請教: 何為"色不異空,空不異色. 色即是空,空即是色" ?

OMG. am I? I am never aware of I am possessing such an expanse of "splitting consciousness" ability.. I should go to see psychiatrist tomorrow, or perhaps we should go together.. haha

原帖由 信仰平等 於 2008-2-11 10:21 發表


You've succeeded in implanting your consciousness into my consciousness. I am lost in your labyrinth.

原帖由 信仰平等 於 2008-2-11 10:19 發表
Where am I ?

Spontaneous

原帖由 Pathless 於 2008-2-11 10:23 發表
OMG. am I? I am never aware of I am possessing such an expanse of "splitting consciousness" ability.. I should go to see psychiatrist tomorrow, or perhaps we should go together.. haha : ...

Ok! Let's visit Lacan tomorrow.

"I" is just  A response to A stimulus.

Like a homeless dog?

That's very enlightening .. I-sense is stimulated by "attachment" to the body-mind, which is always changing, and hence a stimulus in essence! impressive!

原帖由 子竹青青 於 2008-2-11 10:27 發表
"I" is just  A response to A stimulus.

原帖由 子竹青青 於 2008-2-11 10:27 發表
"I" is just  A response to A stimulus.

You mean the dog in Pavlov's stimulus/response experiment?

No~
Just a stimulus with  desirableconsequences or a stimulus with undesirable consequences.

Pathless = I don't want to specify myself into particular "tradition". It has quite similar meaning as yours - equality in all beliefs --

原帖由 信仰平等 於 2008-2-11 10:10 發表
Sorry about this confusion! I've been hallucinated by Pathless.    

I would be led to talk nonsense by Pathless the great psychiatrist who intends to lead me into a labyrinth of his own cr ...

原帖由 Pathless 於 2008-2-11 10:31 發表
That's very enlightening .. I-sense is stimulated by "attachment" to the body-mind, which is always changing, and hence a stimulus in essence! impressive!

原帖由 Pathless 於 2008-2-11 10:34 發表
Pathless = I don't want to specify myself into particular "tradition". It has quite similar meaning as yours - equality in all beliefs --

Your consciousness is implanted into my consciousness deeper and deeper.

Self-hypnosis

人和人之間的意識互動如何用色即是空,空即是色的理論解釋呢? 無路可走兄( )認為意識也是相. 這麼說就是相和相的相依了?

我對唯識一點也不明白.
不過,人的意識應該是相吧.
因為意識的形成就是個刺激-反應的過程.包括自刺激(來自體內,這是不是和遺傳有關,以及它的生物基礎我不明白)和它刺激.

你終於寫漢字了.
俺不是學外語的,平時也天天講中國話.那點學校的東西早就還給老師了.

被走投無路兄的英語催眠了半天終於清醒了.

不想被催的別人催不了哇

這大概和宗教是同一原理的說.嘎嘎~

能不能請和斑解釋解釋這個問題? 謝謝!

一個願打,一個願挨.

阿美還有也和話好象對生物特別了解，他們發言前，我胡扯幾句。

科普期刊上，人的意識就是大腦的電化過程，也即神經電流的傳導。這個其實很物質化的，這個相就是此前一刺激和當下刺激的共同結果。

原帖由 信仰平等 於 2008-2-11 10:53 發表
一個願打,一個願挨.

互相選擇，適者生存