倍可親

回復: 5
列印 上一主題 下一主題

美國海豹部隊的未來裝備

[複製鏈接]

10

主題

106

帖子

32

積分

貝殼新手上路

初過語言關(三級)

Rank: 2

積分
32
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
Arzel 發表於 2007-5-26 23:01 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
SEAL Insertion/ Harbor Patrol :

Number one long-term concern of the US Navy SEAL operative during small boat insertion ops is the accumlative effect of the constant pounding on his body. The average SEAL will complete his career one inch shorter than his enlistment height. Due soley to the never ending wave impact loads on his spine. Many admirable approaches have been made to mitigate shock loads to small boat combatants at the seat base. But the more logical approach would be to intercept the problem at its source; the sea-surface interaction zone. The SeaPhantom does this. Our craft rises to cruise above the average wave crests. And, we are a boat with a suspension system. A very serious suspension system. Non-corrosive fiberglass leaf springs, and 60,000 pond test billet-aluminum airbags for dampening effect absorb errant wave impact.

Servicemen assigned to patrol will be in far better shape to perform their duties if not beat into the ground during hours of small boat operation.


Future Force Multiplier Example:

SeaPhantom scaled up; (2 boats): 90'LOA x 34'BOA, 150 knot cruise, armed w/ ship-to-ship, surface-to-surface, surface-to-air systems, and six, internally deployable, 85 knot similarly armed drone craft-each (twelve drones, two mothers total). Acquisition cost similar to Blackhawk helicopter but yeilds force multiplier by factor of 30+. Blackhawk goes home after 2 hours- out of fuel. Indefinite loiter capability of our system puts them on station 8-to-12 hours or more. Unmannned drones indefinite. Effectively neutralizing a carrier battle group, or major national harbor for the price of a Blackhawk.

Assuming AWACS or JSTARS battle-theater control, with satellite downlink; cruise missle attack on the SeaPhantom system will fail. Simply vectors away @ 150knots from sub-sonic missle. Air-to-surface, ship-to-ship attacks fail against the SeaPhantom as well. Inherently low radar signature foils targeting systems. You cannot kill what you cannot target. Very high speed and extreme manuverability due to the craft's bank turn system foil manually targeted attempts. Ultra-high survival probabilities are apparent.

Our proprietary technology is available for rapid exploitation/deployment. All sub-systems are well proven, highly tested concepts. Designed in unique assemblege to produce a low-risk/ high-yeild developement program.

btw 請問怎樣貼圖...!??

[ 本帖最後由 Arzel 於 2007-5-27 21:26 編輯 ]

59

主題

4838

帖子

1084

積分

一星貝殼精英

Rank: 4

積分
1084
沙發
揚-- 發表於 2007-5-27 02:34 | 只看該作者
似乎見過。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

10

主題

106

帖子

32

積分

貝殼新手上路

初過語言關(三級)

Rank: 2

積分
32
3
 樓主| Arzel 發表於 2007-5-27 12:21 | 只看該作者
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

59

主題

4838

帖子

1084

積分

一星貝殼精英

Rank: 4

積分
1084
4
揚-- 發表於 2007-5-27 12:40 | 只看該作者
尋航能到150節有點變態。至於那些反導彈系統。。。感覺像擺設。海豹隊的特長就是瞞天過海。如果被發現,就不是躲過幾個尋航導彈就可以的事了。不過可以用來被發現后逃跑。

雷達很難追查,那像密集陣似的用紅外會不會查到?

總的來看性能是比直升機好了,但會不會在登陸或奪船的時候不方便上下?
是水手就要出海,
是男人就要迎風。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

10

主題

106

帖子

32

積分

貝殼新手上路

初過語言關(三級)

Rank: 2

積分
32
5
 樓主| Arzel 發表於 2007-5-28 22:17 | 只看該作者
原帖由 揚-- 於 2007-5-27 12:40 發表
..尋航能到150節有點變態。.....


btw 快過50knots 已經好辛苦....總的來看性能是比直升機好 !
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

59

主題

4838

帖子

1084

積分

一星貝殼精英

Rank: 4

積分
1084
6
揚-- 發表於 2007-5-29 00:59 | 只看該作者
感覺不如直升機方便。畢竟可以水陸兩用。登船也可以牽繩滑下,比較快。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-6-5 23:00

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表