-
已有(27)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 28樓 遊客 (2001:5b0:x:x:f506) ] 發表於
- 非常精彩!!! 中國共產黨如今到了向全體中國人民歷史性大贖罪的大好機會. 胡錫進是這場中 - 美之間世界歷史大戲的非正式報幕員: 第一次以非官方的方式, 輕描淡寫地報道了中國軍隊可能以何種步驟與真正的對手--美國老大如何在台灣大劇場上演舉世矚目的對手戲. 我深知共產黨很少講真話, 但這次講的內容是出自內心的自信. 因為, 如今的美國絕對, 絕對, 絕對不敢在中國的家門口為了台灣而與中國軍隊"血拚"!
- 回復 舉報 [ 27樓 遊客 (76.122.x.x) ] 發表於
- 和平上岸，圍而不打，太仁慈了，是無用功。對兇惡的台獨們絕不適用。可以只打不上岸。打趴軍事的所有設施，大量消滅軍事人員及台獨重要人員，摧毀所有海陸空重要軍事武器。還不投降，進一步摧毀基礎設施，機場港口，軌道交通，高速公路，能源儲存，加工，運輸系統。水的給排系統在台獨頑抗抵制時可以予以摧毀。
- 回復 舉報 [ 23樓 NO_meansNO ] 發表於
- 要蔡英文有堂堂正正總統不當，去當水利部長，一輩子低三下四，胡錫進你想得美。
- 回復 舉報 [ 19樓 遊客 (2606:6000:x:x::6561) ] 發表於
- 共匪雖然在大陸不得人心，但在反台獨，維護國家領土完整上和13億中國人民還是一致的，中共打台灣，政權不會倒，如果中共政權允許台灣獨立，那1000%會倒台，並且倒得很慘。
- 回復 舉報 [ 18樓 遊客 (72.139.x.x) ] 發表於
- Not exactly as same as Beijing in 1945, Because 1) Beijing 1945 was a real war. 2) both sides were enemies. 3) the city was totally under siege. 4) The city surrendered. Now, the case of Taiwan would be opposite due to 1) It is not a war. It is both sides working to solve a historical problem. 2) Both sides are brothers and sisters, not enemies. 3) The island is not under siege. The island is as free as ever. Both sides working on reunification because it is good for the future of all Chinese. 4) The island of Taiwan won't be in terms of surrender. It will be in terms of reunification as same as home coming. Every body on both sides would be very happy to see it happened. It is a happy event . This is the fact, and the prospect is good of the way it's going. Proud to be Chinese. mak