倍可親

我也在這裡補充幾句廢話

作者:roaming  於 2010-9-20 20:55 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

通用分類:熱點雜談|已有83評論

關鍵詞:

這裡是網友評論第2頁,點擊查看原文

發表評論 評論 (83 個評論)

回復 溪水牡丹 2010-9-20 23:17
哈哈哈,這就是你的拿手伎倆哈?
反正知道你已經披盔戴甲了,那就不客氣了
接好了,哈哈哈。。。
回復 方方頭 2010-9-20 23:20
還真是廢話哈哈
回復 roaming 2010-9-20 23:21
方方頭: 還真是廢話哈哈
還是你理解到位,全部是廢話!
回復 jiandao 2010-9-21 00:28
真水無香紫金媛: 寫得好!實際!哪個不想出來打一架,但要有把握呢!要不然老百姓就慘了!歷來都是這樣的,損失更重。
you are right.
回復 kala2009 2010-9-21 00:48
惡有惡報,善有善報,不是不報,時候沒到!
回復 雲間鶴 2010-9-21 01:05
喬雨風: 得了吧。
不敢拼一下永遠受欺負。
難道我們的相對國力 (實力) 還不如抗美援朝時期。
你組織個義勇軍吧!
回復 BL_518 2010-9-21 01:07
可憐之人必有可恨之處~~

有最新消息傳來,中方已派遣漁政執法船前往相關海域,「目的是維護相關海域的漁業生產秩序,保護中國漁民生命財產安全。」 這是正確的一步。希望能藉此,讓日本人改變中國在釣魚島問題上「軟弱無能」之舊印象,而心有忌憚,不敢妄行;也希望此舉能增加中方在日後談判中的籌碼~~
回復 RuudGullit 2010-9-21 01:17
問題是,日本根本就算不上啥「村裡的惡霸」,頂多也就是個小混混(背後可能有惡霸撐腰)。對於這樣小混混的挑釁,只有狠狠收拾,收拾得越狠越好(這樣給他撐腰的惡霸要動手也得掂量掂量)。否則一味的忍讓、到處叫痛,不光讓人恥笑,還會讓其他的小混混(印度、越南、菲律賓、印尼、馬來西亞、韓國)覺得你好欺負,以後就別想有安寧日子過了。
我覺得這方面還是要學俄羅斯,北方四島問題,日本人敢說個不字嗎?喬治亞不聽話,說打就打了,別的國家哪個敢跳出來反對?
這些道理,連我這樣的老百姓都能想到,政府應該早就看到這些了吧?難道真像大家說得那樣,是在下一盤我們看不懂的,很大的棋?
回復 snortbsd 2010-9-21 01:17
roaming: 我這文章是在釣魚,其實,這次中國軍很強硬。搞不好就會有局部衝突。
我個人認為,日本這次太不明智,低估了中國!
japs didn't use military. it was japs version of coast guard. why should china use 中國軍?????

what china should do is, from now on, keep sending 漁政執法船 in that area and keep sending fishing boats to that area....
回復 snortbsd 2010-9-21 01:19
雲間鶴: 你組織個義勇軍吧!
if it was the matter of land force, it would not be as thorny as it is...
回復 snortbsd 2010-9-21 01:19
roaming: 我這文章是在釣魚,其實,這次中國軍很強硬。搞不好就會有局部衝突。
我個人認為,日本這次太不明智,低估了中國!
japs didn't use military. it was japs version of coast guard. why should china use 中國軍?????

what china should do is, from now on, keep sending 漁政執法船 in that area and keep sending fishing boats to that area....
回復 RuudGullit 2010-9-21 01:33
snortbsd: japs didn't use military. it was japs version of coast guard. why should china use 中國軍?????

what china should do is, from now on, keep sending 漁
Thing is, China does not have its version of 'coast guard' or whatsoever, and since the island is deemed as Chinese territory, therefore it is justifiable to send military forces patroling the area to ensure the safety of Chinese citizens and their properties.
Literally, the 漁政執法船 (Fishery Law Enforcement Ship), sounds more like the a '城管' ship, a civilian vessel that needs protection itself. So how can we rely on such a thing to protect the integrity of the territory?
回復 snortbsd 2010-9-21 03:04
RuudGullit: Thing is, China does not have its version of 'coast guard' or whatsoever, and since the island is deemed as Chinese territory, therefore it is justif
in terms of oceanic science, china is so far behind you just can't imagine. how many oceanic scientists does china have? very few. how many departments of oceanic science do chinese universities have? not even double digits.

do you really think american/japnese have powerful navies because they have more powerful ships? wrong, wrong, wrong!!! because they know the ocean like their backyards...

we don't know the ocean as we as we should, we don't know that part of properties that  belong to us. oceanic science isn't something glamorous, important for most of chinese. qingdao has a university specialized in oceanic science but hardly anyone knows it; let alone it alwasy had tough time to get highly qualified students each year.

we are only pissed off when things went bad, instead of we should sharpen our tools for right time. on this issue, we have only one fight. without right tools, well sharpened swords, you can't slay the dragon!!!

talk is cheap. as far as i see it: we keep this low level activities going until...

we must raise the awareness of ocean science, put more resources on that subject, build more schools and have more scholars for oceanic science. those are fundamental steps for a powerful navy.
回復 snortbsd 2010-9-21 03:15
roaming: 我這文章是在釣魚,其實,這次中國軍很強硬。搞不好就會有局部衝突。
我個人認為,日本這次太不明智,低估了中國!
well, you can't bet this on 也不會有大事情. if that so, we surely would be loser...

for engineers, we always consider the worst case scenarios...

for a military operation, you always have to consider all of possibilities...
回復 雲間鶴 2010-9-21 03:20
snortbsd: if it was the matter of land force, it would not be as thorny as it is...
China then has no way out!
回復 小由 2010-9-21 03:53
roaming: 我個人認為日方是不理智的。中國顯然不是十年前的中國。中國現在是鷹派抬頭,搞不好會有大動作!但就是不說!
不會有大動作的。您放心。
回復 真水無香紫金媛 2010-9-21 04:17
jiandao: you are right.
夠兄弟,站在我這邊!
回復 jiandao 2010-9-21 04:27
真水無香紫金媛: 夠兄弟,站在我這邊!
of cause I go with you. Can you expect an illeagal government (I mean it is not elected) will go very far while it deals with such things?
回復 roaming 2010-9-21 04:29
小由: 不會有大動作的。您放心。
只能走著瞧了!
回復 真水無香紫金媛 2010-9-21 04:30
jiandao: of cause I go with you. Can you expect an illeagal government (I mean it is not elected) will go very far while it deals with such things?
you are right

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-4-30 22:28

返回頂部