|
|
51# 信仰平等
我的直覺很準確啊. J. Daryl Charles 果真認為聖戰是魔鬼的理論哈. 我懷疑你老兄到底看了這本書沒有,就在這忽悠我?看樣子我給自己戴的武斷的帽子得給你戴上了.你可不要推辭啊!
"his reasoning would have us believe that if we object to a military invasion of a country to depose a totalitarian ruler, then we must also believe that it is also wrong for a national police force to capture and imprison a serial rapist. This is obviously absurd, yet his craftiness in writing inevitably leads to this kind of conjecture.
While Charles goes to some length to describe how evil the terrorists are, and how they must be opposed in order to protect the innocent, and while he includes a section that tries to rationalize Pre-emptive War within the purview of Just War theory, he remains surprisingly silent about the actual actions of the US administration. Afghanistan does not even appear anywhere between the front and rear covers of the book. Iraq receives only minor attention, and that only in the context of speaking about rebuilding of the country. There is no discussion whatsoever about the "justness" of the US invasion of that country. Charles appears to want his reader to assume that since he has painted such an evil picture of terrorists, and since he has been able to validate Pre-emptive War as "just," then the US actions are inherently "just." I would suggest, though, that he is fully aware that when these acts of aggression are tested against historic Just War theory, they simply are unable to withstand scrutiny. It is better to remain silent than prove yourself wrong. "
|
|
狗仔卡
不信基督教你就說得清楚了.信了以後反倒說不清了,因為是基督徒發動的嗎.說不定還真像布希說的有上帝的聖旨呢.
