倍可親

樓主: 嘁哩喀喳
列印 上一主題 下一主題

耶穌的身份分析

[複製鏈接]

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
41
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-9 17:47 | 只看該作者

回復 #40 追求永生 的帖子

早期教會史正好是我最喜歡涉足的領域。
異端不異端,由得勢掌權的那一派說了算。你從三位一體的所謂正統去好好看看保羅書信,看看他是不是異端?
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

770

主題

1萬

帖子

5221

積分

二級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
5221
42
Servant 發表於 2007-6-10 10:57 | 只看該作者

回復 #15 135 的帖子



是啊,因為神與人,本來就在不同的地位。。。才會出現神能夠「幫」我們的情形。。。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

770

主題

1萬

帖子

5221

積分

二級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
5221
43
Servant 發表於 2007-6-10 11:06 | 只看該作者

回復 #41 鄉下人進城 的帖子

鄉兄好。。。

按照你的研究,什麽不是異端?你是否信呢?

(不知道你是否明白我的意思。。。)

美國人可以站在外面,來研究中國上個世紀的歷史,說說毛主席如何如何,說說蔣委員長如何如何。。。至於對與錯,Who cares? 他們只是為了自己的飯碗。。。

同樣,現在的神學院,有許多人,都不是基督徒,只是來研究基督教的東東。。。仁兄就是碰巧遇到了這樣的老師。。。

研究中國的歷史,無論西方人多麽知識淵博,中國人的研究,還是會有獨到之處。。。
同樣,研究基督教的東東,信耶穌與不信耶穌的人,是會有不同的結論的。。。

祝福鄉兄。。。

(還是請鄉兄,回答一下有關正確的問題,以及鄉兄是否信,好嗎?謝謝。。。)
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15050
44
追求永生 發表於 2007-6-10 11:07 | 只看該作者

回復 #41 鄉下人進城 的帖子

我前一段有一貼文羅列了十七種異端,可供參考,原發海壇,博客存檔。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
45
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-10 16:23 | 只看該作者

回復 #43 Servant 的帖子

什麼是異端,取決於你從哪個角度、哪個立場去評判。從新約的角度看,公元4世紀之後鼓吹三位一體的都是異端;從天主教-新教教會的傳統教義看,所有不承認三位一體的都是異端,包括耶穌和包羅在內;從舊約的角度看,新約和基督教所宣揚的都是異端。對我來說,哪個是異端哪個不是異端,根本無所謂,倒是對你來說你必須得做出選擇。

至於研究嘛,大S兄,你覺得 Johannes Weiss、Albert Schweitzer、Martin Dibelius 和 Rudolf Bultmann 這些人算哪一路的?是信基督教的研究基督教呢,還是不信基督教的研究基督教呢?

[ 本帖最後由 鄉下人進城 於 2007-6-10 20:47 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
46
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-10 16:35 | 只看該作者
原帖由 追求永生 於 2007-6-10 11:07 發表
我前一段有一貼文羅列了十七種異端,可供參考,原發海壇,博客存檔。


不管你列了多少種異端,請你回答一個問題:

耶穌自己不信三位一體,保羅也不信,他們倆之後的(亞留斯就不說了,反正他所代表的老教會的傳統觀點被你們說成是異端)Justin(133 - ca.163)、艾倫紐斯 (ca. 130-200)、Origenes (185-254)、Tertullian (160-230)、亞歷山大城的Klemens (ca. 150-215) 也都不信你們說的三位一體。他們是不是都是異端呀?
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15050
47
追求永生 發表於 2007-6-10 17:15 | 只看該作者

回復 #46 鄉下人進城 的帖子

鄉兄,時間關係,我先給出耶穌和保羅有關三位一體的兩段經文,其他容后討論。

Matthew 28:19: "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"

2Corinthians 13:14: "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with all of you."
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
48
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-10 17:28 | 只看該作者

回復 #47 追求永生 的帖子

非常對不起,這兩段經文都沒有說這三位是一體的。更何況,馬太福音中的那句在新教神學界被認為是後人加進去的 —— 當然,福音派的可能不這麼認為。

要說新約經文,倒是有不少說耶穌和上帝不是一回事的,比如:

約翰福音14:28 你們聽見我對你們說了,我去還要到你們這裡來。你們若愛我,因我到父那裡去,就必喜樂,因為父是比我大的



馬太福音24:36 但那日子、那時辰,沒有人知道,連天上的使者也不知道,子也不知道,惟獨父知道。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15050
49
追求永生 發表於 2007-6-11 01:00 | 只看該作者

回復 #48 鄉下人進城 的帖子

這個貼和下帖重複,為節省讀者時間,特予清空處理。

[ 本帖最後由 追求永生 於 2007-6-11 02:31 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15050
50
追求永生 發表於 2007-6-11 01:09 | 只看該作者

回復 #48 鄉下人進城 的帖子

鄉兄查經很仔細。聖經上確實沒有明文的三位一體字樣。三位一體是教會的一個基本準則,到目前為止,所有基督教教會,包括天主教,新教,靈恩派在這一點上都堅定不移。不可否認,不承認的也有,但馬上被排除於基督教之外。

至於鄉兄引用的經文,那是包含在三一神的內容之中的。父和子的不同是由於他們的位格不同,因為父是管計劃的,子是管執行的。這只是分工不同。

一體則是指三位在本質上相同,子和聖靈完全按父的旨意行事,三者的目標一致,決不互相矛盾。

另外,鄉兄引用的這些經文可以看出三位的分工不同,但是不能得出結論是作者或言者反對三位一體。而我提供的經文可以清楚地看到三位格為同一個目標,所以雖然沒有三位一體的字樣,卻清楚地支持了三位一體的教義。

鄉兄若想在這個問題上深入討論,是不是可以專開一題,這個實際上是基督教的核心和認識神的總綱,是老嘁那種總是在外圍轉悠不能比的。

[ 本帖最後由 追求永生 於 2007-6-11 01:11 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
51
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-11 02:05 | 只看該作者

回復 #50 追求永生 的帖子

哪裡,哪裡,都是當年跟主教查經、跟巴特的再傳弟子學神學留的底子,慚愧了,當年也沒怎麼學好

你說得很對,三位一體確實是個教會的基本準則,只有一個例外,就是英國和美國的一神論派。但是沒辦法,從新約里不能解出三位一體說,就連祖師爺巴特也不得不承認,依靠聖經建立三位一體的教義難上加難(原話忘了,大概應該是這個意思)。

三位一體的討論我覺得在老戚的帖里就挺合適,反正是討論耶穌的身份問題。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

45

主題

2099

帖子

702

積分

貝殼網友六級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
702
52
朽木 發表於 2007-6-11 02:23 | 只看該作者
原帖由 嘁哩喀喳 於 2007-6-9 12:22 發表
〉〉被救的人說,沒有什麽啊,因為,你只是作了舉手之勞。。。。

鄙視一下servant的這種偷換概念的做法。

如果救人的人的確只是舉手之勞,那就是舉手之勞啊。但是,對於被救的人來說,救命之恩當然大得很 ...



你先別鄙視別人,你的擂台要不要拆呀?

你的第一條到現在也沒解釋呢。

第二條中你列的幾節經文我都給你解釋了,我問你有沒有看懂,你也沒回答。說你沒讀過聖經可能冤枉你,說你沒獨懂聖經不算過分吧?

你引用了「芝加哥聖經無誤宣言」,這篇宣言也貼出來了,你繼續提出你的論據啊。

還有下面三條,我都一一反駁過,你怎麼不回答了?怎麼跑到這裡換另一個話題了?
可雕,看在誰手裡。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

2308

主題

5萬

帖子

1萬

積分

版主

求真理不倦悔

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
15050
53
追求永生 發表於 2007-6-11 02:26 | 只看該作者

回復 #51 鄉下人進城 的帖子 只有一個例外,就是英國和美國的一神論派。

這裡討論也好,正好給老嘁來點兒神學啟蒙。

至於鄉兄提到一神論派,我不知詳情,如果他們強調的是神的本質屬性,三位一體中的體,那就和基督教的教義沒衝突,當然前提是不能否定耶穌和聖靈是有位格的神。否則就是有定論的異端,而不是基督教。

三位一體本身就是一個非常奧秘的教義,否則就不會有教會史兩千年的反覆討論至今不衰了。我雖然比鄉兄接觸這個教義要晚的多,誠屬後進,但是已經深刻地認識到,這是解經認識神的關鍵,這點上弄不清楚,別的方面花再大力氣也是枉然。

[ 本帖最後由 追求永生 於 2007-6-11 02:27 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

45

主題

2099

帖子

702

積分

貝殼網友六級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
702
54
朽木 發表於 2007-6-11 02:27 | 只看該作者
原帖由 鄉下人進城 於 2007-6-11 02:05 發表
哪裡,哪裡,都是當年跟主教查經、跟巴特的再傳弟子學神學留的底子,慚愧了,當年也沒怎麼學好

你說得很對,三位一體確實是個教會的基本準則,只有一個例外,就是英國和美國的一神論派。但是沒辦法,從新 ...


你說的是新正統神學之父卡爾-巴特嗎? 看來你真沒學好,你所引用的文章絕大部分都不是巴特神學的,而是巴特所極力反對的自由神學。
可雕,看在誰手裡。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

45

主題

2099

帖子

702

積分

貝殼網友六級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
702
55
朽木 發表於 2007-6-11 02:42 | 只看該作者
原帖由 鄉下人進城 於 2007-6-10 16:35 發表


不管你列了多少種異端,請你回答一個問題:

耶穌自己不信三位一體,保羅也不信,他們倆之後的(亞留斯就不說了,反正他所代表的老教會的傳統觀點被你們說成是異端)Justin(133 - ca.163)、艾倫紐斯 (ca. ...


非也!

在他們的著作中可以看出,早期教父從一開始就注意到神三而一,一而三的屬性,只是不清楚這種關係怎麼表達,但也沒有太多的關注。直到作長老的亞流在一次講演中流露出對基督屬性的貶低,才引起主教亞力山大的注意,在北非大會上,亞流的觀點被指責,後者不服,才引發後來的著名的尼西亞大會,從那以後人們才特別關注這件事,三位一體這個詞和教義是從那以後才發展起來的,這已經到第四世記了。第一,二世紀的教父們當然不知道這個詞和這個教義。
可雕,看在誰手裡。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
56
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-11 02:52 | 只看該作者

回復 #55 朽木 的帖子

拉倒吧你,回去好好讀一下那些老教父們的著作里關於耶穌和他的父的關係的論述再出來瞎掰乎也不晚。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

45

主題

2099

帖子

702

積分

貝殼網友六級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
702
57
朽木 發表於 2007-6-11 03:56 | 只看該作者
原帖由 鄉下人進城 於 2007-6-11 02:52 發表
拉倒吧你,回去好好讀一下那些老教父們的著作里關於耶穌和他的父的關係的論述再出來瞎掰乎也不晚。



隨便給你列出一些1-3世紀教父們的著作摘抄,自己看吧。記住,三位一體成為爭論的焦點是在第4世紀。這些都是初代和早期教父們在這以前寫的,所以,三位一體根本不是後來加上去的,從使徒教父(使徒的第一代傳人)就有。只不過是後來在辯論中,因為這一教義成為問題的焦點,才特別突出的強調出來的。


The Didache
"After the foregoing instructions, baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living [running] water…. If you have neither, pour water three times on the head, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." (Didache 7:1 [A.D. 70]).[24]

Ignatius of Antioch
"[T]o the Church at Ephesus in Asia ...chosen through true suffering by the will of the Father in Jesus Christ our God." (Epistle to the Ephesians, 0:0 [c. A.D. 110]).[24]

"There is one only physician, of flesh and of spirit, generate and ingenerate, God in man, true Life in death, Son of Mary and Son of God, first passible and then impassible, Jesus Christ our Lord." (ibid., 7:2).[25]

"For our God, Jesus Christ, was conceived by Mary in accord with God's plan: of the seed of David, it is true, but also of the Holy Spirit." (ibid., 18:2).[24]

"Nevertheless, I have heard of some who have passed on from this to you, having false doctrine, whom ye did not suffer to sow among you, but stopped your ears, that ye might not receive those things which were sown by them, as being stones of the temple of the Father, prepared for the building of God the Father, and drawn up on high by the instrument of Jesus Christ, which is the cross, making use of the Holy Spirit as a rope, while your faith was the means by which you ascended, and your love the way which led up to God." (ibid., 9:1).[26]

"Study, therefore, to be established in the doctrines of the Lord and the apostles, that so all things, whatsoever ye do, may prosper both in the flesh and spirit; in faith and love; in the Son, and in the Father, and in the Spirit; in the beginning and in the end; with your most admirable bishop, and the well-compacted spiritual crown of your presbytery, and the deacons who are according to God. Be ye subject to the bishop, and to one another, as Jesus Christ to the Father, according to the flesh, and the apostles to Christ, and to the Father, and to the Spirit; that so there may be a union both fleshly and spiritual." (Epistle to the Magnesians, Chapter 13 [SR]).[27]

Justin Martyr
"We will prove that we worship him reasonably; for we have learned that he is the Son of the true God himself, that he holds a second place, and the Spirit of prophecy a third. For this they accuse us of madness, saying that we attribute to a crucified man a place second to the unchangeable and eternal God, the Creator of all things; but they are ignorant of the mystery which lies therein." (First Apology 13:5–6 [A.D. 151]).[24]

Theophilus of Antioch
"It is the attribute of God, of the most high and almighty and of the living God, not only to be everywhere, but also to see and hear all; for he can in no way be contained in a place.... The three days before the luminaries were created are types of the Trinity: God, his Word, and his Wisdom." (To Autolycus 2:15 [A.D. 181]).[24]

Irenaeus
"For the Church, although dispersed throughout the whole world even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and from their disciples the faith in one God, the Father Almighty ...and in one Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became flesh for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit." (Against Heresies 1:10:1 [A.D. 189]).[24]

Tertullian
"We do indeed believe that there is only one God, but we believe that under this dispensation, or, as we say, oikonomia, there is also a Son of this one only God, his Word, who proceeded from him and through whom all things were made and without whom nothing was made…. We believe he was sent down by the Father, in accord with his own promise, the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, the sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father and the Son, and in the Holy Spirit…. This rule of faith has been present since the beginning of the gospel, before even the earlier heretics." (Against Praxeas 2 [A.D. 216]).[24]

"And at the same time the mystery of the oikonomia is safeguarded, for the unity is distributed in a Trinity. Placed in order, the three are the Father, Son, and Spirit. They are three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in being, but in form; not in power, but in kind; of one being, however, and one condition and one power, because he is one God of whom degrees and forms and kinds are taken into account in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." (ibid).[24]

"Keep always in mind the rule of faith which I profess and by which I bear witness that the Father and the Son and the Spirit are inseparable from each other, and then you will understand what is meant by it. Observe now that I say the Father is other [distinct], the Son is other, and the Spirit is other. This statement is wrongly understood by every uneducated or perversely disposed individual, as if it meant diversity and implied by that diversity a separation of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit." (ibid., 9).[24]
"Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent persons, who are yet distinct one from another. These three are, one essence, not one person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are one' [John 10:30], in respect of unity of being not singularity of number." (ibid., 25).[24]

Origen
"For we do not hold that which the heretics imagine: that some part of the being of God was converted into the Son, or that the Son was procreated by the Father from non-existent substances, that is, from a being outside himself, so that there was a time when he [the Son] did not exist." (The Fundamental Doctrines 4:4:1 [A.D. 225]).[24]
"No, rejecting every suggestion of corporeality, we hold that the Word and the Wisdom was begotten out of the invisible and incorporeal God, without anything corporal being acted upon…the expression which we employ, however that there was never a time when he did not exist is to be taken with a certain allowance. For these very words 'when' and 'never' are terms of temporal significance, while whatever is said of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, is to be understood as transcending all time, all ages." (ibid.).[24]

"For it is the Trinity alone which exceeds every sense in which not only temporal but even eternal may be understood. It is all other things, indeed, which are outside the Trinity, which are to be measured by time and ages." (ibid.).[24]

Hippolytus
"The Word alone of this God is from God himself, wherefore also the Word is God, being the being of God. Now the world was made from nothing, wherefore it is not God." (Refutation of All Heresies 10:29 [A.D. 228]).[24]

Novatian
"For Scripture as much announces Christ as also God, as it announces God himself as man. It has as much described Jesus Christ to be man, as moreover it has also described Christ the Lord to be God. Because it does not set forth him to be the Son of God only, but also the son of man; nor does it only say, the son of man, but it has also been accustomed to speak of him as the Son of God. So that being of both, he is both, lest if he should be one only, he could not be the other. For as nature itself has prescribed that he must be believed to be a man who is of man, so the same nature prescribes also that he must be believed to be God who is of God…. Let them, therefore, who read that Jesus Christ the son of man is man, read also that this same Jesus is called also God and the Son of God." (Treatise on the Trinity 11 [A.D. 235]).[24]

Pope Dionysius
"Next, then, I may properly turn to those who divide and cut apart and destroy the most sacred proclamation of the Church of God, making of it [the Trinity], as it were, three powers, distinct substances, and three godheads.... [Some heretics] proclaim that there are in some way three gods, when they divide the sacred unity into three substances foreign to each other and completely separate." (Letter to Dionysius of Alexandria 1 [A.D. 262]).[24]
"Therefore, the divine Trinity must be gathered up and brought together in one, a summit, as it were, I mean the omnipotent God of the universe.... It is blasphemy, then, and not a common one but the worst, to say that the Son is in any way a handiwork [creature].... But if the Son came into being [was created], there was a time when these attributes did not exist; and, consequently, there was a time when God was without them, which is utterly absurd." (ibid., 1–2).[24]

"Neither, then, may we divide into three godheads the wonderful and divine unity.... Rather, we must believe in God, the Father Almighty; and in Christ Jesus, his Son; and in the Holy Spirit; and that the Word is united to the God of the universe. 'For,' he says, 'The Father and I are one,' and 'I am in the Father, and the Father in me'." (ibid., 3).[24]

Gregory the Wonderworker
"There is one God.... There is a perfect Trinity, in glory and eternity and sovereignty, neither divided nor estranged. Wherefore there is nothing either created or in servitude in the Trinity; nor anything super-induced, as if at some former period it was non-existent, and at some later period it was introduced. And thus neither was the Son ever wanting to the Father, nor the Spirit to the Son; but without variation and without change, the same Trinity abides ever." (Declaration of Faith [A.D. 265]).[24]
可雕,看在誰手裡。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

267

主題

91

帖子

4萬

積分

禁止發言

夜貓子

積分
45907
58
鄉下人進城 發表於 2007-6-11 04:06 | 只看該作者

回復 #57 朽木 的帖子

嗬嗬,來英文?可惜,英文我不懂。給你來點德文的怎麼樣?
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

34

主題

1283

帖子

293

積分

貝殼網友二級

Rank: 3Rank: 3

積分
293
59
從不迷路 發表於 2007-6-11 04:10 | 只看該作者

回復 #57 朽木 的帖子

整這麼些有啥意思?聖經里說了三位一體了嗎?如果沒有,甭管誰解經解出三位一體都是沒有根據的,這生生造出來的「三位一體」這詞兒,才真正是異端邪說呢!
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

13

主題

412

帖子

93

積分

貝殼新手上路

Rank: 2

積分
93
60
135 發表於 2007-6-11 04:16 | 只看該作者
謝謝鄉下人進城 和 朽木 兩位的討論﹐ 這種討論長知識。希望能深入下去。
AS IT IS
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-8-10 01:32

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表