你們漏翻了幾個字:
In a Feb. 11, 2009 letter, Del Rosario said a recent site inspection conducted by DPL』s compliance staff revealed that the group was displaying two banners on their vehicles in the area.
Attorney Mark Hanson who represents the group responded to del Rosario's letter stating that the DPL could not prohibit the group from gathering. The CNMI government would be breaking the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
According to the Variety, in 2007 Attorney Hanson filed an Open Government Act request with the Governor's Office to determine whether there was an agreement between the CNMI and the Chinese government in "dealing with the Falun Gong," which is banned in China. He did not receive a reply. Why not? Isn't it a law that a reply must be made within ten days to an Open Government Act request?