含淚求助各位達人給我支招！拜託！再次拜託！

求助！美國法律有？還是沒有？天然蜂膠產品中中可以摻雜樹膠？

我向美國NBTY公司下訂單，訂了20多萬美元蜂膠硬膠囊。要求每粒500毫克膠囊中，含天然蜂膠125毫克，其餘375亳克為膠囊中各類填充物質，與NBTY公司在美國市場上同類產品一樣。NBTY公司生產完成後，把貨運輸到我指定的洛杉磯港口倉庫，NBTY公司隨貨有產品檢測合格報告，我付清了全部貸款。

我將其中一小部分運回中國，報關時海關檢測發現125毫克蜂膠中，摻雜了楊樹膠，二次檢測結果完全一樣，判定檢測產品不合格。海關不準該批產品進口，需要產品退回美國或者就地銷毀。

我將情況通報了NBTY公司，又在洛杉磯ABC實驗室再次對產品做了檢測，同樣發現蜂膠產品中摻雜了假蜂膠（揚樹膠），同樣把檢測報告電郵了NBTY公司。對方公司五個月時間沒有任何解釋和答覆，只好訴訟到洛杉磯聯邦法院！

今天上午十點在洛杉磯ADR主持下調解無果。對方提出理由是：美國法律對蜂膠中摻假蜂膠（楊樹膠）沒有法律約束，請求各位達人？我花的是天然蜂膠的錢（真蜂膠是200美元一公斤，楊樹膠10美元一公斤），因為法律沒有約束就可以摻雜楊樹㬵銷售嗎？我雖然請了律師，但想聽聽各位達人給我支招，聽聽達人們意見！含淚再此謝謝了！拜託！拜託！

下次法院仲裁開庭時間定於2015年6月18日，我得重新組織證據。

Tests Show Most Store Honey Isn』t Honey
Ultra-filtering Removes Pollen, Hides Honey Origins

BY ANDREW SCHNEIDER | NOVEMBER 7, 2011
More than three-fourths of the honey sold in U.S. grocery stores isn』t exactly what the bees produce, according to testing done exclusively for Food Safety News.

The results show that the pollen frequently has been filtered out of products labeled 「honey.」

The removal of these microscopic particles from deep within a flower would make the nectar flunk the quality standards set by most of the world』s food safety agencies.

The food safety divisions of the  World Health Organization, the European Commission and dozens of others also have ruled that without pollen there is no way to determine whether the honey came from legitimate and safe sources.

In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration says that any product that』s been ultra-filtered and no longer contains pollen isn』t honey. However, the FDA isn』t checking honey sold here to see if it contains pollen.

這是報道蜂蜜造假文章和釆訪蜜蜂專家：http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/11/tests-show-most-store-honey-isnt-honey/#.VLpyXNq9KSM

http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/11/tests-show-most-store-honey-isnt-honey/#.VLpyXNq9KSM

[img]http://www.foodsafetynews.com/food-safety-news-honey-samples-tested.pdf[/img]

美國是案例法嗎？可以參照嗎？