發表評論 評論 (183 個評論)
- 回復 xqw63
- fanlaifuqu: 但不管如何，咱是英雄的朋友哦，還是球友、熟人、老相識、……（還有什麼可以拉近關係的名詞，請讀者幫咱想一想，啥？親人？那樣不好吧，有點誇大其辭了，咱很不
這不是套近乎嗎？
- 回復 在美一方
- xqw63: HIV positive的人咬人不應該有問題，咱今天碰到他和他說一聲The risk of HIV infection from a human bite is between 0.1% and 1%.
- 回復 xqw63
- 在美一方: The risk of HIV infection from a human bite is between 0.1% and 1%.0.1% and 1%.
這個數字咱很懷疑，因為，樣本量太小，無法統計
- 回復 在美一方
- xqw63: 0.1% and 1%.http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/218901-treatment
這個數字咱很懷疑，因為，樣本量太小，無法統計
check it out yourself. It is a serious concern for managing human bite. Don't draw conclusion based on your imagination, listen to CDC's recommendation. For your friend's sake and his family, you never can be too serious.
Seriously, how do you know "樣本量太小，無法統計"?
- 回復 xqw63
- 在美一方: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/218901-treatment被人咬幾率本身就小，被HIV positive人咬當然幾率更小，加上能夠肯定被這樣的人咬而導致自己患上HIV的證據鏈根本就無法證明，所以，很難肯定就是被咬而導致的HIV感染
check it out yourself. It is a serious concern for managing human bite. Don't draw conclusion
- 回復 在美一方
- xqw63: 被人咬幾率本身就小，被HIV positive人咬當然幾率更小，加上能夠肯定被這樣的人咬而導致自己患上HIV的證據鏈根本就無法證明，所以，很難肯定就是被咬而導致的HIyou probably need to research on data regarding human bites before drawing wild conclusion. I've no interest in arguing with you. only provide some info to your friend, which might be ignored by his doc.
- 回復 xqw63
- 在美一方: you probably need to research on data regarding human bites before drawing wild conclusion. I've no interest in arguing with you. only provide some i多謝，咱也不是要爭論，咱一定把你的建議告訴哥們，不過，這哥們是MD、PHD，Assitant Professor，他應該了解
