大乘經典也有聖戰的教義

我信古人，我信大藏經。
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 00:40

就是不信釋迦牟尼!

回復  chico
Without studying and knowing the ancient teachings of the Buddha preserved in the Pa ...
Guest from 99.227.40.x 發表於 2010-9-1 23:50

我說過了，大乘經典是給證得「人空「、「法空「 的羅漢們說的，為的是教他們求證「空有不二「，超越空有的對立、善惡的對立。
妄想、分別、執著一分沒斷的凡夫，還是先學如何做人。如何對五蘊是無常、是生滅，如實而知，如實而見，如實而覺、如實而慧、如實而無間吧。不然大乘經典讀不懂不說，還增加邪知見。

就是不信釋迦牟尼!
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 00:48

是你不信吧
你不會不知道，大藏經里經、律藏部分紀錄的是誰說過的話吧？

是你不信吧
你不會不知道，大藏經里經、律藏部分紀錄的是誰說過的話吧？
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 00:57

大般涅槃經是誰說過的話?

大般涅槃經是誰說過的話?
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 01:02

釋迦牟尼說的。

讀到狗肚子里去了
佛家經典在閣下那裡不是真理，否則也不會其佛從耶了。
我看你還是少攻擊大乘佛 ...
chico 發表於 2010-9-1 23:19

If it is difficult for you not to 罵人 now, could you pls start to learn to 罵人 without dirty words just to do a favor for everybady here?

回復 22# chico

Well, another example of Mahayana supremacy, what can I say? It is beyond doubts that this malicious statement from the Mahayana scriptures cannot be logically conceived in the teachings of the Buddha. I wonder how could anyone, someone who has studied Buddhism for a long time, insist to stand up for it, trying to rationalizing this statement, as if trying to make sense of some sort of irrationality that he himself is not truly buying it. This is nothing different than the literal Christian fundamentalist in the other room that thinks that the fellow humans, without having faith for Jesus Christ, cannot understand the Bible. Sighz.

我說過了，大乘經典是給證得「人空「、「法空「 的羅漢們說的，為的是教他們求證「空有不二「，超越空有 ...
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 00:50

This statement is only some sort of Mahayanists trying to trivialize the orthodox school of Buddhism they belittle as "Hinayana". The realization of sunyata, or sunyata, is built upon right understanding of the conventional truth. He sees clearly what is right, what is wrong; what will lead to happiness and liberation, and what do not.  Messing up the opposites, the unwholesome as wholesome, the man and the woman, and think that this is the supreme non-dual way in some Mahayanist philosophies, is totally a result of not seeing and knowing the things as they are, and do not understand the essence of 4 noble truths. In reality, according to the most accountable teachings in the Pali canons of Tipitaka, one attains arahantship or striving in the path of arahantship, can never be making any wishes to go on a 4-mahakappa long journey of bodhisattva path. This is totally a thick misunderstanding of most Mahayana buddhists that have no ideas of what an arahant is, and what the true liberation is all about.

If it is difficult for you not to 罵人 now, could you pls start to learn to 罵人 without dirty w ...
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 01:14

你問我大乘經典和阿含都讀到哪兒去了？
我回答讀到狗肚子里去了，哪裡罵你了！

你問我大乘經典和阿含都讀到哪兒去了？
我回答讀到狗肚子里去了，哪裡罵你了！
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 01:37

I suggested you 罵 yourself without dirty word.

回復 28# Guest from 99.227.40.x

個人有個人的看法，我不知道我的看法對錯與否。我僅僅如實表達我自己的看法而已。交流就是如是表達自己。
老兄你是不是寫漢字，這個英文搞的我有點連蒙代猜。

雜阿含看了一部分，對我蠻有啟發的。

I suggested you 罵 yourself without dirty word.
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 01:46

狗，不臟。比某些人還乾淨不知多少倍。

狗，不臟。比某些人還乾淨不知多少倍。
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 02:13

比你?

比你?
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 02:15

請問如何比法？給個提示

請問如何比法？給個提示
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 02:25

cleaner or dirtier.

cleaner or dirtier.
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 02:32

不知道。

不知道。
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 02:36

then how do you know 比某些人還乾淨不知多少倍?

then how do you know 比某些人還乾淨不知多少倍?
jiandao 發表於 2010-9-2 02:39

靠欺騙輿論發動戰爭的人。

釋迦牟尼說的。
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 01:05

    ok, but 我不敢誹謗釋迦牟尼.

靠欺騙輿論發動戰爭的人。
chico 發表於 2010-9-2 03:15

ok,for example,為護正法,有眾生謗大乘者,以鞭撻苦加治之或奪其命,欲令改往遵修善法的人.