按優先秩序安排世界

安排世界，我先看哪裡適合人的居住, 再看環境是否優美，看個人喜好，看工作選擇  Arranging the world, I will first look at where people are suitable for living, then see if the environment is beautiful, see personal preferences, and see job choices.
我們這些搞理工的，看世界眼光不一樣，我們是先看結構的，抽象的，人性的，公共功能部分. 那些政治, 文化, 宗教都是表面的東西。比如我們提供電話服務，一視同仁，如果你有特別的需要，再給你添加服務，多收些費就行。比如美國花那麼多錢，在世界各地建那麼多的軍事基地，你不會花些錢跟你想象的敵方搞好關係? 本來就沒有那麼多的對抗！在軍事基地所在國幫他們建設，為他們培養人才，這樣世界上不就少很多衝突? 你的錢用對地方文明就向前發展！你迷信那些文明衝突理論，一定要把拉美收入西方系統, 結果你看美國經濟現在被低素質移民拖下水. 人的心理是希望生活在文化豐富的環境中，誰願意象Jackie那樣，每天啃麥當勞漢堡包啊？我小時候在上海，即使是那麼窮，每天早上桌上的小菜也有好幾碟. 來美國以後, 基本上一頓只吃一樣東西。文明不一定是衝突的，看你怎麼樣管理了. 如果我來安排世界，我先看哪裡適合人的居住，覺得應該是沿著赤道兩邊亞熱帶溫帶氣候宜人的地方比較好. 再看平原山區交通是否便捷，如果以後運輸方便，大糧倉生產的糧食可以運到四面八方，都不一定非要在穀物豐盛的地方住. 再看環境是否優美，看個人喜好，看工作選擇。文明平衡是目標， 所以對居住條件，應該要有相似的標準。覺得在其他條件都相似的情況下，人口多的地方，就是繁榮富裕，文化豐富的地方啊，就是市場，就是經濟的動力源. 用不著去搞那些國家之間的勾心鬥角和萬無一失的多重防備。覺得城市應該是一連串一帶散布的，每一城市都應該有其特色，產業鏈最好在一起。不同文明是可以重疊共生的.

We who are engaged in science and technology, look at the world in different way, we look at the structure, abstract, humanity, and public functions. Those politics, culture, and religion are superficial things. For example, we provide telephone service, same for every customer. If you have special needs, then just add services to you with more charge. For example, if the United States spends so much money and builds so many military bases around the world, why not you spend some money to make a good relationship with the enemy imagined. There is not so much confrontation! Help them build in the country where the military base is located, and train talents for them, so that are there not many conflicts in the world? Your money will move forward with local civilization! If you are superstitious about the theory of clash of civilizations, and you must take Latin America into the Western system. As a result, you can see that the US economy is now dragged down by low-quality immigrants. People's psychology is to live in a culturally rich environment. Who wants to be like Jackie only eating Hamburger as meals? When I was a child in Shanghai. Even if we were so poor, there were still several dishes on the table every morning. After coming to the United States, basically I only eat one dish for meal. Civilizations are not necessarily to conflict with each other. It depends how you manage it. If I come to arrange the world, I will first look at where are suitable for people living. I think it should be better to go along the temperate subtropical temperate climate. Look at the plain, mountain and transportation system. Whether it is convenient or not, if the transportation is convenient in the future, the grain produced by the large granary can be transported in all directions, and it is not necessary to live in a place rich in crops. Look at whether the environment is beautiful, look at personal preferences, and look at work choices. The balance of civilization is the goal, so there should be similar standards for living conditions. I feel that when other conditions are similar, the place with a large population is a place that is prosperous and rich, and rich in culture. It has the market, which is the source of economic power. It is not necessary to engage in intrigue and foolproof multiple defenses between those countries. I feel that the city should like a series scattered, every city should have its own characteristics, the industry chain is best together. Different civilizations can overlap and symbiosis.