|
China would win. We wouldn』t use nukes and they have more people
中國會贏,我們不會使用核武器而他們有更多的人。
sorry buddy, but america is nuke happy and if any one f*cks with them, about 50 are headed in their direction
對不起,哥們,但美國是非常樂意使用核武器的,誰要敢招美國,就會有50顆彈頭對向他。
You are a f*cking dumbass. China has been stealing our nuclear military secrets for years. For all we know, they could sabotage our shit at the last minute.read and learn,dumbass
你是頭蠢驢,中國已經竊取我們的核技術很多年了,我們都知道,他們能在最後一分鐘破壞我們的裝備,多讀點書你這頭蠢驢。
Hey, buddy, truth is, WE WOULD WIN YOU *** ING COMMUNIST!!!!!!! Yeah, China, even though they put all their resources into military, they would lose. Our military is well treated and have more reason to fight other than for not being killed by government. You suck you anti-American… Die.
嘿,哥們,事實是我們將會戰勝你這個傻#共產主義分子,是的,中國,就算它把所有的資源都運用到軍事上,他們還是會輸。我們的軍隊待遇更好而且我們有除了避免被本國政府殺掉以外其他的戰鬥動機。你這個傻#反美國分子,去死吧。
I』m very pro american. I live in america… I even support the war in iraq (one of the few who apparently do)… thinking that my country would lose a war against a powerful country doesn』t make me a communist
我非常親美國,我生活在美國,我甚至支持美國在伊拉克的戰爭(很少公開支持這點的人之一)。考慮到我的國家會輸給一個強大的國家並不能把我變成一個共產主義分子。
China has more people and they are smarter. China>USA
中國人更多而且他們更聰明。 中國》美國
Wouldnt it be who attacks first?Like imagine if the US dropped about 1500 BIG nukes at the same time China couldnt retialiate but that could go either way I guess
難道不取決於誰先攻擊誰嗎?想象如果美國給中國同時投1500顆核彈,中國根本不是有報復的機會,當然,反過來也一樣。
Communists can do anything when motivated. War is a strong motivator for any country. They could get us if it came down to it. They have already begun to shift past industrialization. Plus they have russia above them. They could probabably get some technology om up there if they needed to om old soviet sympathizers
CD可以通過鼓勵號召而做到任何事情。戰爭對任何國家都是最好的號召手段。如果他們這樣做的話那他們會打敗我們。他們已經開始轉換舊工業了,而且他們上面是俄羅斯,他們可能能從他們舊日的蘇聯的同情者那裡搞到一些技術。
China has more people. But the US his superior military power (especially the navy). So the USA would kick china』s ass.
中國有更多的人口,但美國有更強大的軍事力量(特別是海軍)。所以美國可以擊敗中國。
technology can only do so much. They would just out number us
技術的作用是有限的,他們還是會以數量壓倒我們。
We arent connected by land, and we have the greatest navy in the world.
我們兩國陸地不接壤,而且我們有世界上最好的海軍。
We have the power of jesus.
我們有上帝支持我們。
Communists have a great work force that could be used to outnumber our navy. The greatest weakness of an army is its underestimating of others. Should the chinese make it to our soil we would loose
CD有巨大的勞動大軍,他們可以從數量上壓倒我們的海軍。一支軍隊最致命的弱點就是低估對手,只有他們能登陸美國,我們就輸定了。
China would kung-fu kick the U.S. in the balls.Too bad they have small penises.
中國人將會用功夫踢爛美國人那玩意。可不幸的是他們那玩意太小了。
Doesn』t matter, once that war would start many countries would severe trade connections weakening both countries but since China is the only country in the world with a self sustaining economy, they』d hardly be affected.
其他都沒有關係,一旦戰爭爆發很多國家都會中斷和兩國的貿易往來,這對兩個國家都會有影響,但由於中國是世界上唯一一個能自我維持的經濟體系,他們不會被影響很大。
Self sustaining economy my ass. Theres a resaon Japan and China have had tensions recently. Its becuase they are figthting over who will get Russias oil. They most definately dont have enough oil there to be self sufficent.Read, China imports oil. Actually, they are the big reason prices are jumping so d**n much
狗屁自我維持經濟,中國和日本的關係最近為什麼那麼緊張呀?就是因為它們為了爭奪俄羅斯的石油,他們絕對沒有自我維持所需要的石油。記住,中國進口石油,就就是他XX的油價漲的這麼快的原因!
If there was going to be a war between us it would be because of this. And I highly doubt it would take place in either China or the Americas. It would happen in the middle east. China needs oil. They absolutely need it to continue tohave any chance of being a strong power in the world. Russia is one option. The middle east, may be the way they go and we would protect our intrests. And all of a sudden we have a war on our hands.
沒錯,如果中美真要發生戰爭的話,肯定是因為石油這麼問題。而且我不認為戰爭會發生在美國和中國任何一方的國土上,戰爭可能會發生在中東地區。中國需要石油,他們絕對需要石油去繼續他們成為世界強國的努力。俄羅斯是他們的一個選擇,但中東可能是他們要去的地方,那麼我們就會去保衛自己的利益,然後忽然間,我們就處於戰爭狀態了。
And whats more a war right where the chinese would be in a good position to have one. Of course they would never invade The United States of America…. unless they had a great plan. But the middle east is another thing entirely. In a place where land is really the only thing to fight on. China would win. Well we could just use hydrogen cells. Anyway, the thing about the chinese is that they』re group oriented so all you have to do is sit a machine gun in ont of their military base and shoot them all when they run out. I saw it in a WWII movie. That』s why we won WWII so easy.Anyway, The thing about the chinese is that most of them have never heard of a plane or a loud siren so all we have to do is chopper in some sirens, call in an air strike, scare them all off and send in the troops. While they』re shocked we will clean up their army and make the civilians join our army.
還有中國的優勢在於,當然他們不會去入侵美國,除非他們有更大的計劃。但是對中東就是完全是另一種情況了,在中東除了佔領土地就沒什麼其他可圖利益了,所以中國會取勝。我們應該用氫能源代替汽油。還有中國人是以集體思想為中心的,所以我們只需要在他們的軍事基地外面架挺機槍,等他們跑出來以後把他們全射死,我看的一部二戰電影就是這樣的,這就是我們為什麼那麼輕鬆的就贏了二戰。再有就是大部分中國人從來沒有聽到過飛機和警報的聲音,我們只需要讓直升機響起警報,對他們進行空襲,把他們都嚇壞了以後派我們的軍隊過去繳了他們的武器,然後讓老百姓加入我們的軍隊就可以了。
You are underestimating nationalism。
你低估了他們的民族主義精神。
Well, they do have the power of culture and nationalism but then again if we napalm their rice then they will starve. Also we could easily defeat the chinese people in hand to hand combat because that karate stuff is no match for a good American Boxer. One clean punch and the chinese is gone.I think we should basically just use machine guns because there are so many people there. All we have to do is equip a few fast hum vees with hydrogen cells and machine guns with wooden bullets so we only injure them and then make the injured guys be in our army to even up the odds.Also asian girls love white guys so we could get half of their population on our side and make more troops that way.
當然他們有很強的文化和民族主義精神,但還是那樣,如果我們能炸了他們的稻田那他們就會挨餓,而且我們可以在短兵相接的戰鬥中不費吹灰之力就能取勝,中國空手道根本不是美國拳擊的對手,乾淨漂亮的一拳就能把中國人打飛。我想我們還是用機槍,因為中國人實在太多了。我們只需要幾部用氫燃料的高速吉普和機槍,機槍用木製子彈,那樣我們就可以只打傷他們,然後讓受傷的敵人加入我方,來彌補我方和敵方的人數差距。而且亞洲女孩喜歡白人小夥子,所以我們能夠爭取到中國人口的一半,然後通過她們製造更多我們的軍隊。 |
|