倍可親

回復: 5
列印 上一主題 下一主題

【 新聞周刊】美國人究竟有多蠢 - 民眾基礎知識測驗結果令人失望

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

2萬

帖子

2萬

積分

八級貝殼核心

倍可親決策會員(十九級)

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
22461
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
laodai 發表於 2011-3-23 12:40 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
本文轉自《四月青年》       2011-3-22  

【原文標題】How Dumb Are We?
【登載媒體】新聞周刊
【原文作者】Andrew Romano
【原文鏈接】http://www.newsweek.com/2011/03/20/how-dumb-are-we.html

  新聞周刊對1000名美國人做「美國民眾測驗」——38%的人沒有通過這項測驗。我們的無知讓這個國家的未來陷入了危機。



  這是一個會讓高中歷史老師以頭戕地的分數。新聞周刊最近讓1000名美國公民進行美國官方的公民知識測試,有29%的人不知道副總統是誰;37%的人不知道我們冷戰的對象是誰;44%的人不知道權力和自由法案說的是什麼;還有6%的人甚至不知道獨立日是哪一天。

  別誤會,民眾的無知早已不是什麼新聞。自從建國以來,美國人就搞不清除權力制衡的含義,認不準自己的參議員。自從在Harry Truman時代(順便說一句,他也是一位總統)調查人員開始公布這些令人氣餒的調查結果,美國人就一直對同胞們的庸俗痛心不已。根據安妮博格通訊學院Michael X. Delli Carpini的研究,自從二次世界大戰以來,民眾知識的變化幅度平均每年「不超過1%」。

  但是世界在變化,很不幸,世界變得越來越不適合像我們這樣既無知又對周圍漠不關心的人。

  要清楚地認識到我們面對的風險,重要的是先要了解美國人到底無知在哪裡。2009年3月,歐洲通訊雜誌讓英國人、丹麥人、芬蘭人和美國人來回答一些有關國際事務的問題。歐洲人徹底擊敗了我們。例如,68%的丹麥人、75%的英國人和76%的芬蘭人知道塔利班是做什麼的,但只有58%的美國人能回答這個問題,難道不是我們在主導對阿富汗的行動嗎?最新一系列的民眾調查顯示出,我們拖了發達世界國家的後腿。

  大部分專家認為,美國相對複雜的政治體系讓美國人難以了解。耶魯政治學家、《勝者為王》的作者之一Jacob Hacker說,在很多歐洲國家,議會採取比例代表制,上台的多數黨不需要「與眾多的地方政府分享權力」。與此相比,我們被迫採取非比例的議會制、亂糟糟的國家、地方和聯邦官僚機構,以及永遠要選舉出所有你能想到的行政機構(法院、縣警察局、學校董事會成員等等)。《好市民》的作者Michael Schudson說:「沒人能把這些問題理順,每次投票時你都會想到這些問題。你知道自己根本無法搞清楚這一切,所以就不再繼續了解下去。

  如此複雜的政治體系也無法解決美國在發達國家中收入分配最不平均的現狀,金字塔頂端的400個家庭攫取的金錢比底端60%的人群收入還要高。就像紐約大學社會學家Dalton Conley所說:「這就像把蘋果和橘子做比較。我們和丹麥不一樣,我們有大批的貧困人群,無法接受良好的教育。還有大量的移民人口,他們幾乎不會說英語。」如果調查僅針對富裕人群和本土人群,美國的成績應該會好於歐洲。

  其它一些因素讓情況更加惡化。Hacker認為,很重要的一點是美國由各州獨立運作的分散的教育體系。「如果集中設置統一的課程,公眾就會具備更多的常規知識,也會形成更強大的公民文化。」另外一點是我們過分依賴市場驅動的課程內容,而不是公共普及性的知識內容。根據歐洲通訊雜誌的研究,這會「讓人們更加關注公共事務和國際新聞,從而在這些領域積累更多的知識。」



  兩個世紀以來,美國人都沒有因對周圍世界缺乏了解而受到懲罰。但時代變化了,變化的方向是,無知已經成為前進的巨大障礙。在封閉的社會中當然可以採取閉關自守的政策,但我們不能只看著自己眼前的事物。中國和印度(以及日本核電廠)發生的事情影響到底特律汽車製造商的工作;議會和白宮中發生的事情影響到與中國和印度的競爭。網際網路面世之前,我們只要塊頭大就足夠了,現在的信息經濟需要的是頭腦。我們從前依賴政治制度(比如有組織的工會)來控制中產階級,並對他們產生影響,現在這一切都不存在了。Hacker說:「問題不是人們以前知道的多,現在知道的少,而是人們的無知被更加愚蠢的政治機構給掩蓋了。」結果是,在我們生活的社會中,興奮的積極分子在社會階層的兩個極端來主導國家的走向——往往在錯誤的時機把政客們引向歧途。

  目前對政府財政支出的不同意見揭示了民眾無知的新危害。任何一個經濟學家都知道如何處理美國的債務:對高額投資項目進行成本控制改革;削減膨脹的國防預算;以及(如果增長依舊緩慢)改革稅制以填充我們空空如也的金庫。但是一個又一個的民意測驗顯示出,投票人根本不了解我們的預算狀況是什麼樣子的。2010年的世界民意測驗顯示,美國人希望解決財政赤字的方法是削減對外援助,從他們認為的水平(總預算金額的27%)削減到更合理的13%。而實際數字只有1%。根據蓋洛普提供的數據,1月25日的CNN調查發現,儘管71%的民眾希望政府的規模更小,但大部分人都反對削減老年醫保(81%)、社會保險(78%)和醫療補助(70%)。他們更希望採取遏制浪費的手段——這一類支出在他們的頭腦中,似乎佔據了財政支出的50%。

  無庸贅言,聽這些人的話根本不可能讓預算更加合理。但是政客們卻不管不顧地在討好民眾,甚至還鼓勵實施這些錯誤的建議。因此,我們現在就在削減短期支出問題上爭來爭去,這讓我們損失了70萬就業崗位,讓我們本來狼狽不堪的復興之路雪上加霜,讓我們的國際競爭力遭受損害。而對那些威脅我們國際競爭力的長期財政挑戰置之不理。

  從歷史角度來看,期望短時間內發生一些變化並不現實,但並不是說變化不好。斯坦福大學通訊教授James Fishkin多年來在從事理性民主的試驗。前提很簡單:讓民眾投票決定重大問題,不公布投票結果,在讓他們見證事實之後觀察他們觀點的變化。Fishkin的發現是,人們從截然不同的角度進行投票——比如決定政府財政支出——當他們深入了解預算的具體情況之後,他們的想法更趨於理性。Hacker說:「民眾的問題是無知,而不是愚蠢。問題是缺少信息造成的,而不是缺少能力造成的。」這種現象是可被治癒的,還是純粹的不治之症還有待觀察,但是我們現在就應當開始尋找治療方案了。
明有物有則,索源清流潔。

1萬

主題

2萬

帖子

2萬

積分

八級貝殼核心

倍可親決策會員(十九級)

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
22461
沙發
 樓主| laodai 發表於 2011-3-23 12:42 | 只看該作者
附:美國民眾測驗包含了100個問題,分五大類:美國政府、政治體制、權力和責任、美國歷史、美國公民。參與測驗的公民隨機抽取10道題目,至少回答正確6道題目才算合格。在參與測驗的1000人中,Daily Beast輪換抽取題目。總體來看,62%的美國人及格,38%不及格。美國人對美國公民方面知識差異巨大。以下一些題目顯示出哪些人回答正確,哪些人回答錯誤。

《獨立宣言》在何時發布?
答案:1776年7月4日
正確:67%
錯誤:33%

制憲會議上發生了什麼事情?
答案:制定憲法,或者開國元勛編寫了憲法
正確:35%
錯誤:65%

《聯邦黨人文集》對通過美國憲法起到了促進的作用,列出《聯邦黨人文集》的作者之一。
答案:James Madison、Alexander Hamilton、John Jay、Publius.
正確:12%
錯誤:88%

第一次世界大戰期間誰是美國總統?
答案:Woodrow Wilson.
正確:20%
錯誤:80%

美國在第二次世界大戰期間的敵人是誰?
答案:日本、德國、義大利
正確:60%
錯誤:40%

冷戰期間,美國最煩惱的是什麼問題?
答案:共產主義
正確:27%
錯誤:73%

Susan B. Anthony做了什麼事情?
答案:為女性的權力抗爭,或者為民眾的權力抗爭
正確:41%
錯誤:59%

馬丁路德金做了什麼事情?
答案:為民眾權力抗爭,或者致力於所有美國人的平等工作
正確:77%
錯誤:23%

誰掌管政府的行政部門?
答案:總統
正確:73%
錯誤:27%

我們選舉出的參議員任職多長時間?
答案:6年
正確:39%
錯誤:61%

眾議院有多少個投票席位?
答案:435
正確:14%
錯誤:86%

如果總統和副總統都無法繼續任職,誰將代任總統?
答案:白宮發言人
正確:58%
錯誤:42%

根據我們的憲法,一些權力屬於聯邦政府。列舉出一項聯邦政府的權力。
答案:印鈔、宣戰、建立軍隊、締約
正確:19%  
錯誤:81%

最高法院中有幾名大法官?
答案:9
正確:37%
錯誤:63%

我們管憲法的前10條修正案叫什麼?
答案:權力和自由法案
正確:57%
錯誤:43%

國家至高無上的法律是什麼?
答案:憲法
正確:30%
錯誤:70%

憲法共有多少條修正案?
答案:27
正確:6%
錯誤:94%

現任美國副總統是誰?
答案:Joe Biden.
正確:71%  
錯誤:29%

現任白宮發言人是誰?
答案:John Boehner.
正確:41%
錯誤:59%

美國的經濟體制是什麼?
答案:資本主義經濟或者市場經濟
正確:33%
錯誤:67%



原文:

NEWSWEEK gave 1,000 Americans the U.S. Citizenship Test--38 percent failed. The country's future is imperiled by our ignorance.

They』re the sort of scores that drive high-school history teachers to drink. When NEWSWEEK recently asked 1,000 U.S. citizens to take America』s official citizenship test, 29 percent couldn』t name the vice president. Seventy-three percent couldn』t correctly say why we fought the Cold War. Forty-four percent were unable to define the Bill of Rights. And 6 percent couldn』t even circle Independence Day on a calendar.

Don』t get us wrong: civic ignorance is nothing new. For as long as they』ve existed, Americans have been misunderstanding checks and balances and misidentifying their senators. And they』ve been lamenting the philistinism of their peers ever since pollsters started publishing these dispiriting surveys back in Harry Truman』s day. (He was a president, by the way.) According to a study by Michael X. Delli Carpini, dean of the Annenberg School for Communication, the yearly shifts in civic knowledge since World War II have averaged out to 「slightly under 1 percent.」

But the world has changed. And unfortunately, it』s becoming more and more inhospitable to incurious know-nothings—like us.

To appreciate the risks involved, it』s important to understand where American ignorance comes from. In March 2009, the European Journal of Communication asked citizens of Britain, Denmark, Finland, and the U.S. to answer questions on international affairs. The Europeans clobbered us. Sixty-eight percent of Danes, 75 percent of Brits, and 76 percent of Finns could, for example, identify the Taliban, but only 58 percent of Americans managed to do the same—even though we』ve led the charge in Afghanistan. It was only the latest in a series of polls that have shown us lagging behind our First World peers.

Most experts agree that the relative complexity of the U.S. political system makes it hard for Americans to keep up. In many European countries, parliaments have proportional representation, and the majority party rules without having to 「share power with a lot of subnational governments,」 notes Yale political scientist Jacob Hacker, coauthor of Winner-Take-All Politics. In contrast, we』re saddled with a nonproportional Senate; a tangle of state, local, and federal bureaucracies; and near-constant elections for every imaginable office (judge, sheriff, school-board member, and so on). 「Nobody is competent to understand it all, which you realize every time you vote,」 says Michael Schudson, author of The Good Citizen. 「You know you』re going to come up short, and that discourages you from learning more.」

It doesn』t help that the United States has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the developed world, with the top 400 households raking in more money than the bottom 60 percent combined. As Dalton Conley, an NYU sociologist, explains, 「it』s like comparing apples and oranges. Unlike Denmark, we have a lot of very poor people without access to good education, and a huge immigrant population that doesn』t even speak English.」 When surveys focus on well-off, native-born respondents, the U.S. actually holds its own against Europe.

Other factors exacerbate the situation. A big one, Hacker argues, is the decentralized U.S. education system, which is run mostly by individual states: 「When you have more centrally managed curricula, you have more common knowledge and a stronger civic culture.」 Another hitch is our reliance on market-driven programming rather than public broadcasting, which, according to the EJC study, 「devotes more attention to public affairs and international news, and fosters greater knowledge in these areas.」

For more than two centuries, Americans have gotten away with not knowing much about the world around them. But times have changed—and they』ve changed in ways that make civic ignorance a big problem going forward. While isolationism is fine in an isolated society, we can no longer afford to mind our own business. What happens in China and India (or at a Japanese nuclear plant) affects the autoworker in Detroit; what happens in the statehouse and the White House affects the competition in China and India. Before the Internet, brawn was enough; now the information economy demands brains instead. And where we once relied on political institutions (like organized labor) to school the middle classes and give them leverage, we now have nothing. 「The issue isn』t that people in the past knew a lot more and know less now,」 says Hacker. 「It』s that their ignorance was counterbalanced by denser political organizations.」 The result is a society in which wired activists at either end of the spectrum dominate the debate—and lead politicians astray at precisely the wrong moment.

The current conflict over government spending illustrates the new dangers of ignorance. Every economist knows how to deal with the debt: cost-saving reforms to big-ticket entitlement programs; cuts to our bloated defense budget; and (if growth remains slow) tax reforms designed to refill our depleted revenue coffers. But poll after poll shows that voters have no clue what the budget actually looks like. A 2010 World Public Opinion survey found that Americans want to tackle deficits by cutting foreign aid from what they believe is the current level (27 percent of the budget) to a more prudent 13 percent. The real number is under 1 percent. A Jan. 25 CNN poll, meanwhile, discovered that even though 71 percent of voters want smaller government, vast majorities oppose cuts to Medicare (81 percent), Social Security (78 percent), and Medicaid (70 percent). Instead, they prefer to slash waste—a category that, in their fantasy world, seems to include 50 percent of spending, according to a 2009 Gallup poll.

Needless to say, it』s impossible to balance the budget by listening to these people. But politicians pander to them anyway, and even encourage their misapprehensions. As a result, we』re now arguing over short-term spending cuts that would cost up to 700,000 government jobs, imperiling the shaky recovery and impairing our ability to compete globally, while doing nothing to tackle the long-term fiscal challenges that threaten … our ability to compete globally.

Given our history, it』s hard to imagine this changing any time soon. But that isn』t to say a change wouldn』t help. For years, Stanford communications professor James Fishkin has been conducting experiments in deliberative democracy. The premise is simple: poll citizens on a major issue, blind; then see how their opinions evolve when they』re forced to confront the facts. What Fishkin has found is that while people start out with deep value disagreements over, say, government spending, they tend to agree on rational policy responses once they learn the ins and outs of the budget. 「The problem is ignorance, not stupidity,」 Hacker says. 「We suffer from a lack of information rather than a lack of ability.」 Whether that』s a treatable affliction or a terminal illness remains to be seen. But now』s the time to start searching for a cure.

The U.S. citizenship test is comprised of 100 questions, across five categories: American government, systems of government, rights and responsibilities, American history and integrated civics. Ten questions from the 100 are chosen randomly for the test-taker. To pass, one must get at least six right. In its poll of 1,000 people, the Daily Beast rotated the questions. Beyond the topline—62 percent of Americans passed, 38 percent failed—there are huge discrepancies in the kinds of civic knowledge Americans collectively possess. The following is a look at some of the questions and the percentage of people who got them right and wrong.

When was the Declaration of Independence adopted?
July 4, 1776.
Correct: 67%
Incorrect: 33%

What happened at the Constitutional Convention?
The Constitution was written, or the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution.
Correct: 35%
Incorrect: 65%

The Federalist Papers supported the passage of the U.S. Constitution. Name one of the writers.
James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, or Publius.
Correct: 12%
Incorrect: 88%

Who was president during World War I?
Woodrow Wilson.
Correct: 20%
Incorrect: 80%

Who did the United States fight in World War II?
Japan, Germany, and Italy.
Correct: 60%
Incorrect: 40%

During the Cold War, what was the main concern of the United States?
Communism.
Correct: 27%
Incorrect: 73%

What did Susan B. Anthony do?
Fought for women's rights or fought for civil rights.
Correct: 41%
Incorrect: 59%

What did Martin Luther King, Jr. do?
Fought for civil rights or worked for equality for all Americans.
Correct: 77%
Incorrect: 23%

Who is in charge of the executive branch?
The president.
Correct: 73%
Incorrect: 27%

We elect a U.S. senator for how many years?
Six.
Correct: 39%
Incorrect: 61%

The House of Representatives has how many voting members?
435.
Correct: 14%
Incorrect: 86%

If both the president and the vice president can no longer serve, who becomes president?
The speaker of the House.
Correct: 58%
Incorrect: 42%

Under our Constitution, some powers belong to the federal government. What is one power of the federal government?
To print money, to declare war, to create an army, or to make treaties.
Correct: 19%  
Incorrect: 81%

How many justices are on the Supreme Court?
Nine.
Correct: 37%
Incorrect: 63%

What do we call the first 10 amendments to the Constitution?
The Bill of Rights.
Correct: 57%
Incorrect: 43%

What is the supreme law of the land?
The Constitution.
Correct: 30%
Incorrect: 70%

How many amendments does the Constitution have?
27.
Correct: 6%
Incorrect: 94%

What is the name of the vice president of the United States now?
Joe Biden.
Correct: 71%  
Incorrect: 29%

What is the name of the speaker of the House of Representatives now?
John Boehner.
Correct: 41%
Incorrect: 59%

What is the economic system in the United States?
Capitalist or market economy.
Correct: 33%
Incorrect: 67%
明有物有則,索源清流潔。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

3
eztomcat 發表於 2011-3-23 12:53 | 只看該作者
本帖最後由 eztomcat 於 2011-3-23 12:53 編輯

Americans: A whole bunch of idiots.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

537

主題

4157

帖子

2270

積分

五星貝殼精英

新手上路(初級)

Rank: 4

積分
2270
4
mimidustie 發表於 2011-3-23 12:57 | 只看該作者
愚蠢還沒有關係,偏偏比較愚蠢的美國人正好是特別自大,排外,種族歧視的美國人,非常令人討厭!
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

0

主題

164

帖子

5372

積分

二級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
5372
5
meistersinger 發表於 2011-3-23 13:06 | 只看該作者
錯啦。

如果總統和副總統都無法繼續任職,誰將代任總統?
答案:白宮發言人 ====》Speaker of the House = 眾議院議長。
正確:58%
錯誤:42%
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

1萬

主題

2萬

帖子

2萬

積分

八級貝殼核心

倍可親決策會員(十九級)

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
22461
6
 樓主| laodai 發表於 2011-3-23 13:22 | 只看該作者
The speaker of the House.
議院的報告人
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-8-4 20:52

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表