|
|
原帖由 朽木 於 2007-9-26 10:43 發表
你所慣用的科學方法就是只聽一面之詞，是嗎？
你有沒有查過這個人？ William F. Albright。
俺提醒過你多次，如果不能全面客觀的分析一個學科的不同見解，只憑自己的喜好有選擇的引用資料，是對科學精 ...
Wiki對此人的科普介紹
Albright used this influence to advocate "biblical archaeology", in which the archaeologist's task is seen as being "to illuminate, to understand, and, in their greatest excesses, to "prove" the bible."[8]. ...
--- Albright 想通過他提出的聖經考古學證明聖經
Similarly he claimed that archaeology had proved the essential historicity of the book of Exodus, and the conquest of Canaan as described in the book of Joshua and the book of Judges.
--- Albright 認為出埃及和征服迦南是基本屬實。
Nothing today is left of this approach amongst mainstream archaeologists: "His central theses have all been overturned, partly by further advances in Biblical criticism, but mostly by the continuing archaeological research of younger Americans and Israelis to whom he himself gave encouragement and momentum...
--- Albright的這些看法已經被更多的考古發現以及進一步的聖經批判所推翻， 當今的主流考古學家已不再試圖通過考古證實出埃及和征服迦南。
The irony is that, in the long run, it will have been the newer "secular" archaeology that contributed the most to Biblical studies, not "Biblical archaeology"."[9] Nevertheless, although "biblical archaeology" is discredited in the mainstream, Albright remains a reference point for those conservative Christians (largely American) who continue to believe that archaeology can validate their faith.[10]
--- 現在的聖經研究已經以"世俗"考古學替代所謂(試圖證明聖經的)聖經考古學。雖然主流考古學家不信任Albright的(試圖證明聖經的)聖經考古學，Albright的很多觀點還是頻頻被那些認為考古可以證明聖經的保守派基督徒們使用。 |
|
狗仔卡
樓主
