全球化的目標是文明再平衡。

May 23, 2016 at 6:59 PM
*全球化設計目標應該是縮小人民生活水準上的差別為主，用儘可能平等的標準來教育孩子  The goal of Globalization design should be to narrow the differences in people』s living standards and educate children with the same standards as possible.


你們好嗎？今天早上看新聞, 上海的中環居然因為過載而斷裂，是不是台灣人想做超過能力的事兒？ 想來你們可能在談判吧？以你們那麼大的智慧，只要把事情準備充分呢，給他們看一張大的圖，然後指給他們看他們要的部分, 是大圖中的哪一個小部分，問他們，是自己單獨孤芳自賞呢？還是和世界融成一體, 資源互享，有更廣闊的空間, 更多的燦爛可能？不願意也沒關係，給他們留有空間, 先替他們設計著，有一天他們開竅了, 想加入了, 告訴他們可能要付更大的代價！因為別人早入伙了，系統都建起來了，他們只能成客戶了，沒法分紅利呀！是不是？ 很多來跟你討價還價的，都是橫向擴展，很少能站在頂層腑視, 統籌, 兼顧的，這就註定他們不可能做整體的優化，而只是部分的！那一定會傷及其他人的利益！我不知道你們這兒的決策，是憑誰強誰做主嗎，還是誰人多，或誰土地大來做主. 我想, 目標應該是先縮小人民生活水準上的差別為主吧，民生為先，同時, 用儘可能平等的標準來教育孩子，不計種族, 地域, 文化，為孩子提供廣闊的發展天地，這樣就會得到大多數人的擁護和支持. 我們這一輩人人生有限，但孩子將來無限！是不是？

how are you guys? Looking at the news this morning, Shanghai』s Central freeway circle was actually broken due to overload Taiwanese truck. Was it because Taiwanese want to do more than their ability? I think you may negotiate with them, right? With your wisdom, just prepare things well, show them a big picture. Then show them what they want  which is actually part of the big picture. Ask them, want to be alone, lonely self-reward? Or still integrated with the world, resources are shared, there is a broader space, more brilliant possibilities? It doesn't matter if they don't want to integrate, give them space, first design space for them. If one day they open up, want to join, tell them that they may have to pay a higher price! Because others have been acquainted, the system has been built, they can only become customers, can not share bonuses! is not it? Many of the bargains that come with you are horizontal expansion. Few contempt is for top-level contempt, co-ordination, and consideration. This is doomed to make them impossible to optimize overall, but only partially! That will definitely hurt the interests of others! I don't know, if your decision here is based on who is stronger and who is the master, or who has more population, or who has larger land to be the master. I think the goal should be to narrow the difference in people's living standards first, people's livelihood first, at the same time, educate children with the same standards as possible, regardless of race, geography, culture, and provide children with a broad development horizon, which will be agreed and supported by most people. Our generation has limited life, but the future of the child is unlimited! Is not it?