一位網友看了這個視頻后,提出一個問題:
這傢伙怎麼這麼聰明又會搞笑?
how is this guy so smart and funny at the same time?
然後引來下面的回復和討論:
他是個讓人想入非非的人。
He's a panty soaker(美俚,讓女性內褲濕透的人,指那種女人一見就想做愛的男性; 讓女人春心泛濫的男人,顯然這裡是比喻他有讓人們想入非非與其親近的魅力)
他是個機器人
Hes a robot
他是亞洲人
Hes asian
沒有人曾經說過。讓我們離開這個UBI狗屎並開始談論自動化豪華共產主義。楊是資本主義的騙子,他不明白資本主義已經完了。
Nothing no one has ever said before. And lets get off this UBI shit and start talking about Automated Luxury Communism. Yang is a capitalist grafter who dont understand that capitalism is finished.
因為你基本上長的是是土豆(腦袋)
Because youre basically a potato
噴子?讓我們分享我們的工作,並在UBI之前獲得4小時的工作日。
Troll? Lets share the work we have and get a 4 hour work day before UBI.
作為一個工會會員,我支持一個4個小時的工作日,但這並不是打擊楊的理由。他是這個國家正確方向的開端。
as a unionist I support a 4 hour work day, that's not a reason to bash on Yang though. He's the start of a right direction for this country.
他是一位風險投資家。他說這不是關於社會主義與資本主義的關係而其實就是。它仍然是關於生產資料的所有權,他理解但是想用1000美元賄賂工人階級,所以我們不去追求真正價值創造的地方
He is a venture capitalist. He says its not about socialism vs capitalism when it is. Its still about the ownership of the means of production and he understands that but wants to bribe the working class with 1000 dollars so we dont go after the places where the real value is created.
問題是美國沒有人能保證找到工作,你得必須被選中。 UBI保證給每個人,並且是一個更健全的解決方案。沒有人被排除在外!
The problem with that is no one in America is guaranteed a job, you have to be picked. UBI is guaranteed to everyone and is a more sound solution. No one is excluded!
Bernie Sanders將保證給每個人一份工作,比這個UBI更好。然後我們可以分享所需的工作。楊想要一個失敗的系統來分配工作。
為什麼我們不能同時擁有?工作保證和UBI。
Bernie Sanders will guarantee a job to everyone, much better than this UBI thing. And then we can share the work that is needed. Yang wants a failed system to distribute work.
Why can』t we have both? A jobs guarantee and UBI.
他是一個有趣的亞洲人。而亞洲人是聰明的。因此,他既聰明又有趣。
He's a funny Asian guy. And Asians are smart by default. Therefore, he is smart and funny at the same time
一遍又一遍地粘貼相同的評論。明顯的噴子!當你開始接受自由紅利時,你可能不會為了生存而過上有尊嚴的生活。
Copy pasting the same comment over and over. Obvious troll is obvious! May be you won't have to troll for survival and live with dignity when you start receiving the Freedom Dividend.
因為他確實聰明。
Because he's genuinely smart.
他很聰明,聰明的人通常很有趣,因為他們知道如何控制自己的語氣以及說些什麼來搞笑。
He's just smart as smart people are generally funny as they know how to control their tone and what to say in order to be funny.
楊是伯尼2.0。 #Yanggangnamstyle
Yang is Bernie 2.0. #Yanggangnamstyle
楊是資本家他媽的騙子。一個戀童癖的自由主義者混球兒。
Yang is a capitalist f***ing grifter. A pedophile libertarian scumgbag.
他是一個他媽的卑鄙小人。
He is a f***ing scumbag.
戀童癖者?你今天吃藥了嗎
A pedophile? Have you taken your medication today?
像這樣的人確實存在!
People like this do exist!!!
他不是律師而是工程師。這就是為什麼。美國總統需要一名工程師!
He is an engineer not a lawyer. That's why. America needs an engineer for president!
Rojava很奇怪。他是一個噴子。
wow Rojava is weird. He is a troll.
我就這麼說吧.....這是他的星座的一部分
I'm just going to throw this one in...it's part of his zodiac sign
經濟學教授Pavlina Tcherneva實際上有一個現實的,可行的生活工資工作保證計劃,反周期運行,以便它不會創造比所需要的更多或更少的工作,但是非自願失業和貧困的NOBODY被排除在外。這是伯尼桑德斯贊成的計劃。
Economics professor Pavlina Tcherneva actually DOES have a realistic, workable living wage Job Guarantee plan that runs counter-cyclical so that it never creates more or less jobs than what are needed, but NOBODY who is involuntarily unemployed and poor gets left out. This is the plan Bernie Sanders favors.
像楊一樣的UBI推動者都聲稱那些被迫退出經濟的人(許多人因為年齡歧視而無法獲得新的工作 - 除了性別和種族歧視之外),貧困人口為1000美元/ mo UBI是不夠的,如果他們需要更多的錢,總是「選擇工作」。但那是胡說八道,因為真正自由選擇是否工作的只有富人。
UBI pushers like Yang all claim those whose who've been pushed out of the economy (many have already been left jobless and unable to get new employment due to age discrimination - on top of gender and race discrimination) for whom the sub-poverty $1,000/mo UBI isn't enough can always "choose to work" if they need more money. But that's bullshit because the ONLY people who truly are free to choose whether or not to work are the rich.
找工作的最終選擇是誰和僱主沒有100%的關係 - 不是那些迫切需要工作但卻沒有被僱用的人(最常見的原因是歧視 - 科技行業因此而臭名昭著它被寵壞了豐富的兄弟會男孩文化的自我權利和白人男性至上主義)。
The ultimate choice in who gets a job and who doesn't rests 100% with the employers - NOT the person who desperately needs a job, but isn't getting hired (most often due to discrimination - for which the tech industry is notorious with its spoiled rich frat boy culture of self-entitlement and white male supremacy).
Pavlina Tcherneva的工作保障計劃為那些無法工作的人(老年人和殘疾人)或無法就業的人(孕婦,新媽媽和殘疾人和照顧者)提供適宜的收入支持(生活工資BI)家庭成員)。與楊的獨立UBI計劃不同,Pavlina Tcherneva的工作保障計劃為那些無法就業的人提供基本收入的生活工資水平,同時確保那些想要工作但卻是「最後僱用的人」的人,首先被解僱的「傳統邊緣化群體的群體似乎總是被排除在外,實際上可以獲得生活工資並為自己過上好日子。
Pavlina Tcherneva's Jobs Guarantee plan provides a livable income support (a living wage BI) for those who can't work (the old & the disabled) or for whom employment is not feasible (pregnant women, new moms, and caregivers of disabled and ill family members). Unlike Yang's stand-alone UBI plan, Pavlina Tcherneva's Jobs Guarantee plan offers a living wage level of a basic income to those for whom employment is not feasible while it ensures that those who WANT to work but who are members of the "last-hired, first-fired" cohort of traditionally marginalized people that always seem to get left out, CAN actually get a living wage job and make a good life for themselves.
楊的UBI不僅沒有減少或消除貧困,也沒有消除技術上的工作歧視。它會滋生那些只剩下貧窮的貧困UBI的人們的憤懣,沸騰的怨恨,他們沒有機會獲得更多的生活和更好的生活,對於那些剛開始獲得豐厚薪水的少數特權精英而言平均入門水平為15萬美元/年。
Yang's UBI not only fails to reduce or eliminate poverty, it also fails to eliminate job discrimination in tech. And it will breed smoldering, seething resentment from those who will be left with nothing but a shitty sub-poverty UBI with no chance of ever getting more and having a good life, towards the privileged elite employed few who get fat salaries that start out at the entry level of $150K/yr on average.
楊的計劃在數量過於吝嗇的情況下進一步失敗的地方,就是它的資金來源:累退稅。增值稅是銷售稅,而那些窮人的收入比富人的收入更大。楊說這些技術巨頭將被徵收增值稅,這隻會提高他們所有商品和服務的價格,這些商品和服務會傳遞給其他所有人 - 包括那些最不能負擔得起的人。他想給貧窮的非自願失業者提供貧困的UBI,然後讓我們面對倒退的稅收計劃來支付它。並且大多數人都對楊的新自由主義特洛伊木馬的UBI計劃感到高興,要麼太愚蠢,要麼以自我為中心(或兩者兼而有之)才能看到這一點,而且我沒有情感資本來度過無數小時的MY時間(我沒有得到報酬)試圖教育他們這個狗屎當我的神經已經從由於缺乏任何收入作為一個合法失明,慢性病52歲的老婦人的赤貧的長期壓力射擊沒有工作機會,沒有錢,沒有他媽的汽車(它被收回),並且在我76歲的殘疾丈夫無家可歸的邊緣,無處可去。
Where Yang's plan further fails on top of being too stingy in amount, is how it is funded: regressive taxes. VAT taxes ARE sales taxes, and those take a bigger bite out of a poor person's income than a rich person's. These tech giants that Yang is saying will be hit with the VAT tax will simply raise the prices for all their goods and services, which gets passed onto everyone else - including those least able to afford it. He wants to give poor involuntarily jobless people a sub-poverty UBI, then club us in the face with a regressive tax scheme to pay for it. And most of the people that are all ga-ga over Yang's neoliberal Trojan Horse of a UBI plan are either too stupid or self-centered (or both) to see that and I don't have the emotional capital to spend countless hours of MY time (for which I'm NOT getting paid) in trying to educate them on this shit when my nerves are already shot from the chronic stress of abject poverty due to lack of any income as a legally blind, chronically ill 52 yr old woman with no chance for a job, no money, no f***in' car anymore (it got repossessed), and on the verge of homelessness with my 76 yr old disabled husband and nowhere to go.
那麼人類作為其他人的有償奴隸工作是你的最終解決方案嗎?!!我們已經有了這個,除了富人之外,他們可以選擇他們的奴隸。按照你的計劃,他們會排隊等候。這是地球,她的資源屬於我們所有人。我們需要提出一種更公平的方式來分享它們。我今年60歲,是一名呼叫中心工作人員。我們以前能夠賺到現金最少的錢。工資是大多數公司提供的。我帶著youtube去學習一項新技能來補充我的收入,這是我非常喜歡做的事情。我無法做到足以支持它。我自己。我為一些上癮的人工作,他們認為我或我做的事情沒什麼價值,他們付錢給我。根據楊的計劃,我可以購買一些希望讓我離開種植園的設備。工作是人類的發明。你有沒有見過猴子買香蕉或蜘蛛買房子。楊的計劃雖然不完美,但卻是一個很好的開端。我不了解你,但工作建築重建美國搖搖欲墜的基礎設施並不吸引人,好吧!
So humans working as paid slaves for other humans is your final solution?!! We already have that, with the exception of the rich get to pick their slaves. With your plan, they'll be lined up and waiting. This is planet Earth and her resources belong to all of us. We need to come up with a more equitable way to share them. I am 60 years old and a call center worker. We used to be able to make good money that now min. wage is what most companies offer. I took to youtube to learn a new skill to supplement my income and it's something I thoroughly enjoy doing. I can't make enough to off of it to support. myself as of yet. I work for some money addicted humans who see little value in me or what I do and they pay me accordingly. With Yang's plan, I can buy some equipment that will hopefully get me off of the plantation. Work is a human invention. Have you ever seen a monkey buy a banana or a spider buy a house. Yang's program while not perfect, is a great beginning. I don't know about you, but working construction rebuilding America's crumbling infrastructure is not appealing, OK!!
他家鄉是Schenectady,就是這個原因 (這是楊安澤的出生地,在紐約上州)
Hes from Schenectady that's why
因為你只想要最低收入,而他希望ubi能夠使人員資金流動,這才是目的...
哦,伯尼會為每個人保證工作嗎?!笑死人,比楊安澤整個視頻 講的什麼都都更搞笑哦。
because ur a guy who only wants the bare minimum, he wants the ubi to get ppl moving which this will do...
oh Bernie will guarantee a job for EVERYONE?! Lmfao that was funnier than anything yang said this entire video
我為大家發聲。白痴快他媽閉嘴。
I'll say it for everyone. Shut the f*** up, moron
任何「工作」計劃的問題是假設「工作」將始終是必要的人類功能或已經是一個。我們正在進入自動化,機器人和A.I.的豐富時代。將使大部分工作變得不必要那麼解決方案是什麼?這是地球,她的資源屬於我們所有人。找到一種公平的方式來共享資源是關鍵。工作的想法是一種方式,但還有其他方式。在自然界,你有沒有見過猴子買香蕉或蜘蛛買它的房子?
The problem with any "jobs" program is assuming that "work" will always be a necessary human function or that it is already one. We are entering an age of abundance where automation, robotics and A.I. will make most work unnecessary. So then what is the solution? This is planet Earth and her resources belong to us all. Finding an equitable way to share the resources is key. The idea of work is one way but there are others. In the natural world, have you ever seen a monkey buy a banana or a spider buy it's house?
他是那些少數擁有智力和魅力組合天賦的人之一。
He』s one of those rare people who』ve been gifted with the intellect AND charisma combo.
因為他向窮人提供免費的東西以換取選票。
Because he offers free stuff to poor people in exchange for votes.
有趣的是,這兩者經常相吻合。2020選楊!
Funny how often those two coincide.
Yang2020!
不選楊, 毋寧死!
Give me Yang, or give me death!
要是民主黨全國委員會阻擋楊安澤提名,我向天發誓會轉投川普!!!
If DNC blocks Andrew Yang's nomination, I swear to God I'll vote for Trump!!!
Curt Lemons反對川普,後者由富人選舉以換取富人減稅
Curt Lemons as opposed to trump who got elected by rich people in exchange for rich people tax cuts
不。政客們都是一樣的。他們說任何可能的當選,並對每個人徵稅。川普做到了這一點,而楊可能也是如此。最有可能的是,任何有工作或收入的人最有可能在陽氣下支付更多。為什麼不給那些失去工作崗位的人提供稅收抵免或提高就業支出?可能是因為這不會有借口收取過多的稅款。而另一方面,有傳言稱技術在過去300年或第一次工業革命中就業。但事情並未發生。它通常是豐富的原因和時代。不幸的是,他的「數據驅動」工作理論來自基於恐懼的觀點。
No.. Politicians are all the same. They say whatever possible to get elected and raise taxes on everyone. Trump did it and Yang will probably be the same. Most likely, any person with a job or income will most likely pay more under yang. Why not just give tax credits or raise the un employment payout to people who lost there jobs to tech? Probably because that wouldn't involve an excuse to collect an excessive amount or taxes. And on another note, there's been rumors of technology taking jobs for the last 300 years or since the first industrial revolution.. It hasn't happened. It usually causes and era of abundance. Unfortunately, his "data driven" job theory is from fear based opinions.
相信他熟悉較高的整體水平的能力,人們與較低的社會壓力水平相關。我相信,如果我們的社會走上正軌,恐懼和憂慮減少,我們就會變得更加高級,感覺好像我們經歷了一次進化的醒來。預測地球的繁榮,並發現我們的人類代碼是為了拯救地球並幫助我們宇宙中的任何生命,將來通過糾正其代碼,如果看起來合適,我正在考慮人類的超級進步和地球上的集體共存。
I believe he is familiar with abilities in higher conciosness levels and people relate with lower levels of societal stresses. I believe if our society was on the right track, fear and worries being diminished we would literally become more advanced and feel as if we where experiencing an evolutionary wake up. projecting prosperity for earth and finding that our human code is to save earth and help any life in our universe, in the future by correcting its code if seen fit, I'm thinking super advancements for humans and collective coexistence on earth.
很多喜劇演員都很聰明,不僅要愚蠢,還需要智慧才能讓人發笑。
Many comedians are smart,it takes not only stupidity but intelligence too to make someone laugh.
伯尼桑德斯後來傷了他的支持者的心,要求他們支持希拉里,這可是在她和民主黨全國委員會耍了他之後。他媽的,(他自己)一生都沒有做過體面的工作!
Bernie sanders stab his supporters in the back asking them to support Hillary after what her and the dnc did to him. f*** him, did'nt work a decent Job in his life!
(又一個)奧巴馬
Obama
我愛他! :)這將是我第一次投票給某人......這可不是兩惡相權取其輕......
I love him! :) This will be the first time I've ever voted FOR someone...not just picked the lesser of the evils...
他是一位成功的企業家
Hes a successful entrepreneur
他是一個標界。
He is a Demarcate.
安德魯楊不是個戲子。
Andrew Yang is no showman.
真正聰明的人通常都特風趣。
truly smart people are usually pretty darn funny.