|
|
所有關於學員成為活體器官供應者的來源有兩個：
1， 大紀元的文章。查wikipedia，發現，大紀元的指控經過多方調查無法成立。
「Harry Wu, known for his investigations of Laogai, was also skeptical of the claims. He claims to have sent investigators to the Sujiatun scene, on March 12th, 3 days after the story surfaced, but did not find evidence for the alleged concentration camp.[13] He said the story was merely hearsay from two witnesses: "No pictures, no witnesses, no paperwork, no detailed information at all, nothing."[14]
David Kilgour accounted for Wu's apparent lack of evidence by contending that by March 9 「the whistle was blown.」[15] Kilgour and Matas later accused Wu of bad faith for drawing his conclusions without interviewing the witnesses, though Wu maintained that he was denied access to them.[16]
The United States Department of State reported the findings of its investigation in April, stating that U.S. representatives "found no evidence to support allegations... that the site is being used for any function other than as a normal public hospital." US embassy said their staff visited the site twice, the first time unannounced one week after the report surfaced, the second with official cooperation after three weeks.[17][18]「
2， 另一廣泛流傳的所謂確鑿證據來源是「former Canadian MP David Kilgour and Human Rights Lawyer David Matas 「他們發表了一份把各種所謂證據拼湊一起的報告「 Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong「讀其調查你會發現：
1，此兩人對中國有極大的政治偏見。一個無法中立的人如何能客觀的來進行調查呢？
2，兩人跟本沒去過中國。所有的證據都是道聽途說，把枝零破碎的所謂證據拼湊一起，然後武斷得出結論。
比如這段：Of 60,000 organ transplants officially recorded between 2000 and 2005, 18,500 came from identifiable sources; the source of 41,500 transplant organs could not thus be explained. In a later article published in 2007, Kilgour and Matas say that traditional sources of transplants such as executed prisoners, donors, and the brain dead "come nowhere near to explaining the total number of transplants across China." They said that "the only other identified source which can explain the skyrocketing transplant numbers is Falun Gong practitioners."
由於大量的人體器官來源不明，其報告得出的結論就是「修鍊者成了器官移植活體提供者。這種草率的結論不具有說服力。
那麼轉頭看國內，國內關於如何預防國內器官移植犯罪的論文，似乎可以看到有些犯罪團伙做人體器官的買賣。（是否有地方醫院，官員捲入有待調查）但是和掛不上邊。
想起幾年前，在國內時候，雖然私自買賣器官是非法並禁止的，但是還是可以看到各大醫院有人自願買器官的廣告等。比如，家窮，賣一隻腎臟。不排除有非法買賣器官的可能？但是和貼不上邊。
還有就是中國國內簽署死亡后器官自願捐贈者正在逐年增多。和美國獲得架照後有很多人自願捐獻某部分器官差不多。
更搞笑的是，有如一個瀋陽的日資企業在華涉嫌非法人體器官買賣也被做為是中國政府活體器官買賣的證據。
好的是，中國已出台相關器官移植法律。
（另：我不介意摘除被處決的囚犯的器官來救治好人，當然如果其簽署死後器官捐獻的協議才好，但是西方人認為死囚也好，動物也好，要簽署了器官捐獻的協議才好把他們的器官挪用。）
有些西人，多中國的定義就是「獨裁，專制，沒有言論自由，沒有人權「，中國是有很多的社會問題，哪個國家又沒有呢？ |
|
狗仔卡
樓主
