Mrs. Black has a savings account with a nearby bank, and recently she started to receive statements not in accordance with her books. According to one notice, it said that she owed the bank $200,000. 「Are they really expecting my acceptance of this?」 she thought. So, accompanied by Mr. Black she marched in to the bank the next morning. After hearing her story the accountant behind the counter explained that 「there has been an accidental miscounting.」 」but this is not the first time. The book keeping has never been in accord with reality!」 Mrs. Black argued , and she insisted on withdrawing all her money. However, she was told that 「the computer is down」 and she couldn』t even access her money! By this time there were quite a few people standing in the access to the counter. They heard the conversation and of their own accord all took a stand in support of Mrs. Black. With one accord, they all accused the bank of not being accurate with their bookkeeping and insisted that measures be taken accordingly to achieve accuracy. As the number of customers accumulated, the Board members met and were in accordance that inaccuracy couldn』t be accepted and sent for the manager from his office accommodation to account for the mistakes. Dissatisfied with the fact that the manager failed to accomplish his duty and achieve accuracy in his performance, the Board reached an accord and fired the manager. They also accorded Mrs. Black 「favored Customer」 of the month.
It seems the two pieces you have posted here have one thing in common: The contents are dictated by the words within the alphabetical range set in the title. In other words, the passages you've posted are the results of some sort of a word game, with little concern for grammar, logic, or common sense.
It is therefore very misleading, and possibly damaging to the learners who will LEARN the passages instead of LAUGHING at them.
You should not present them as LEARNING material.