倍可親

回復: 3
列印 上一主題 下一主題

對藥品上市后安全性再評價若干問題的探討

[複製鏈接]

7492

主題

1萬

帖子

2萬

積分

貝殼光明大使

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
23113
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
大千世界 發表於 2008-7-21 20:54 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/qi ... 001/0103/010329.htm
中國藥學雜誌
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
2001 Vol.36 No.3 P.205-209

郭曉昕  顏敏  張素敏  田春華  王蘭明  李少麗 

分類號:R951 文獻標識碼:E
文章編號:1001-2494(2001)03-


  藥品上市前的臨床研究受到諸多因素的限制,使其安全性評價內容不充分,勢必影響藥物的合理應用,導致藥品上市后出現各種安全性問題。通過對藥品安全性問題的深入研究和對藥品安全性進行科學再評價,可不斷提高我國藥品監督管理水平,促進臨床合理用藥,保障人民健康。

  1 正確認識藥品上市后的安全性問題

  近百年來,尤其近年,大量藥品不斷上市,在人類防病、治病、保障人民健康過程中發揮了重要作用,同時人們也逐漸認識其不良反應給人類帶來的危害。據1998年美國153家醫院研究指出:從1966年到1996年,在美國的住院患者中,嚴重藥物不良反應發生率為6.9%,由此而致死的約為0.32%。即使按照醫師的醫囑適時適量服藥,1994年全美國仍然有221.6萬住院患者對所服藥物發生藥物不良反應,其中10.6萬人因此而死亡。其死亡比例在住院患者死因排序中占第五位[1]。上述調查所顯示的令人震驚的數據可從以下幾方面得到答案。
  1.1 產品缺陷 是產生不良反應事件的的重要方面,可通過生產、質控等環節的監控來預防。
  1.2 已知不良反應 在已知不良反應中,有的是不可避免的,有的則可通過藥品的正確選擇和使用2個環節避免或減小到最低程度。不良反應通常在產品開發和上市前的審查過程中即發現、引起關注,並充分進行了風險-利益評估。藥品使用說明書會說明患者的選擇、劑量的選擇和調整、藥物間相互作用以及如何監測藥品不良反應和減少毒性應採取的措施。①可避免性不良反應:據估計逾半數的藥品不良反應是可以避免的[1],讓醫生了解此類潛在的不良反應和說明如何最大限度降低這些風險是產品使用說明書的主要目標。為了避免該類不良反應,醫生應選擇最佳治療方案,並採取適宜的措施。例如,患者服用腎毒性藥物時,採取水化辦法,並對腎功能不全患者調整劑量。醫生也可能選擇錯誤的治療方案,如使用抗生素治療病毒性感染;醫生所開處方正確,但沒有個體化或沒有監測患者的不良反應。②不可避免不良反應: 在很多情況下已知不良反應是不可避免的,即使選擇最佳治療方案、正確使用藥品,不良反應仍可發生,此類風險是在獲得治療利益同時付出的不可避免的代價。對於此類風險,應讓醫生和患者充分認識到在治療過程中可能帶來的風險,並密切監測接受治療的患者。
  1.3 非預期不良反應 藥品上市前的臨床研究具有很大的局限。由於藥品上市前的臨床研究病例太少又多數為中年人、目的太單純、使用面太窄、研究時間太短,使某些不良反應在上市前很難觀察到。如發生率在1/1萬~1/10萬的不良反應、誘發期很長的不良反應,個體特性反應,未研究人群如兒童、老年人等的反應,同時發生的疾病或合併用藥相互作用所造成的後果等在藥品上市前的安全評價中很難觀察到。因此藥品上市後有關利益和風險的不可知作用總是存在的。非預期嚴重不良反應事件經常受到廣泛的關注,因為這類嚴重不良反應事件不像已知不良反應那樣容易被接受,此類風險是藥品上市后安全再評價的重點。
  1.4 藥物治療錯誤 這類錯誤包括藥品的不正確服用、非故意或藥名易混淆時拿錯葯、一時疏忽導致過量服藥。這類錯誤不可能完全阻止,但通過對系統的干預可將其減小到最低程度。
  人們在接收藥物治療時都希望藥品安全有效,但安全並不意味著藥品不良反應為零。安全的藥品意味著具有合理的風險、最大限度獲得預期的收益。因此,藥品上市后安全性再評價必須遵循此原則,以期使上市后藥品最大限度地發揮防病治病作用。

  2 藥品上市后風險/利益尺度的把握

  藥品上市后,不良反應信息接踵而來。藥品安全性再評價的核心在於利益-風險分析,通過利益-風險評估,對上市后藥品採取撤消、限制使用和修改說明書等手段,以保障合理用藥。
  2.1 撤消藥品 經利益-風險評估,風險大於利益的藥品,應從市場上撤消,對於有替代治療的藥物更應從嚴把關。非甾體抗炎葯溴芬酸於1997年7月份投放美國市場,用於治療短期急性疼痛,一般用藥期少於10 d,大多數情況用於牙科或術后。然而一些患者長期服用,超出了藥品使用說明書範圍,出現肝毒反應。1998年2月,溴芬酸藥品使用說明書警告項下增加了該方面的內容。繼而,長期用藥處方減少,有關肝臟的嚴重不良反應隨之減少,但並沒有杜絕。美國FDA認為限制該葯只能用10 d不切實際,因而也無法奏效,於是,Wyeth公司於1998年6月自願將本產品撤出市場[2]。美國FDA從1980年至1997年近20年間撤消了13種新葯[1],1979~1998年間上市新葯撤消比例為1%~3.5%,在多數情況下是在藥品上市后1~2年內撤消的,有的藥品是在上市后3~5年內撤消的,最長時間為24.2年[3],具體情況見表1和表2。……


作者單位:郭曉昕(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
     顏敏(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
     張素敏(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
     田春華(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
     王蘭明(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
     李少麗(國家藥品監督管理局藥品評價中心,北京 100061) 
參考文獻:

[1]  孫忠實,朱珠.必須關注藥品上市后的再評價[J].中國醫藥導報,2000,2(1):49~50.
[2]  Wyeth on US withdrawal of duract[J].Scrip,1998,2348:21.
[3]  Jane Henney. Managing the Risks from Medical Product Use[EB/OL]. http://www.fda.gov/oc/tfrm/riskmanagement.pdf,2000:8-15
[4]  Index of Safety-related Drug Labelling Change Summaries Approved by FDA January-December[EB/OL].http://www.fda.gov/../medwatch/safety/1999/index99.htm,2000-7-26

[ 本帖最後由 大千世界 於 2008-7-23 09:53 編輯 ]

7492

主題

1萬

帖子

2萬

積分

貝殼光明大使

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
23113
沙發
 樓主| 大千世界 發表於 2008-7-21 21:23 | 只看該作者
原帖由 大千世界 於 2008-7-21 20:54 發表 [對藥品上市后安全性再評價若干問題的探討 - 學術教育 -  backchina.com]  
http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/qikan/Periodical.Articles/zgyxzz/zgyx2001/0103/010329.htm
中國藥學雜誌
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
2001 Vol.36 No.3 P.205-209
郭曉昕  顏敏  張素敏  田春華  王 ...
即使按照醫師的醫囑適時適量服藥,1994年全美國仍然有221.6萬住院患者對所服藥物發生藥物不良反應,其中10.6萬人因此而死亡。其死亡比例在住院患者死因排序中占第五位[1]


可見西藥的中毒十分常見. 為什麼祗能見到你發表中藥的毒副作用. 如果你真是一個醫生. 對於你自己的專業西藥的毒副作用卻是視而不見呢? 請你也多介紹一些西藥的毒副作用. 發揮你的專長.

[ 本帖最後由 大千世界 於 2008-7-21 21:24 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

7492

主題

1萬

帖子

2萬

積分

貝殼光明大使

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
23113
3
 樓主| 大千世界 發表於 2008-7-22 01:16 | 只看該作者
原帖由 大千世界 於 2008-7-21 21:23 發表 [對藥品上市后安全性再評價若干問題的探討 - 學術教育 -  backchina.com]  
可見西藥的中毒十分常見. 為什麼祗能見到你發表中藥的毒副作用. 如果你真是一個醫生. 對於你自己的專業西藥的毒副作用卻是視而不見呢? 請你也多介紹一些西藥的毒副作用. 發揮你的專長.


代你發帖. 看看西藥是如何害死人的.

抗生素致偽膜性腸炎62例臨床分析
中華首席醫學網    2007年03月12日 22:17:24 Monday  
作者:李曉利 張永東 樊一鋼
《河北醫藥》2006年2月34卷2期 藥物不良反應
http://journal.shouxi.net/html/q ... 0436286_248192.html   
【關鍵詞】  偽膜性腸炎/診斷;偽膜性腸炎/治療;抗生素/治療應用;去甲萬古黴素

  【摘要】   目的   通過對抗生素所致偽膜性腸炎研究,總結臨床經驗教訓,提高診治水平。方法   對我院1998年至2005年62例臨床使用抗生素引起偽膜性腸炎的患者從年齡、性別、合併疾病、抗生素的使用種類、時間、發病時間、治療方法等方面進行回顧性總結及分析。結果  偽膜性腸炎多發於合併有長期慢性疾病、年齡大、體質差、術后及抗生素應用不規範的老年患者。結論   抗生素應用不合理是引起偽膜性腸炎的主要原因,對長期大量使用抗生素的老年患者出現腹脹、腹瀉現象時,首先應考慮有無偽膜性腸炎。

  【關鍵詞】   偽膜性腸炎/診斷;偽膜性腸炎/治療;抗生素/治療應用;去甲萬古黴素
      
  偽膜性腸炎是多見於結腸上覆蓋偽膜的急性粘膜壞死性炎症,89%~100%是由難辨梭狀桿菌(CD)所致[1],常發生於使用廣譜抗生素、某些嚴重疾患及手術后腸道難辨梭狀芽胞桿菌過度繁殖,釋放毒素引起以腹瀉為突出表現的腸道癥狀和毒血症。起病突發,發展迅猛,病情嚴重者可導致死亡,病死率高達10%~38%[2],尤以老年人及免疫功能低下者多見,結腸鏡檢查見典型的偽膜有確診意義。

  1   臨床資料

  1.1   一般資料   我院1998年至2005年收治患者62例,其中男37例,女25例;年齡28~86歲,平均68歲,其中>70歲者40例佔64.5%。骨科手術后43例,手術后傷口感染8例,急性腸道感染5例,急慢性膽道感染3例,燒傷、顱腦外傷等其他疾病3例。腹瀉前所用抗生素為頭孢類41例,喹諾酮類7例,青霉素類4例,大環內酯類3例,林可黴素2例,其他類抗生素5例。其中單用一種上述抗生素27例,兩種以上35例。抗生素藥物的使用劑量均按成人劑量,在使用抗生素時發生腹瀉38例,停止使用抗生素后發病24例,腹瀉前抗生素應用時間最短3 d,最長24 d,平均8 d。

  1.2   臨床表現   (1)腹瀉:全部病例均有水樣腹瀉,每日5~20餘次,其中呈黃綠色31例,海藍色17例,粘液膿血便11例,大便中可見膜狀漂浮物16例。(2)腹痛:臍周及中下腹隱痛46例,曾發生陣發性劇痛4例。(3)全身中毒癥狀:發熱(體溫38~39℃)、乏力47例,休克、神志改變4例。(4)輕至中度腹脹52例,噁心、嘔吐8例。(5)大部分病例在病變初期腸鳴音亢進,隨著病情的加重,腸鳴音逐漸減弱,甚至出現腹膜刺激征。

  1.3   實驗室檢查   血白細胞升高56例,水電解質紊亂47例,低蛋白血症43例,低鈉血症32例,糞檢見膿細胞、大便塗片革蘭陽性桿菌23例,大便常規細菌培養全部為陰性。結腸鏡檢32例均有粘膜充血、水腫,可見黃白色偽膜。開始腹瀉到確診時間3~6 d,平均4 d。

  1.4   誤診疾病   急性細菌性痢疾12例,細菌性結腸炎6例,急性腸炎6例,潰瘍性結腸炎3例。

  1.5   治療與歸轉   治癒57例,死亡5例,其中3例突然發病,來勢兇險,癥狀無特異性而誤診誤治,2例由於患者年齡大,體質差,合併有嚴重的心血管及肝腎疾病。全部病例在確診后立即停用或改用抗生素。輕度病例給予口服萬迅(去甲萬古黴素,華北製藥廠生產)0.4 g,每6小時1次,嚴重病例靜脈滴注萬迅,成人每天1.6 g,分2次用。同時口服金雙歧調整菌群失調,4片/次(0.5億/片),每日3次,溫開水送服。同時加強支持治療,維持水、電解質及酸鹼平衡。

  2   討論

  偽膜性腸炎患者一般都有使用抗菌藥物或抗癌藥物的病史,停用抗菌藥物后仍發展為偽膜性腸炎,這―特點有利於臨床工作中對該疾病的認識[3]。據我們臨床統計在使用抗生素過程中發病佔73%,停用抗生素后發病佔27%。出現偽膜性腸炎不―定都是由難辨梭狀芽胞菌所致。在我們本組病例中有5例未檢出難辯梭狀芽胞菌。腹瀉程度和次數不一,輕型病例,大便每日2~3次。重者有大量腹瀉,大便每日可達30餘次,有時腹瀉可持續4~5周,少數病例可排出斑塊狀偽膜,血便少見。腹瀉為本病最主要的癥狀,常伴有輕度腹痛,有時腹痛很劇烈,並見腹脹、噁心、嘔吐,易被誤診為急腹症、手術吻合瘺等。腹瀉嚴重者可在短期內發生低血壓、休克、嚴重脫水、電解質失平衡以及代謝性酸中毒、少尿,甚至急性腎功能不全,還可導致心動過速、發熱、譫妄以及定向障礙等毒血症表現。本病多發於免疫功能低下、慢性消耗性疾病、惡性腫瘤及外科手術後患者,老年人由於其生理特點及多伴有慢性疾病,尤為多見,本文統計老年人達64.5%。回顧總結本組病例均存在抗生素藥物使用量過大、廣譜抗生素使用過濫的情況,尤其沒有考慮老年人普遍存在肝臟代謝率低下、腎臟排泄功能下降、藥物在體內的蓄積現象隨年齡的增長而加劇的情況,所以在成人年齡組使用不會發生問題的藥物劑量,對老年人就可能出現問題,應值得我們注意。總結經驗教訓,加強無菌觀念,嚴格無菌操作和遵守外科基本原則,盡量不用或少用抗生素,不能預防性使用廣譜抗生素。對需用抗生素治療的患者,應先做抗生素敏感試驗,根據其結果使用有效抗生素。無條件或條件不允許時,應根據診斷,在引起該病的常見細菌和抗生素的抗菌譜加以選用。藥物劑量應按照年齡、病情而定,以較小劑量為宜。盡量口服或肌肉注射,以減少純吸收。應盡量避免靜脈給廣譜抗生素,非用不可時,其劑量、濃度、速度,均應偏小、偏低、偏慢,且應把1日劑量分次給予,必須糾正1日劑量短時間內一次靜脈給予的辦法。針對老年人用藥劑量應從50歲開始,每增加1歲應減少成人用量1%,60歲以上用成人劑量1/3,70歲用1/4,80歲用1/5;須從最小劑量開始,逐步增加至最佳劑量[4]。除去甲萬古黴素外,幾乎所有抗生素均可致抗生素相關性結腸炎,及至偽膜性腸炎,其中以氨苄青霉素、氯林可黴素、頭孢菌素等最常見,廣譜抗生素較窄譜高10~70倍[5]。頭孢類41例(66.1%),喹諾酮類7例(11.3%),青霉素類4例(6.5%),大環內脂類5例(4.8%),林可黴素2例(3.2%),其他類抗生素5例(8.1%),和上述觀點基本吻合。我們在實踐中體會到,如果臨床徵象符合偽膜性腸炎,連續直接塗片查大便桿球菌比例是一種最簡單而方便的診斷方法,正常人大便桿球菌比例為3.5~5∶1。雖然早期大便桿球菌比例並不失調,為4∶1或3∶1,但一般1~2 d后桿球菌比例明顯失調為1∶1或倒置,即可確診。不一定要等待大便培養或血培養,以防延誤治療。一旦高度懷疑或確診本病,首先應立即停用所有抗菌藥物,其次要加強支持治療,維持水、電解質及酸鹼平衡。難辯梭狀芽胞桿菌對甲硝唑和去甲萬古黴素敏感,目前提倡的用藥方式是用甲硝唑和去甲萬古黴素口服,但甲硝唑的使用有可能使腸道菌群失調進一步加重。如果不是難辨梭狀芽胞桿菌導致的偽膜性腸炎,用甲硝唑治療是無效的;當病情發展到嚴重腹膜炎導致腸功能障礙時,口服去甲萬古黴素不能達到病變部位。所以,在不能肯定病原菌的情況下,尤其是病情危重時,以去甲萬古黴素靜脈用藥才是最有效的治療方法。

  參考文獻

  1   Robert Fekt.Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of clostridium difficileassociated diarrhed and colitis.The American Journal of Gastroenterology,1997,92:739750.

  2   李國昌,周祖珉,孫兆發消化系急症內外科搶救指南第1版:北京:中國醫藥科技出版社,1996123

  3   Wei SC,Wong JM,Hsueh PR,et al.Diagnostic role of endscopy,stool culture and toxin Ain clostridium difficile associate disease.J Formos Med Assoc,1997,96:879883.

  4   謝雁鳴老年常見病用藥指南第1版北京:人民衛生出版社,1993.7

  5   鄭芝田胃腸病學第2版北京:人民衛生出版社,1986696

  作者單位: 710054   陝西省西安市紅十字會醫院

[ 本帖最後由 大千世界 於 2008-7-23 09:54 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

7492

主題

1萬

帖子

2萬

積分

貝殼光明大使

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
23113
4
 樓主| 大千世界 發表於 2008-7-22 01:56 | 只看該作者
http://www.emedmag.com/html/pre/gic/consults/061503.asp
GI Consult: Pseudomembranous Colitis

Who is vulnerable to pseudomembranous colitis and what complications might they develop? How does the clinician determine which diagnostic stool test to order? What are the considerations in choosing between metronidazole and vancomycin? These and other issues are discussed.

By Marc S. Itskowitz, MD, and Paul J. Lebovitz, MD

Dr. Itskowitz is assistant professor of medicine at Drexel University College of Medicine and associate director of the internal medicine residency program at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dr. Lebovitz is director of the division of gastroenterology at the same hospital.


What is pseudomembranous colitis?

Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) is a toxin-mediated enteric disease caused by Clostridium difficile. It has been increasingly recognized as a serious and sometimes lethal gastrointestinal disease. During the past decade, considerable advances have been made in our understanding of the pathophysiology of diarrhea and colitis caused by C. difficile infection. Nonetheless, this tenacious organism continues to infect millions of patients each year and poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Pseudomembranous colitis was first described in 1893 when a patient with severe diarrhea was found to have "diphtheritic colitis" at autopsy. The condition was attributed to mucosal ischemia or viral infection until 1977, when it was reported that stool specimens from affected patients contained a toxin that produced cytopathic changes in tissue-culture cells. Within a year of that report, C. difficile, a spore-forming, gram-positive, anaerobic bacillus, was identified as the source of the cytotoxin.

Most cases of PMC over the last three decades have occurred in association with antimicrobial therapy. Nearly all antimicrobial agents have been implicated in causing PMC. Clindamycin, cephalosporins, and penicillins are the antibiotics most frequently associated with C. difficile diarrhea. Other risk factors for PMC include advanced age, hospitalization, inflammatory bowel disease, chemotherapy, and immunosuppression.
  

What is the clinical presentation of PMC?

Typical features of PMC include watery diarrhea, with as many as 15 to 30 stools per day. Most patients complain of abdominal pain or cramps, and they often have lower quadrant tenderness in association with fever and leukocytosis. Fever may be absent, low-grade, or quite high. The most common extraintestinal manifestation is an oligoarticular, asymmetric, large joint arthropathy. The peripheral leukocyte count is usually in the range of 10,000 to 20,000/mm3, but it may be much higher.

Pseudomembranous colitis causes an enteropathy that results in protein loss in the stool, leading to hypoalbuminemia. Stool examination may show occult blood, but grossly bloody stools are unusual. Microscopic examination for white blood cells is often positive.

Fulminant colitis develops in approximately 1% to 3% of patients. Serious complications include dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, hypotension, hypoalbuminemia with anasarca, and toxic megacolon. Colonic perforation is a rare but devastating complication.
  

What is the pathophysiology of PMC?

The following chain of events results in PMC: a disruption of the normal bacterial flora of the colon, colonization with C. difficile, and release of toxins that cause mucosal damage and inflammation. Antibiotic therapy is the key factor that alters the colonic flora and allows C. difficile to flourish. Antibiotic exposure may be as brief as a preoperative prophylactic dose. Chemotherapy agents that possess antibacterial properties may also result in sufficient disturbance of the intestinal microflora to allow colonization with C. difficile.

First described in 1935, C. difficile survives well in nature and is widely distributed in the environment. It can be cultured from stool in 5% of healthy adults, in 10% to 30% of symptomatic hospital and nursing home patients, and in 30% to 50% of healthy infants. Therefore, the mere presence of C. difficile does not necessarily indicate disease.

At least two toxins are involved in the disease process: toxin A (or enterotoxin) and toxin B (or cytotoxin). Both are heat-labile proteins that activate the release of cytokines from human monocytes. These proinflammatory effects on leukocytes are instrumental in inducing the marked colonic inflammation seen in PMC.


What are the pathologic findings in PMC?

Pseudomembranes are present in the intestinal mucosa. On gross inspection, there are multiple elevated yellow-white plaques (see image, below) in PMC, which vary in size from 2 to 20 millimeters. The intervening mucosa appears normal or shows hyperemia and edema. With advanced disease, the pseudomembranes may coalesce and eventually slough, leaving large denuded areas.


Endoscopic evidence. Characteristic raised, adherent, yellow-white plaques are visible on the colonic mucosa in PMC. The intervening mucosa is hyperemic but not ulcerated.




Histologic studies show that the pseudomembrane typically arises from a point of superficial ulceration and is accompanied by an acute or chronic inflammatory infiltrate in the lamina propria. Bacterial invasion of the bowel mucosa by C. difficile does not occur; PMC is a toxin-mediated disease.


How does one evaluate a patient with suspected PMC?

Pseudomembranous colitis should be considered in any patient with diarrhea and recent exposure to antimicrobials. The suspicion should be increased if the patient has severe, prolonged diarrhea and leukocytosis.

Stool findings are nonspecific, although patients with pancolitis usually have fecal leukocytes. Radiologic findings are also nonspecific but may be helpful in patients with advanced disease. Plain films of the abdomen may show a markedly edematous and distended colon and distorted haustral markings. Diagnostic accuracy is improved with air-contrast studies, which must be performed with caution because of the potential complication of colonic perforation. Computed tomography (CT) often shows a thickened colon, with evidence of ascites. However, nearly half of patients with PMC have normal CT findings.

Although not usually required for diagnosis, endoscopy may reveal the typical mucosal plaque-like lesions. Since the distal colon is involved in most patients, sigmoidoscopy is usually performed. However, in as many as one third of patients, the lesions are restricted to the right colon, which would require colonoscopy for detection. In general, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be avoided in fulminant colitis because of the risk of perforation.

The most accurate diagnostic test for C. difficile detection is the cytotoxin assay using tissue-cultured cells (see table, below). Multiple alternative tests are available and are readily used because they can be performed easily, provide quick results, and are cost-effective. The preferred method for most laboratories is enzyme immunoassays (EIA) that can detect toxins A and B. The sensitivity of these tests ranges from 70% to 90%; the specificity, 95% to 100%.

Stool Tests for Diagnosis of C. Difficile Infection

Test
  
Detects
  
Advantages
  
Disadvantages
  

cytotoxin assay toxin B gold standard

highly sensitive and specific
   requires tissue culture facility

takes 24-48 hours
   
enzyme immunoassay toxin A or B fast

easy to perform

high specificity
  not as sensitive as
cytotoxin assay
latex agglutination
assay  bacterial enzyme
(glutamate
dehydrogenase)  fast

inexpensive

easy to perform
   poor sensitivity and specificity
culture toxigenic and nontoxigenic
C. difficile sensitive

allows strain typing in epidemics
   requires aerobic culture

not specific for toxin-producing bacteria

takes 2-5 days
  
polymerase chain reaction toxin A or B
genes in isolates ordirectly in feces
   high sensitivity and specificity requires expertise in molecular diagnostic techniques
  



It is useful to test more than one stool specimen for C. difficile toxin. Performing EIA on two or three specimens increases the diagnostic yield by 5% to 10%. Assays for C. difficile toxin are unnecessary immediately after the completion of treatment; the results may be misleading, since about one-third of patients for whom therapy is successful have positive assays.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with the use of specific primers based on the genes for toxins A and B, has been used to detect toxigenic C. difficile. Although this is a highly sensitive and specific test, PCR is laborious and requires an initial culture of C. difficile.


What is the treatment for PMC?

Therapy for PMC includes discontinuation of implicated antimicrobial agents, administration of antimicrobial agents directed against C. difficile, and supportive measures. Diarrhea will resolve without specific antimicrobial therapy in 15% to 25% of patients. Supportive measures include intravenous (IV) fluids to correct dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. Nutritional support may be required to correct hypoalbuminemia. Antiperistaltic agents should be avoided because they may delay clearance of toxins from the colon, leading to increased colonic injury, ileus, and toxic dilation.

Antimicrobial options include oral metronidazole or vancomycin for 10 days. Antibiotic treatment should be oral, since C. difficile is restricted to the lumen of the colon. If IV treatment is necessary because the patient cannot tolerate oral medication or a feeding tube, only metronidazole is effective. Vancomycin should not be given intravenously because effective colonic luminal concentrations cannot be attained by this route.

Comparative clinical trials indicate that metronidazole and vancomycin are therapeutically equivalent. Disadvantages of vancomycin are cost and a possible role in promoting growth of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Metronidazole is often favored as first-line therapy because it is less expensive than vancomycin. Indications for oral vancomycin are pregnancy, lactation, intolerance of metronidazole, or failure to respond to metronidazole after three to five days of treatment. Symptomatic improvement can be expected within 72 hours, and diarrhea and colitis resolve completely in more than 95% of patients after 10 days of treatment.

Seriously ill patients who have fulminant or intractable symptoms may require intestinal surgery. The major indications for surgery are failure to respond to medical management, with progressive organ failure, toxic megacolon, or signs of peritonitis. The preferred procedure is a colectomy with a temporary diverting ileostomy.


What is the relapse rate in patients treated for PMC?

Clostridium difficile diarrhea recurs in up to 20% of cases. Subsequent relapses may occur in approximately 8% of cases after treatment of the initial relapse. Studies have found variable relapse rates, but comparative trials have shown no difference in incidence based on treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin. The typical clinical pattern is recurrence of diarrhea 3 to 10 days after treatment is discontinued.

Treatment of a relapse is a second course of antimicrobial therapy. There is no clear rationale for using vancomycin as a treatment for a relapse after metronidazole therapy, since the development of antibiotic resistance is not usually the cause of a relapse. Treatment of patients with multiple relapses is controversial; it may include prolonged antibiotic therapy and the administration of other agents, including cholestyramine, lactobacilli, Saccharomyces boulardii, or IV immune globulin. Enemas with human stool have been suggested as a means of reconstituting normal flora, but this approach lacks aesthetic appeal and carries the risk of transmitting infection. (There have also been anecdotal reports of success with yogurt enemas.)
  

What infection control measures are necessary for patients with PMC?

Clostridium difficile is a major nosocomial pathogen. Some hospitals and long-term facilities have reported epidemics of diarrhea caused by this agent. The organism can be cultured from hospital floors, toilets, bedpans, bedding, mops, scales, and furniture, especially in hospital rooms where patients with diarrhea from C. difficile infection have recently been treated. Patients in hospitals or nursing homes who have C. difficile-associated diarrhea should be cared for with enteric precautions, with assiduous attention to prevention of fecal-oral contamination. Extensive handwashing and use of vinyl gloves are important to prevent transmission. It is also desirable to assign patients with early-stage disease to private rooms.

[ 本帖最後由 大千世界 於 2008-7-23 09:49 編輯 ]
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-9-2 07:22

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表