, "The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation," (John 5:28, 29). Shall we say that the soul rests in the grave, that it may there hear the voice of Christ, and not rather that the body shall at his command resume the vigor which it had lost? Moreover, if we are to receive new bodies, where will be the conformity of the Head and the members? Christ rose again. Was it by forming for himself a new body? Nay, he had foretold, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," (John 2:19). The mortal body which he had formerly carried he again received; for it would not have availed us much if a new body had been substituted, and that which had been offered in expiatory sacrifice been destroyed. We must, therefore, attend to that connection which the Apostle celebrates, that we rise because Christ rose (1 Cor. 15:12); nothing being less probable than that the flesh in which we bear about the dying of Christ, shall have no share in the resurrection of Christ. This was even manifested by a striking example, when, at the resurrection of Christ, many bodies of the saints came forth from their graves. For it cannot be denied that this was a prelude, or rather earnest, of the final resurrection for which we hope, such as already existed in Enoch and Elijah, whom Tertullian calls candidates for resurrection, because, exempted from corruption, both in body and soul, they were received into the custody of God. the judgment which is to follow, that every one shall "receive the things done in his body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad," (2 Cor. 5:10). With this accords what he says to the Corinthians, "That the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body," (2 Cor. 4:10). For which reason he elsewhere says, "I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ," (1 Thess. 5:23). He says "body" as well as "spirit and soul," and no wonder; for it were most absurd that bodies which God has dedicated to himself as temples should fall into corruption without hope of resurrection. What? are they not also the members of Christ? Does he not pray that God would sanctify every part of them, and enjoin them to celebrate his name with their tongues, lift up pure hands, and offer sacrifices? That part of man, therefore, which the heavenly Judge so highly honors, what madness is it for any mortal man to reduce to dust without hope of revival? In like manner, when Paul exhorts, "glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's," he certainly does not allow that that which he claims for God as sacred is to be adjudged to eternal corruption. Nor, indeed, on any subject does Scripture furnish clearer explanation than on the resurrection of our flesh. "This corruptible (says Paul) must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality," (1 Cor. 15:53). If God formed new bodies, where would be this change of quality? If it were said that we must be renewed, the ambiguity of the expression might, perhaps, afford room for cavil; but here pointing with the finger to the bodies with which we are clothed, and promising that they shall be incorruptible, he very plainly affirms that no new bodies are to be fabricated. "Nay," as Tertullian says, "he could not have spoken more expressly, if he had held his skin in his hands," (Tertull. de Resurrect. Carnis). Nor can any cavil enable them to evade the force of another passage, in which saying that Christ will be the Judge of the world, he quotes from Isaiah, "As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me," (Rom. 14:11; Isa. 45:23); since he openly declares that those whom he was addressing will have to give an account of their lives. This could not be true if new bodies were to be sisted to the tribunal. Moreover, there is no ambiguity in the words of Daniel, "Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt," (Dan. 12:2); since he does not bring new matter from the four elements to compose men, but calls forth the dead from their graves. And the reason which dictates this is plain. For if death, which originated in the fall of man, is adventitious, the renewal produced by Christ must be in the same body which began to be mortal. And, certainly, since the Athenians mocked Paul for asserting the resurrection (Acts 17:32), we may infer what his preaching was: their derision is of no small force to confirm our faith. The saying of our Savior also is worthy of observation, "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," (Mt. 10:28). Here there would be no ground for fear; were not the body which we now have liable to punishment. Nor is another saying of our Savior less obscure, "The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation," (John 5:28, 29). Shall we say that the soul rests in the grave, that it may there hear the voice of Christ, and not rather that the body shall at his command resume the vigor which it had lost? Moreover, if we are to receive new bodies, where will be the conformity of the Head and the members? Christ rose again. Was it by forming for himself a new body? Nay, he had foretold, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," (John 2:19). The mortal body which he had formerly carried he again received; for it would not have availed us much if a new body had been substituted, and that which had been offered in expiatory sacrifice been destroyed. We must, therefore, attend to that connection which the Apostle celebrates, that we rise because Christ rose (1 Cor. 15:12); nothing being less probable than that the flesh in which we bear about the dying of Christ, shall have no share in the resurrection of Christ. This was even manifested by a striking example, when, at the resurrection of Christ, many bodies of the saints came forth from their graves. For it cannot be denied that this was a prelude, or rather earnest, of the final resurrection for which we hope, such as already existed in Enoch and Elijah, whom Tertullian calls candidates for resurrection, because, exempted from corruption, both in body and soul, they were received into the custody of God.

8. I am ashamed to waste so many words on so clear a matter; but my readers will kindly submit to the annoyance, in order that perverse and presumptuous minds may not be able to avail themselves of any flaw to deceive the simple. The volatile spirits with whom I now dispute adduce the fiction of their own brain, that in the resurrection there will be a creation of new bodies. Their only reason for thinking so is, that it seems to them incredible that a dead body, long wasted by corruption, should return to its former state. Therefore, mere unbelief is the parent of their opinion. The Spirit of God, on the contrary, uniformly exhorts us in Scripture to hope for the resurrection of our flesh. For this reason Baptism is, according to Paul, a seal of our future resurrection; and in like manner the holy Supper invites us confidently to expect it, when with our mouths we receive the symbols of spiritual grace. And certainly the whole exhortation of Paul, "Yield ye your members as instruments of righteousness unto God," (Rom. 6:13), would be frigid, did he not add, as he does in another passage, "He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies," (Rom. 8:11). For what would it avail to apply feet, hands, eyes, and tongues, to the service of God, did not these afterwards participate in the benefit and reward? This Paul expressly confirms when he says, "The body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body. And God has both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power," (1 Cor. 6:13, 14). The words which follow are still clearer, "Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ?" "Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost?" (1 Cor. 6:15, 19). Meanwhile, we see how he connects the resurrection with chastity and holiness, as he shortly after includes our bodies in the purchase of redemption. It would be inconsistent with reason, that the body, in which Paul bore the marks of his Savior, and in which he magnificently extolled him (Gal. 6:17), should lose the reward of the crown. Hence he glories thus, "Our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body," (Phil. 3:20, 21). As it is true, "That we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God," (Acts 14:22); so it were unreasonable that this entrance should be denied to the bodies which God exercises under the banner of the cross and adorns with the palm of victory.

Accordingly, the saints never entertained any doubt that they would one day be the companions of Christ, who transfers to his own person all the afflictions by which we are tried, that he may show their quickening power.51[4] Nay, under the law, God trained the holy patriarch in this belief, by means of an external ceremony. For to what end was the rite of burial, as we have already seen, unless to teach that new life was prepared for the bodies thus deposited? Hence, also, the spices and other symbols of immortality, by which under the law the obscurity of the doctrine was illustrated in the same way as by sacrifices. That custom was not the offspring of superstition, since we see that the Spirit is not less careful in narrating burials than in stating the principal mysteries of the faith. Christ commends these last offices as of no trivial importance (Mt. 16:10), and that, certainly, for no other reason than just that they raise our eyes from the view of the tombs which corrupts and destroys all things, to the prospect of renovation. Besides, that careful observance of the ceremony for which the patriarchs are praised, sufficiently proves that they found in it a special and valuable help to their faith. Nor would Abraham have been so anxious about the burial of his wife (Gen. 23:4, 19), had not the religious views and something superior to any worldly advantage, been present to his mind; in other words, by adorning her dead body with the insignia of the resurrection, he confirmed his own faith, and that of his family. A clearer proof of this appears in the example of Jacob, who, to testify to his posterity that even death did not destroy the hope of the promised land, orders his bones to be carried thither. Had he been to be clothed with a new body would it not have been ridiculous in him to give commands concerning a dust which was to be reduced to nothing? Wherefore, if Scripture has any authority with us, we cannot desire a clearer or stronger proof of any doctrine. Even tyros understand this to be the meaning of the words, resurrection, and raising up. A thing which is created for the first time cannot be said to rise again; nor could our Savior have said, "This is the Father's will which has sent me, that of all which he has given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day," (John 6:39). The same is implied in the word sleeping, which is applicable only to the body. Hence, too, the name of cemetery, applied to burying-grounds.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15043
3
 樓主| 追求永生 發表於 2010-1-20 13:53 | 只看該作者
CHAPTER 25.
OF THE LAST RESURRECTION.
There are four principal heads in this chapter,--I. The utility, necessity, truth, and irrefragable evidence of the orthodox doctrine of a final resurrection--a doctrine unknown to philosophers, sec. 1ñ4. II. Refutation of the objections to this doctrine by Atheists, Sadducees, Chiliasts, and other fanatics, sec. 5ñ7. III. The nature of the final resurrection explained, sec. 8, 9. IV. Of the eternal felicity of the elect, and the everlasting misery of the reprobate.

Sections.

1. For invincible perseverance in our calling, it is necessary to be animated with the blessed hope of our Savior's final advent.

2. The perfect happiness reserved for the elect at the final resurrection unknown to philosophers.

3. The truth and necessity of this doctrine of a final resurrection. To confirm our belief in it we have, 1. The example of Christ; and, 2. The omnipotence of God. There is an inseparable connection between us and our risen Savior. The bodies of the elect must be conformed to the body of their Head. It is now in heaven. Therefore, our bodies also must rise, and, reanimated by their souls, reign with Christ in heaven. The resurrection of Christ a pledge of ours.

4. As God is omnipotent, he can raise the dead. Resurrection explained by a natural process. The vision of dry bones.

5. Second part of the chapter, refuting objections to the doctrine of resurrection. 1. Atheists. 2. Sadducees. 3. Chiliasts. Their evasion. Various answers. 4. Universalists. Answer.

6. Objections continued. 5. Some speculators who imagine that death destroys the whole man. Refutation. The condition and abode of souls from death till the last day. What meant by the bosom of Abraham.

7. Refutation of some weak men and Manichees, pretending that new bodies are to be given. Refutation confirmed by various arguments and passages of Scripture.

8. Refutation of the fiction of new bodies continued.

9. Shall the wicked rise again? Answer in the affirmative. Why the wicked shall rise again. Why resurrection promised to the elect only.

10. The last part of the chapter, treating of eternal felicity; 1 Its excellence transcends our capacity. Rules to be observed. The glory of all the saints will not be equal.

11. Without rewarding questions which merely puzzle, an answer given to some which are not without use.

12. As the happiness of the elect, so the misery of the reprobate, will be without measure, and without end.

1. ALTHOUGH Christ, the Sun of righteousness, shining upon us through the gospel, has, as Paul declares, after conquering death, given us the light of life; and hence on believing we are said to have passed from "death unto life," being no longer strangers and pilgrims, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God, who has made us sit with his only begotten Son in heavenly places, so that nothing is wanting to our complete felicity; yet, lest we should feel it grievous to be exercised under a hard warfare, as if the victory obtained by Christ had produced no fruit, we must attend to what is elsewhere taught concerning the nature of hope. For since we hope for what we see not, and faith, as is said in another passage, is "the evidence of things not seen" so long as we are imprisoned in the body we are absent from the Lord. For which reason Paul says, "Ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory." Our present condition, therefore, requires us to "live soberly, righteously, and godly;" "looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ." Here there is need of no ordinary patience, lest, worn out with fatigue, we either turn backwards or abandon our post. Wherefore, all that has hitherto been said of our salvation calls upon us to raise our minds towards heaven, that, as Peter exhorts, though we now see not Christ, "yet believing," we may "rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory," receiving the end of our faith, even the salvation of our souls.51[0] For this reason Paul says, that the faith and charity of the saints have respect to the faith and hope which is laid up for them in heaven (Col. 1:5). When we thus keep our eyes fixed upon Christ in heaven, and nothing on earth prevents us from directing them to the promised blessedness, there is a true fulfillment of the saying, "where your treasure is, there will your heart be also," (Mt. 6:21). Hence the reason why faith is so rare in the world; nothing being more difficult for our sluggishness than to surmount innumerable obstacles in striving for the prize of our high calling. To the immense load of miseries which almost overwhelm us, are added the jeers of profane men, who assail us for our simplicity, when spontaneously renouncing the allurements of the present life we seem, in seeking a happiness which lies hid from us, to catch at a fleeting shadow. In short, we are beset above and below, behind and before, with violent temptations, which our minds would be altogether unable to withstand, were they not set free from earthly objects and devoted to the heavenly life, though apparently remote from us. Wherefore, he alone has made solid progress in the Gospel who has acquired the habit of meditating continually on a blessed resurrection.

2. In ancient times philosophers discoursed, and even debated with each other, concerning the chief good: none, however, except Plato acknowledged that it consisted in union with God. He could not, however, form even an imperfect idea of its true nature; nor is this strange, as he had learned nothing of the sacred bond of that union. We even in this our earthly pilgrimage know wherein our perfect and only felicity consists,--a felicity which, while we long for it, daily inflames our hearts more and more, until we attain to full fruition. Therefore I said, that none participate in the benefits of Christ save those who raise their minds to the resurrection. This, accordingly, is the mark which Paul sets before believers, and at which he says they are to aim, forgetting every thing until they reach its (Phil. 3:8). The more strenuously, therefore, must we contend for it, lest if the world engross us we be severely punished for our sloth.51[1] Accordingly, he in another passage distinguishes believers by this mark, that their conversation is in heaven, from whence they look for the Savior (Phil. 3:20). And that they may not faint in their course, he associates all the other creatures with them. As shapeless ruins are everywhere seen, he says, that all things in heaven and earth struggle for renovation. For since Adam by his fall destroyed the proper order of nature, the creatures groan under the servitude to which they have been subjected through his sin; not that they are at all endued with sense, but that they naturally long for the state of perfection from which they have fallen. Paul therefore describes them as groaning and travailing in pain (Rom. 8:19); so that we who have received the first-fruits of the Spirit may be ashamed to grovel in our corruption, instead of at least imitating the inanimate elements which are bearing the punishment of another's sin. And in order that he may stimulate us the more powerfully, he terms the final advent of Christ our redemption. It is true, indeed, that all the parts of our redemption are already accomplished; but as Christ was once offered for sins (Heb. 9:28), so he shall again appear without sin unto salvation. Whatever, then, be the afflictions by which we are pressed, let this redemption sustain us until its final accomplishment.

3. The very importance of the subject ought to increase our ardor. Paul justly contends, that if Christ rise not the whole gospel is delusive and vain (1 Cor. 15:13ñ17); for our condition would be more miserable than that of other mortals, because we are exposed to much hatred and insult, and incur danger every hour; nay, are like sheep destined for slaughter; and hence the authority of the gospel would fail, not in one part merely, but in its very essence, including both our adoption and the accomplishment of our salvation. Let us, therefore, give heed to a matter of all others the most serious, so that no length of time may produce weariness. I have deferred the brief consideration to be given of it to this place, that my readers may learn, when they have received Christ, the author of perfect salvation, to rise higher, and know that he is clothed with heavenly immortality and glory in order that the whole body may be rendered conformable to the Head. For thus the Holy Spirit is ever setting before us in his person an example of the resurrection. It is difficult to believe that after our bodies have been consumed with rottenness, they sill rise again at their appointed time. And hence, while many of the philosophers maintained the immortality of the soul, few of them assented to the resurrection of the body. Although in this they were inexcusable, we are thereby reminded that the subject is too difficult for human apprehension to reach it. To enable faith to surmount the great difficulty, Scripture furnishes two auxiliary proofs, the one the likeness of Christ's resurrection, and the other the omnipotence of God. Therefore, whenever the subject of the resurrection is considered, let us think of the case of our Savior, who, having completed his mortal course in our nature which he had assumed, obtained immortality, and is now the pledge of our future resurrection. For in the miseries by which we are beset, we always bear "about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh," (2 Cor. 4:10). It is not lawful, it is not even possible, to separate him from us, without dividing him. Hence Paul's argument, "If there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen," (1 Cor. 15:13); for he assumes it as an acknowledged principle, that when Christ was subjected to death, and by rising gained a victory over death, it was not on his own account, but in the Head was begun what must necessarily be fulfilled in all the members, according to the degree and order of each. For it would not be proper to be made equal to him in all respects. It is said in the psalm, "Neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption," (Ps. 16:10). Although a portion of this confidence appertain to us according to the measure bestowed on us, yet the full effect appeared only in Christ, who, free from all corruption, resumed a spotless body. Then, that there may be no doubt as to our fellowship with Christ in a blessed resurrection, and that we may be contented with this pledge, Paul distinctly affirms that he sits in the heavens, and will come as a judge on the last day for the express purpose of changing our vile body, "that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body," (Phil. 3:21). For he elsewhere says that God did not raise up his Son from death to give an isolated specimen of his mighty power, but that the Spirit exerts the same efficacy in regard to them that believe; and accordingly he says, that the Spirit when he dwells in us is life, because the end for which he was given is to quicken our mortal body (Rom. 8:10, 11; Col. 3:4). I briefly glance at subjects which might be treated more copiously, and deserve to be adorned more splendidly, and yet in the little I have said I trust pious readers will find sufficient materials for building up their faith. Christ rose again that he might have us as partakers with him of future life. He was raised up by the Father, inasmuch as he was the Head of the Church, from which he cannot possibly be dissevered. He was raised up by the power of the Spirit, who also in us performs the office of quickening. In fine, he was raised up to be the resurrection and the life. But as we have said, that in this mirror we behold a living image of the resurrection, so it furnishes a sure evidence to support our minds, provided we faint not, nor grow weary at the long delay, because it is not ours to measure the periods of time at our own pleasure; but to rest patiently till God in his own time renew his kingdom. To this Paul refers when he says, "But every man in his own order: Christ the first-fruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming," (1 Cor. 15:23).

But lest any question should be raised as to the resurrection of Christ on which ours is founded, we see how often and in what various ways he has borne testimony to it. Scoffing men will deride the narrative which is given by the Evangelist as a childish fable. For what importance will they attach to a message which timid women brings and the disciples almost dead with fear, afterwards confirm? Why does not Christ rather place the illustrious trophies of his victory in the midst of the temple and the forum? Why does he not come forth, and in the presence of Pilate strike terror? Why does he not show himself alive again to the priests and all Jerusalem? Profane men will scarcely admit that the witnesses whom he selects are well qualified. I answer, that though at the commencement their infirmity was contemptible, yet the whole was directed by the admirable providence of God, so that partly from love to Christ and religious zeal, partly from incredulity, those who were lately overcome with fear now hurry to the sepulchre, not only that they might be eye-witnesses of the fact, but that they might hear angels announce what they actually saw. How can we question the veracity of those who regarded what the women told them as a fable, until they saw the reality? It is not strange that the whole people and also the governor, after they were furnished with sufficient evidence for conviction, were not allowed to see Christ or the other signs (Mt. 27:66; 28:11). The sepulchre is sealed, sentinels keep watch, on the third day the body is not found. The soldiers are bribed to spread the report that his disciples had stolen the body. As if they had had the means of deforming a band of soldiers, or been supplied with weapons, or been trained so as to make such a daring attempt. But if the soldiers had not courage enough to repel them, why did they not follow and apprehend some of them by the aid of the populace? Pilate, therefore, in fact, put his signet to the resurrection of Christ, and the guards who were placed at the sepulchre by their silence or falsehood also became heralds of his resurrection. Meanwhile, the voice of angels was heard, "He is not here, but is risen," (Luke 24:6). The celestial splendor plainly shows that they were not men but angels. Afterwards, if any doubt still remained, Christ himself removed it. The disciples saw him frequently; they even touched his hands and his feet, and their unbelief is of no little avail in confirming our faith. He discoursed to them of the mysteries of the kingdom of God, and at length, while they beheld, ascended to heaven. This spectacle was exhibited not to eleven apostles only, but was seen by more than five hundred brethren at once (1 Cor. 15:6). Then by sending the Holy Spirit he gave a proof not only of life but also of supreme power, as he had foretold, "It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you," (John 16:7). Paul was not thrown down on the way by the power of a dead man, but felt that he whom he was opposing was possessed of sovereign authority. To Stephen he appeared for another purpose--viz. that he might overcome the fear of death by the certainty of life. To refuse assent to these numerous and authentic proofs is not diffidence, but depraved and therefore infatuated obstinacy.

4. We have said that in proving the resurrection our thoughts must be directed to the immense power of God. This Paul briefly teaches, when he says that the Lord Jesus Christ "shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working of that mighty power whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself," (Phil. 3:21). Wherefore, nothing can be more incongruous than to look here at what can be done naturally when the subject presented to us is an inestimable miracle, which by its magnitude absorbs our senses. Paul, however, by producing a proof from nature, confutes the senselessness of those who deny the resurrection. "Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened except it die," &c. (1 Cor. 15:36). He says that in seed there is a species of resurrection, because the crop is produced from corruption. Nor would the thing be so difficult of belief were we as attentive as we ought to be to the wonders which meet our eye in every quarter of the world. But let us remember that none is truly persuaded of the future resurrection save he who, carried away with admiration gives God the glory.

Elated with this convictions Isaiah exclaims, "Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust," (Isaiah 26:19). In desperate circumstances he rises to God, the author of life, in whose hand are "the issues from death," (Psalm 68:20). Job also, when liker a dead body than a living being, trusting to the power of God, hesitates not as if in full vigor to rise to that day: "I know that my Redeemer liveth, and that he will stand at the latter day upon the earth;" (that is, that he will there exert his power): "and though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God; whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another," (Job 19:25ñ27). For though some have recourse to a more subtle interpretation, by which they wrest these passages, as if they were not to be understood of the resurrection, they only confirm what they are desirous to overthrow; for holy men, in seeking consolation in their misfortunes, have recourse for alleviation merely to the similitude of a resurrection. This is better learned from a passage in Ezekiel. When the Jews scouted the promise of return, and objected that the probability of it was not greater than that of the dead coming forth from the tomb, there is presented to the prophet in vision a field covered with dry bones, which at the command of God recover sinews and flesh. Though under that figure he encourages the people to hope for return, yet the ground of hope is taken from the resurrection, as it is the special type of all the deliverances which believers experience in this world. Thus Christ declares that the voice of the Gospel gives life; but because the Jews did not receive it, he immediately adds, "Marvel not at this; for the hour is coming in which all that are in the grave shall hear his voice, and shall come forth," (John 5:28, 29). Wherefore, amid all our conflicts let us exult after the example of Paul, that he who has promised us future life "is able to keep that" which "is committed unto him," and thus glory that there is laid up for us "a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give," (2 Tim. 1:12; 4:8). Thus all the hardships which we may endure will be a demonstration of our future life, "seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you; and to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, in flaming fire," (2 Thess. 1:6ñ8). But we must attend to what he shortly after adds--viz. that he "shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe," by receiving the Gospel.

5. Although the minds of men ought to be perpetually occupied with this pursuits yet as if they actually resolved to banish all remembrance of the resurrection, they have called death the end of all things, the extinction of man. For Solomon certainly expresses the commonly received opinion when he says "A living dog is better than a dead lion," (Eccl. 9:4). And again, "Who knoweth the spirit of man that goes upward, and the spirit of the beast that goes downward to the earth?"51[2] In all ages a brutish stupor has prevailed, and, accordingly, it has made its way into the very Church; for the Sadducees had the hardihood openly to profess that there was no resurrection, nay, that the soul was mortal (Mark 12:18; Luke 20:27). But that this gross ignorance might be no excuse, unbelievers have always by natural instinct had an image of the resurrection before their eyes. For why the sacred and inviolable custom of burying, but that it might be the earnest of a new life? Nor can it be said that it had its origin in error, for the solemnity of sepulture always prevailed among the holy patriarchs, and God was pleased that the same custom should continue among the Gentiles, in order that the image of the resurrection thus presented might shake off their torpor. But although that ceremony was without profit, yet it is useful to us if we prudently consider its end; because it is no feeble refutation of infidelity that all men agreed in professing what none of them believed. But not only did Satan stupefy the senses of mankind, so that with their bodies they buried the remembrance of the resurrection; but he also managed by various fictions so to corrupt this branch of doctrine that it at length was lost. Not to mention that even in the days of Paul he began to assail it (1 Cor. 15), shortly after the Chiliasts 1 arose, who limited the reign of Christ to a thousand years. This fiction is too puerile to need or to deserve refutation. Nor do they receive any countenance from the Apocalypse, from which it is known that they extracted a gloss for their error (Rev. 20:4), since the thousand years there mentioned refer not to the eternal blessedness of the Church, but only to the various troubles which await the Church militant in this world. The whole Scripture proclaims that there will be no end either to the happiness of the elect, or the punishment of the reprobate. Moreover, in regard to all things which lie beyond our sight, and far transcend the reach of our intellect, belief must either be founded on the sure oracles of God, or altogether renounced. Those who assign only a thousand years to the children of God to enjoy the inheritance of future life, observe not how great an insult they offer to Christ and his kingdom. 2 If they are not to be clothed with immortality, then Christ himself, into whose glory they shall be transformed, has not been received into immortal glory; if their blessedness is to have an end, the kingdom of Christ, on whose solid structure it rests, is temporary. In short, they are either most ignorant of all divine things or they maliciously aim at subverting the whole grace of God and power of Christ, which cannot have their full effects unless sin is obliterated, death swallowed up, and eternal life fully renewed. How stupid and frivolous their fear that too much severity will be ascribed to God, if the reprobate are doomed to eternal punishment, even the blind may see. The Lord, forsooth, will be unjust if he exclude from his kingdom those who, by their ingratitude shall have rendered themselves unworthy of it. But their sins are temporary (see Bernard, Epist. 254). I admit it; but then the majesty of God, and also the justice which they have violated by their sins, are eternal. Justly, therefore, the memory of their iniquity does not perish. But in this way the punishment will exceed the measure of the fault. It is intolerable blasphemy to hold the majesty of God in so little estimation, as not to regard the contempt of it as of greater consequence than the destruction of a single soul. But let us have done with these triflers, that we may not seem (contrary to what we first observed) to think their dreams deserving of refutation.

6. Besides these, other two dreams have been invented by men who indulge a wicked curiosity. Some, under the idea that the whole man perishes, have thought that the soul will rise again with the body; while others, admitting that spirits are immortal, hold that they will be clothed with new bodies, and thus deny the resurrection of the flesh. Having already adverted to the former point when speaking of the creation of man, it will be sufficient again to remind the reader how groveling an error it is to convert a spirit, formed after the image of God, into an evanescent breath, which animates the body only during this fading life, and to reduce the temple of the Holy Spirit to nothing; in short, to rob of the badge of immortality that part of ourselves in which the divinity is most Refulgent and the marks of immortality conspicuous, so as to make the condition of the body better and more excellent than that of the soul. Very different is the course taken by Scripture, which compares the body to a tabernacle, from which it describes us as migrating when we die, because it estimates us by that part which distinguishes us from the lower animals. Thus Peter, in reference to his approaching death, says, "Knowing that shortly I must put off this my tabernacle," (2 Pet. 1:14). Paul, again, speaking of believers, after saying, "If our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God," adds, "Whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord," (2 Cor. 5:1, 6). Did not the soul survive the body, how could it be present with the Lord on being separated from the body? But an Apostle removes all doubt when he says that we go "to the spirits of just men made perfect," (Heb. 12:23); by these words meaning, that we are associated with the holy patriarchs, who, even when dead, cultivate the same piety, so that we cannot be the members of Christ unless we unite with them. And did not the soul, when unclothed from the body, retain its essence, and be capable of beatific glory, our Savior would not have said to the thief, "Today shalt thou be with me in paradise," (Luke 23:43). Trusting to these clear proofs, let us doubt not, after the example of our Savior, to commend our spirits to God when we come to die, or after the example of Stephen, to commit ourselves to the protection of Christ, who, with good reason, is called "The Shepherd and Bishop" of our souls (Acts 7:59; 1 Pet. 2:25). Moreover, to pry curiously into their intermediate state is neither lawful nor expedient (see Calv. Psychopannychia). Many greatly torment themselves with discussing what place they occupy, and whether or not they already enjoy celestial glory. It is foolish and rash to inquire into hidden things, farther than God permits us to know. Scripture, after telling that Christ is present with them, and receives them into paradise (John 12:32), and that they are comforted, while the souls of the reprobate suffer the torments which they have merited goes no farther. What teacher or doctor will reveal to us what God has concealed? As to the place of abode, the question is not less futile and inept, since we know that the dimension of the soul is not the same as that of the body.51[3] When the abode of blessed spirits is designated as the bosom of Abraham, it is plain that, on quitting this pilgrimage, they are received by the common father of the faithful, who imparts to them the fruit of his faith. Still, since Scripture uniformly enjoins us to look with expectation to the advent of Christ, and delays the crown of glory till that period, let us be contented with the limits divinely prescribed to us--viz. that the souls of the righteous, after their warfare is ended, obtain blessed rest where in joy they wait for the fruition of promised glory, and that thus the final result is suspended till Christ the Redeemer appear. There can be no doubt that the reprobate have the same doom as that which Jude assigns to the devils, they are "reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day," (Jude ver. 6).

7. Equally monstrous is the error of those who imagine that the soul, instead of resuming the body with which it is now clothed, will obtain a new and different body. Nothing can be more futile than the reason given by the Manichees--viz. that it were incongruous for impure flesh to rise again: as if there were no impurity in the soul; and yet this does not exclude it from the hope of heavenly life. It is just as if they were to say, that what is infected by the taint of sin cannot be divinely purified; for I now say nothing to the delirious dream that flesh is naturally impure as having been created by the devil. I only maintain, that nothing in us at present, which is unworthy of heaven, is any obstacle to the resurrection. But, first, Paul enjoins believers to purify themselves from "all filthiness of the flesh and spirit," (2 Cor. 7:1 the judgment which is to follow, that every one shall "receive the things done in his body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad," (2 Cor. 5:10). With this accords what he says to the Corinthians, "That the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body," (2 Cor. 4:10). For which reason he elsewhere says, "I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ," (1 Thess. 5:23). He says "body" as well as "spirit and soul," and no wonder; for it were most absurd that bodies which God has dedicated to himself as temples should fall into corruption without hope of resurrection. What? are they not also the members of Christ? Does he not pray that God would sanctify every part of them, and enjoin them to celebrate his name with their tongues, lift up pure hands, and offer sacrifices? That part of man, therefore, which the heavenly Judge so highly honors, what madness is it for any mortal man to reduce to dust without hope of revival? In like manner, when Paul exhorts, "glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's," he certainly does not allow that that which he claims for God as sacred is to be adjudged to eternal corruption. Nor, indeed, on any subject does Scripture furnish clearer explanation than on the resurrection of our flesh. "This corruptible (says Paul) must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality," (1 Cor. 15:53). If God formed new bodies, where would be this change of quality? If it were said that we must be renewed, the ambiguity of the expression might, perhaps, afford room for cavil; but here pointing with the finger to the bodies with which we are clothed, and promising that they shall be incorruptible, he very plainly affirms that no new bodies are to be fabricated. "Nay," as Tertullian says, "he could not have spoken more expressly, if he had held his skin in his hands," (Tertull. de Resurrect. Carnis). Nor can any cavil enable them to evade the force of another passage, in which saying that Christ will be the Judge of the world, he quotes from Isaiah, "As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me," (Rom. 14:11; Isa. 45:23); since he openly declares that those whom he was addressing will have to give an account of their lives. This could not be true if new bodies were to be sisted to the tribunal. Moreover, there is no ambiguity in the words of Daniel, "Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt," (Dan. 12:2); since he does not bring new matter from the four elements to compose men, but calls forth the dead from their graves. And the reason which dictates this is plain. For if death, which originated in the fall of man, is adventitious, the renewal produced by Christ must be in the same body which began to be mortal. And, certainly, since the Athenians mocked Paul for asserting the resurrection (Acts 17:32), we may infer what his preaching was: their derision is of no small force to confirm our faith. The saying of our Savior also is worthy of observation, "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," (Mt. 10:28). Here there would be no ground for fear; were not the body which we now have liable to punishment. Nor is another saying of our Savior less obscure, "The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation," (John 5:28, 29). Shall we say that the soul rests in the grave, that it may there hear the voice of Christ, and not rather that the body shall at his command resume the vigor which it had lost? Moreover, if we are to receive new bodies, where will be the conformity of the Head and the members? Christ rose again. Was it by forming for himself a new body? Nay, he had foretold, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," (John 2:19). The mortal body which he had formerly carried he again received; for it would not have availed us much if a new body had been substituted, and that which had been offered in expiatory sacrifice been destroyed. We must, therefore, attend to that connection which the Apostle celebrates, that we rise because Christ rose (1 Cor. 15:12); nothing being less probable than that the flesh in which we bear about the dying of Christ, shall have no share in the resurrection of Christ. This was even manifested by a striking example, when, at the resurrection of Christ, many bodies of the saints came forth from their graves. For it cannot be denied that this was a prelude, or rather earnest, of the final resurrection for which we hope, such as already existed in Enoch and Elijah, whom Tertullian calls candidates for resurrection, because, exempted from corruption, both in body and soul, they were received into the custody of God. the judgment which is to follow, that every one shall "receive the things done in his body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad," (2 Cor. 5:10). With this accords what he says to the Corinthians, "That the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body," (2 Cor. 4:10). For which reason he elsewhere says, "I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ," (1 Thess. 5:23). He says "body" as well as "spirit and soul," and no wonder; for it were most absurd that bodies which God has dedicated to himself as temples should fall into corruption without hope of resurrection. What? are they not also the members of Christ? Does he not pray that God would sanctify every part of them, and enjoin them to celebrate his name with their tongues, lift up pure hands, and offer sacrifices? That part of man, therefore, which the heavenly Judge so highly honors, what madness is it for any mortal man to reduce to dust without hope of revival? In like manner, when Paul exhorts, "glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's," he certainly does not allow that that which he claims for God as sacred is to be adjudged to eternal corruption. Nor, indeed, on any subject does Scripture furnish clearer explanation than on the resurrection of our flesh. "This corruptible (says Paul) must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality," (1 Cor. 15:53). If God formed new bodies, where would be this change of quality? If it were said that we must be renewed, the ambiguity of the expression might, perhaps, afford room for cavil; but here pointing with the finger to the bodies with which we are clothed, and promising that they shall be incorruptible, he very plainly affirms that no new bodies are to be fabricated. "Nay," as Tertullian says, "he could not have spoken more expressly, if he had held his skin in his hands," (Tertull. de Resurrect. Carnis). Nor can any cavil enable them to evade the force of another passage, in which saying that Christ will be the Judge of the world, he quotes from Isaiah, "As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me," (Rom. 14:11; Isa. 45:23); since he openly declares that those whom he was addressing will have to give an account of their lives. This could not be true if new bodies were to be sisted to the tribunal. Moreover, there is no ambiguity in the words of Daniel, "Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt," (Dan. 12:2); since he does not bring new matter from the four elements to compose men, but calls forth the dead from their graves. And the reason which dictates this is plain. For if death, which originated in the fall of man, is adventitious, the renewal produced by Christ must be in the same body which began to be mortal. And, certainly, since the Athenians mocked Paul for asserting the resurrection (Acts 17:32), we may infer what his preaching was: their derision is of no small force to confirm our faith. The saying of our Savior also is worthy of observation, "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," (Mt. 10:28). Here there would be no ground for fear; were not the body which we now have liable to punishment. Nor is another saying of our Savior less obscure, "The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation," (John 5:28, 29). Shall we say that the soul rests in the grave, that it may there hear the voice of Christ, and not rather that the body shall at his command resume the vigor which it had lost? Moreover, if we are to receive new bodies, where will be the conformity of the Head and the members? Christ rose again. Was it by forming for himself a new body? Nay, he had foretold, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," (John 2:19). The mortal body which he had formerly carried he again received; for it would not have availed us much if a new body had been substituted, and that which had been offered in expiatory sacrifice been destroyed. We must, therefore, attend to that connection which the Apostle celebrates, that we rise because Christ rose (1 Cor. 15:12); nothing being less probable than that the flesh in which we bear about the dying of Christ, shall have no share in the resurrection of Christ. This was even manifested by a striking example, when, at the resurrection of Christ, many bodies of the saints came forth from their graves. For it cannot be denied that this was a prelude, or rather earnest, of the final resurrection for which we hope, such as already existed in Enoch and Elijah, whom Tertullian calls candidates for resurrection, because, exempted from corruption, both in body and soul, they were received into the custody of God.

8. I am ashamed to waste so many words on so clear a matter; but my readers will kindly submit to the annoyance, in order that perverse and presumptuous minds may not be able to avail themselves of any flaw to deceive the simple. The volatile spirits with whom I now dispute adduce the fiction of their own brain, that in the resurrection there will be a creation of new bodies. Their only reason for thinking so is, that it seems to them incredible that a dead body, long wasted by corruption, should return to its former state. Therefore, mere unbelief is the parent of their opinion. The Spirit of God, on the contrary, uniformly exhorts us in Scripture to hope for the resurrection of our flesh. For this reason Baptism is, according to Paul, a seal of our future resurrection; and in like manner the holy Supper invites us confidently to expect it, when with our mouths we receive the symbols of spiritual grace. And certainly the whole exhortation of Paul, "Yield ye your members as instruments of righteousness unto God," (Rom. 6:13), would be frigid, did he not add, as he does in another passage, "He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies," (Rom. 8:11). For what would it avail to apply feet, hands, eyes, and tongues, to the service of God, did not these afterwards participate in the benefit and reward? This Paul expressly confirms when he says, "The body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body. And God has both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power," (1 Cor. 6:13, 14). The words which follow are still clearer, "Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ?" "Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost?" (1 Cor. 6:15, 19). Meanwhile, we see how he connects the resurrection with chastity and holiness, as he shortly after includes our bodies in the purchase of redemption. It would be inconsistent with reason, that the body, in which Paul bore the marks of his Savior, and in which he magnificently extolled him (Gal. 6:17), should lose the reward of the crown. Hence he glories thus, "Our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body," (Phil. 3:20, 21). As it is true, "That we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God," (Acts 14:22); so it were unreasonable that this entrance should be denied to the bodies which God exercises under the banner of the cross and adorns with the palm of victory.

Accordingly, the saints never entertained any doubt that they would one day be the companions of Christ, who transfers to his own person all the afflictions by which we are tried, that he may show their quickening power.51[4] Nay, under the law, God trained the holy patriarch in this belief, by means of an external ceremony. For to what end was the rite of burial, as we have already seen, unless to teach that new life was prepared for the bodies thus deposited? Hence, also, the spices and other symbols of immortality, by which under the law the obscurity of the doctrine was illustrated in the same way as by sacrifices. That custom was not the offspring of superstition, since we see that the Spirit is not less careful in narrating burials than in stating the principal mysteries of the faith. Christ commends these last offices as of no trivial importance (Mt. 16:10), and that, certainly, for no other reason than just that they raise our eyes from the view of the tombs which corrupts and destroys all things, to the prospect of renovation. Besides, that careful observance of the ceremony for which the patriarchs are praised, sufficiently proves that they found in it a special and valuable help to their faith. Nor would Abraham have been so anxious about the burial of his wife (Gen. 23:4, 19), had not the religious views and something superior to any worldly advantage, been present to his mind; in other words, by adorning her dead body with the insignia of the resurrection, he confirmed his own faith, and that of his family. A clearer proof of this appears in the example of Jacob, who, to testify to his posterity that even death did not destroy the hope of the promised land, orders his bones to be carried thither. Had he been to be clothed with a new body would it not have been ridiculous in him to give commands concerning a dust which was to be reduced to nothing? Wherefore, if Scripture has any authority with us, we cannot desire a clearer or stronger proof of any doctrine. Even tyros understand this to be the meaning of the words, resurrection, and raising up. A thing which is created for the first time cannot be said to rise again; nor could our Savior have said, "This is the Father's will which has sent me, that of all which he has given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day," (John 6:39). The same is implied in the word sleeping, which is applicable only to the body. Hence, too, the name of cemetery, applied to burying-grounds.

It remains to make a passing remark on the mode of resurrection. I speak thus because Paul, by styling it a mystery, exhorts us to soberness, in order that he may curb a licentious indulgence in free and subtle speculation. First, we must hold, as has already been observed, that the body in which we shall rise will be the same as at present in respect of substance, but that the quality will be different; just as the body of Christ which was raised up was the same as that which had been offered in sacrifice, and yet excelled in other qualities, as if it had been altogether different. This Paul declares by familiar examples (1 Cor. 15:39). For as the flesh of man and of beasts is the same in substance, but not in quality: as all the stars are made of the same matter, but have different degrees of brightness: so he shows, that though we shall retain the substance of the body, there will be a change, by which its condition will become much more excellent. The corruptible body, therefore, in order that we may be raised, will not perish or vanish away, but, divested of corruption, will be clothed with incorruption. Since God has all the elements at his disposal, no difficulty can prevent him from commanding the earth, the fire, and the water, to give up what they seem to have destroyed. This, also, though not without figure, Isaiah testifies, "Behold, the Lore comes out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain," (Isa. 26:21). But a distinction must be made between those who died long ago, and those who on that day shall be found alive. For as Paul declares, "We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed," (1 Cor. 15:51); that is, it will not be necessary that a period should elapse between death and the beginning of the second life, for in a moment of time, in the twinkling of an eye, the trumpet shall sound, raising up the dead incorruptible, and, by a sudden change, fitting those who are alive for the same glory. So, in another passage, he comforts believers who were to undergo death, telling them that those who are then alive shall not take precedence of the dead, because those who have fallen asleep in Christ shall rise first (1 Thess. 4:15). Should any one urge the Apostle's declaration, "It is appointed unto all men once to die," (Heb. 9:27), the solution is easy, that when the natural state is changed there is an appearance of death, which is fitly so denominated, and, therefore, there is no inconsistency in the two things--viz. that all when divested of their mortal body shall be renewed by death; and yet that where the change is sudden, there will be no necessary separation between the soul and the body.

9. But a more difficult question here arises, How can the resurrection, which is a special benefit of Christ, be common to the ungodly, who are lying under the curse of God? We know that in Adam all died. Christ has come to be the resurrection and the life (John 11:25). is it to revive the whole human race indiscriminately? But what more incongruous than that the ungodly in their obstinate blindness should obtain what the pious worshipers of God receive by faith only? It is certain, therefore, that there will be one resurrection to judgment, and another to life, and that Christ will come to separate the kids from the goats (Mt. 25:32). I observe, that this ought not to seem very strange, seeing something resembling it occurs every day. We know that in Adam we were deprived of the inheritance of the whole world, and that the same reason which excludes us from eating of the tree of life excludes us also from common food. How comes it, then, that God not only makes his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, but that, in regard to the uses of the present life, his inestimable liberality is constantly flowing forth in rich abundance? Hence we certainly perceive, that things which are proper to Christ and his members, abound to the wicked also; not that their possession is legitimate, but that they may thus be rendered more inexcusable. Thus the wicked often experience the beneficence of God, not in ordinary measures, but such as sometimes throw all the blessings of the godly into the shade, though they eventually lead to greater damnation. Should it be objected, that the resurrection is not properly compared to fading and earthly blessings, I again answer, that when the devils were first alienated from God, the fountain of life, they deserved to be utterly destroyed; yet, by the admirable counsel of God, an intermediate state was prepared, where without life they might live in death. It ought not to seem in any respect more absurd that there is to be an adventitious resurrection of the ungodly which will drag them against their will before the tribunal of Christ, whom they now refuse to receive as their master and teacher. To be consumed by death would be a light punishment were they not, in order to the punishment of their rebellion, to be sisted before the Judge whom they have provoked to a vengeance without measure and without end. But although we are to hold, as already observed and as is contained in the celebrated confession of Paul to Felix, "That there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust," (Acts 24:15); yet Scripture more frequently sets forth the resurrection as intended, along with celestial glory, for the children of God only: because, properly speaking, Christ comes not for the destruction, but for the salvation of the world: and, therefore, in the Creed the life of blessedness only is mentioned.

10. But since the prophecy that death shall be swallowed up in victory (Hosea 13:14), will then only be completed, let us always remember that the end of the resurrection is eternal happiness, of whose excellence scarcely the minutes part can be described by all that human tongues can say. For though we are truly told that the kingdom of God will be full of light, and gladness, and felicity, and glory, yet the things meant by these words remain most remote from sense, and as it were involved in enigma, until the day arrive on which he will manifest his glory to us face to face (1 Cor. 15:54). "Now" says John, "are we the sons of God; and it does not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is," (1 John 3:2). Hence, as the prophets were unable to give a verbal description of that spiritual blessedness, they usually delineated it by corporeal objects. On the other hand, because the fervor of desire must be kindled in us by some taste of its sweetness, let us specially dwell upon this thought, If God contains in himself as an inexhaustible fountain all fulness of blessing, those who aspire to the supreme good and perfect happiness must not long for any thing beyond him. This we are taught in several passages, "Fear not, Abraham; I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward," (Gen. 15:1). With this accords David's sentiment, "The Lord is the portion of mine inheritance, and of my cup: thou maintainest my lot. The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places," (Ps. 16:5, 6). Again, "I shall be satisfied when I awake with thy likeness," (Ps. 17:15). Peter declares that the purpose for which believers are called is, that they may be "partakers of the divine nature," (2 Pet. 1:4). How so? Because "he shall come to be glorified in his saints and to be admired in all them that believe," (2 Thess. 1:10). If our Lord will share his glory, power, and righteousness, with the elect, nay, will give himself to be enjoyed by them; and what is better still, will, in a manner, become one with them, let us remember that every kind of happiness is herein included. But when we have made great progress in thus meditating, let us understand that if the conceptions of our minds be contrasted with the sublimity of the mystery, we are still halting at the very entrance.51[5] The more necessary is it for us to cultivate sobriety in this matter, lest unmindful of our feeble capacity we presume to take too lofty a flight, and be overwhelmed by the brightness of the celestial glory. We feel how much we are stimulated by an excessive desire of knowing more than is given us to know, and hence frivolous and noxious questions are ever and anon springing forth: by frivolous, I mean questions from which no advantage can be extracted. But there is a second class which is worse than frivolous; because those who indulge in them involve themselves in hurtful speculations. Hence I call them noxious. The doctrine of Scripture on the subject ought not to be made the ground of any controversy, and it is that as God, in the varied distribution of gifts to his saints in this world, gives them unequal degrees of light, so when he shall crown his gifts, their degrees of glory in heaven will also be unequal. When Paul says, "Ye are our glory and our joy," (1 Thess. 2:20), his words do not apply indiscriminately to all; nor do those of our Savior to his apostles, "Ye also shall sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel," (Mt. 19:28). But Paul, who knew that as God enriches the saints with spiritual gifts in this world, he will in like manner adorn them with glory in heaven, hesitates not to say, that a special crown is laid up for him in proportion to his labors. Our Savior, also, to commend the dignity of the office which he had conferred on the apostles, reminds them that the fruit of it is laid up in heaven. This, too, Daniel says, "They that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever," (Dan. 12:3). Any one who attentively considers the Scriptures will see net only that they promise eternal life to believers, but a special reward to each. Hence the expression of Paul, "The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day," (2 Tim. 1:18; 4:14). This is confirmed by our Savior's promise, that they "shall receive an hundredfold and shall inherit everlasting life," (Mt. 19:29). In short, as Christ, by the manifold variety of his gifts, begins the glory of his body in this world, and gradually increases it, so he will complete it in heaven.

11. While all the godly with one consent will admit this, because it is sufficiently attested by the word of God, they will, on the other hand, avoid perplexing questions which they feel to be a hindrance in their way, and thus keep within the prescribed limits. In regard to myself, I not only individually refrain from a superfluous investigation of useless matters, but also think myself bound to take care that I do not encourage the levity of others by answering them. Men puffed up with vain science are often inquiring how great the difference will be between prophets and apostles, and again, between apostles and martyrs; by how many degrees virgins will surpass those who are married; in short, they leave not a corner of heaven untouched by their speculations. Next it occurs to them to inquire to what end the world is to be repaired, since the children of God will not be in want of any part of this great and incomparable abundance, but will be like the angels, whose abstinence from food is a symbol of eternal blessedness. I answer, that independent of use, there will be so much pleasantness in the very sight, so much delight in the very knowledge, that this happiness will far surpass all the means of enjoyment which are now afforded. Let us suppose ourselves placed in the richest quarter of the globe, where no kind of pleasure is wanting, who is there that is not ever and anon hindered and excluded by disease from enjoying the gifts of God? who does not oftentimes interrupt the course of enjoyment by intemperance? Hence it follows, that fruition, pure and free from all defect, though it be of no use to a corruptible life, is the summit of happiness. Others go further, and ask whether dross and other impurities in metals will have no existence at the restitution, and are inconsistent with it. Though I should go so far as concede this to them, yet I expect with Paul a reparation of those defects which first began with sin, and on account of which the whole creation groaneth and travaileth with pain (Rom. 8:22). Others go a step further, and ask, What better condition can await the human race, since the blessing of offspring shall then have an end? The solution of this difficulty also is easy. When Scripture so highly extols the blessing of offspring, it refers to the progress by which God is constantly urging nature forward to its goal; in perfection itself we know that the case is different. But as such alluring speculations instantly captivate the unwary, who are afterwards led farther into the labyrinth, until at length, every one becoming pleased with his own views there is no limit to disputation, the best and shortest course for us will be to rest contented with seeing through a glass darkly until we shall see face to face. Few out of the vast multitude of mankind feel concerned how they are to get to heaven; all would fain know before the time what is done in heaven. Almost all, while slow and sluggish in entering upon the contest, are already depicting to themselves imaginary triumphs.

12. Moreover, as language cannot describe the severity of the divine vengeance on the reprobate, their pains and torments are figured to us by corporeal things, such as darkness, wailing and gnashing of teeth, inextinguishable fire, the ever-gnawing worm (Mt. 8:12; 22:13; Mark 9:43; Isa. 66:24). It is certain that by such modes of expression the Holy Spirit designed to impress all our senses with dread, as when it is said, "Tophet is ordained of old; yea, for the king it is prepared: he has made it deep and large; the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the Lord, like a stream of brimstone, does kindle it," (Isa. 30:33). As we thus require to be assisted to conceive the miserable doom of the reprobate, so the consideration on which we ought chiefly to dwell is the fearful consequence of being estranged from all fellowship with God, and not only so, but of feeling that his majesty is adverse to us, while we cannot possibly escape from it. For, first, his indignation is like a raging fire, by whose touch all things are devoured and annihilated. Next, all the creatures are the instruments of his judgment, so that those to whom the Lord will thus publicly manifest his anger will feel that heaven, and earth, and sea, all beings, animate and inanimate, are, as it were, inflamed with dire indignation against them, and armed for their destruction. Wherefore, the Apostle made no trivial declaration, when he said that unbelievers shall be "punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power," (2 Thess. 1:9). And whenever the prophets strike terror by means of corporeal figures, although in respect of our dull understanding there is no extravagance in their language, yet they give preludes of the future judgment in the sun and the moon, and the whole fabric of the world. Hence unhappy consciences find no rest, but are vexed and driven about by a dire whirlwind, feeling as if torn by an angry God, pierced through with deadly darts, terrified by his thunderbolts and crushed by the weight of his hand; so that it were easier to plunge into abysses and whirlpools than endure these terrors for a moment. How fearful, then, must it be to be thus beset throughout eternity! On this subject there is a memorable passage in the ninetieth Psalm: Although God by a mere look scatters all mortals, and brings them to nought, yet as his worshippers are more timid in this world, he urges them the more, that he may stimulate then, while burdened with the cross to press onward until he himself shall be all in all.

END OF BOOK THREE.



[1]

[5]10 510 2 Tim. 1:10; John 5:24; Eph. 2:6, 19; Rom. 7:16ñ18; Heb. 11:1; 2 Cor. 5:6; Col. 3:3; Titus 2:12.

[5]11 511 rench, "nous recevions un povre salaire de nostre laschetÈ et paresse;"--we receive a poor salary for our carelessness and sloth.

[5]12 512 Calvin translates. "Quis scit an hominis anima ascendit sursum?"--Who knows whether the soul of man goes upward? &c.

D101 D101 Chiliasm (from a Greek word meaning "a thousand") arose very early in the history of theology. Some of the early Church Fathers distinguished between a first and a second resurrection, and held that there would be an intervening millennial kingdom in which Christ would reign with His saints upon the earth. This view may be found in Papias, Irenaeus, Barnabas, Hermas, Justin Martyr, and Tertullian (all from the second century). But by the time of Luther and Calvin, the leading theologians (both Roman Catholic and Protestant) had rejected the doctrine of an earthly millennium. Calvin calls it a "fiction," and says that it is "too puerile to need or to deserve refutation."

D102 D102 Calvin's chief objection to "Chiliasm" appears to be alleged limitation, to a period of one thousand years, of the reign of Christ with His saints. A secondary objection arises out of his interpretation of Revelation 20:2ñ7 (in which the term "thousand years" appears six times) as referring to the Church militant in this world. These objections against "Chiliasm" would today apply only to that view of the last things called Premillennialism. However, if a person held (1) that Christ's kingdom is spiritually present, as He rules in the hearts of His elect; (2) that Christ's kingdom shall have a future, earthly manifestation, when He shall reign with His saints upon the earth; and (3) that Christ's kingdom will not cease at the close of the thousand years, but will merge into eternity; then it would appear that Calvin's chief objection to this view would be removed. Of course, his secondary objection would remain as a difference of hermeneutical (interpretive) approach and method.

[5]13 513 French, "La question quant au lieu est bien frivole et sotte: veu que nous savons que l'ame n'a pas ses mesures de long et de large, comme le corps;"--the question as to place is very frivolous and foolish, seeing we know that the sould has no measures of length and breadth like the body.

[5]14 514 Latin, "ut vivificas esse doceat"--French, "pour monstrer quells nous meinent [yacute] vie;"--to show that they conduct us to life.

[5]15 515 French, "Et encore quand nous aurons bien profitÈ en cette meditation, se nous faut il entendre que nous sommes encore tout au bas et [yacute] la premiere entree, et que jamais nous n'approcherons durant cette vie [yacute] la hautesse de ce mystere."--And still, when we shall have profited much by thus meditating, we must understand that we are still far beneath it, and at the very threshold, and that never during this life shall we approach the height of this mystery.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-7-20 00:15

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表