美國模式缺少人與人之間交流共振。

Jan 13, 2017 at 6:51 PM
美國的模式沒有過多地考慮人集中互相交流時所產生的人與人之間的共振，所產生出巨大能力和價值  The American model does not consider too much the resonance between people when they concentrate on communicating with each other, resulting in huge capabilities and value
親愛的主席，88，今天講嚴肅話題.  大家都說美國制度好，可是，有沒有人想過，他們設計制度的時候是以一定數學模型為基礎的. 舉個例子，學校校車去接孩子, 轉一圈回到學校要一個小時. 當周圍的孩子人數不是太多而時間又允許的時候這樣做是可以的. 可是人一多的話，這樣子的操作可能就行不通. 在數學上模式上，服務是有流量和服務速度的. 美國整個系統，都是按照不同服務所需要的時間和速度，來配備流量的，而且流量都是不大的. 這樣子的模型搬到象亞洲人口眾多的國家，那是根本行不通的. 就像上次買電影票那樣, 如果按照美國的制度按部就班地排隊，當亞洲國家人口眾多，那不知道要哪年哪月客戶才能等到服務了. 所以不同的國家國情不同，所實施的「治」的方法，也應該不同的. 應該有不同的模型，對條件相似的國家可以應用這些適合的模型. 比如在印度, 孟加拉國的火車，不但車廂里人滿為患，甚至在火車車頂都可以坐滿人. 按照西方的標準，這絕對不安全，坐在車廂里都要一人一票沒有站票的. 如按這樣子的法則，到印度孟加拉國，那些人哪年哪月才能坐上火車呀？ 這裡就會出現有兩個矛盾，一是，美國的頂層決策者，當他們把美國的民主制度輸送到國外的時候，他們不了解其他國家的國情，他們自己或也不知道自己的模型其應用的條件和環境，這當然是行不通的.  還有，他們控制其他國家的移民進入美國，表面上看是控制服務的流量，可同時卻開放大量拉丁裔進入美國. 美國的模式只考慮服務和能量消耗，服務是要有代價的，要有人買單的，美國富裕，決策階層以為這些享受服務的人，自然而然就會有對服務的償付能力，美國的模式因為把人分離開，這樣易於模式的運作，並沒有過多地考慮人集中互相交流時所產生的人與人之間的共振，所產生出巨大能力和價值. 當然把人當物處理，最完美的條件，sunny day situation， 就是把人隔離開。當把高素質的人會聚在一起，產生的能量價值是幾何級數的. 美國這邊決策者不知道這個，或者罔顧，或不懂人性，而是從意識形態和宗教文化為背景出發，或者地域政治出發，不願接納亞洲來的眾多的高素質的移民，卻讓許多低素質的拉丁裔湧入美國。 低素質的拉丁裔再跟美國的離散模式相結合，那經濟才會走下坡. 奧巴馬政府八年，把以前的債務翻了一番，為了增加稅收拋出來一個全民健保. 這不是解決問題的根本之道. 價值是創造的，創造是要頭腦的. 當有一天整個社會創造的財富，不能夠支持這個模式的時候，這個制度就要崩潰了！

Dear President, 88, I am talking about serious topics today. Everyone says that the American system is good, but has anyone thought that when they design the system, they are based on a certain mathematical model. For example, the school bus picks up children It takes one hour to go back to school in a circle. It is possible to do this when the number of children around is not too large and time permits. However, if there are more people, this operation may not work. In mathematical mode The service has traffic and service speed. The entire system in the United States is equipped with traffic according to the time and speed required for different services, and the traffic is not large. This model is moved to a population like Asia. Country, that simply won』t work. Just like when you bought a movie ticket last time, if you line up step by step according to the US system, when Asian countries have a large population, you don』t know what year and month customers will wait for service. So different Different countries have different national conditions, and the methods of "governance" implemented should also be different. There should be different models, which can be applied to countries with similar conditions For example, trains in India and Bangladesh are not only overcrowded, they can even be filled on the roof of the train. According to Western standards, this is definitely not safe, and there is no need to stand in the carriage for one person, one ticket. Tickets. If you follow these rules, when you go to India and Bangladesh, which years and months can those people get on the train? There will be two contradictions here. One is that the top policymakers in the United States do not understand the national conditions of other countries when they send American democracy abroad. They do not know their own models or their applications. The conditions and environment, of course, will not work. Also, they control the immigration of other countries into the United States. On the surface, they control the flow of services, but at the same time they open a large number of Latinos into the United States. The US model only considers services and Energy consumption and service have a price. Someone has to pay for it. The wealthy Americans and decision-makers think that those who enjoy the service will naturally have the ability to pay for the service. The American model is easy to model because it separates people The operation did not consider too much the resonance between people when they concentrated on each other, which produced great ability and value. Of course, treating people as things, the perfect condition, the sunny day situation, is to put People isolated. When high-quality people are brought together, the energy value generated is geometric progression. Policymakers in the United States do not know this, or ignore, or do not understand human nature, but start from the background of ideology and religious culture, or Regional politics, the unwillingness to accept the many high-quality immigrants from Asia, but many low-quality Latinos poured into the United States. If the low-quality Latinos are combined with the US discrete model, then the economy will decline. The Obama administration has doubled its previous debt for eight years and throws out universal health insurance in order to increase taxes. This is not a solution. The fundamental way. Value is created, and creation requires mind. When the wealth created by the whole society cannot support this model, the system will collapse!