馬承英語你了解多少？[討論]

現在英語教材豐富多采，對於馬承英語你了解多少？對於馬承英語你感覺如何？現在豐富多採的英語教材你比較信賴哪一種？我想做個調查，歡迎有興趣的朋友發表一下自己的看法。
     首先對於馬承英語我認為有他的優勢所在，他採用直呼式教法把英語和漢語拼音相結合，用學生熟悉的東西來學新的知識，這一點非常好，同時，他從基本入手，讓學生在學習時比較容易掌握48個音標，這一點我個人認為是非常成功的。當然這些都是我個人意見，大家有什麼好的意見我在這裡侯教了。

Understanding English is more important than memorizing words.

Too many people rely too much on this and that "methods" for speedy learning, but the fact is, there is no replacement for understanding and application.

Many new almost "illiterate" Chinese immigrants come to the U.S. without basic English knowledge and they can speak almost perfect English after a few years(OK, with some accent), and then there are many College Graduates from China who come here to become professionals, well into middle class demographic yet once they start to talk, even they themselves are ashamed of their own limited ability to communicate.

The difference is that the first group would speak without fear, and they always try to "understand" and "communicate", and the 2nd group always tries to "speak" and they never are able to talk that well.

Maybe it is time to forget about methods, and really try to understand and really communicate.

yep, 呂竹，I couldn't agree more~~~

呂竹，totally agree with you！

to my opinion, the purpose of learning a language is to communicate. learning grammar of the language is to help to learn how to speak and write it. there are many ways to achieve this purpose and sometime we might not pay too much attention on the methods...

謝謝你平安貝兒。

還在中國的時候，沒有上過大學，所以學英文學得比較自由。因為喜好中國古文，所以學了英文後還
讀了一些美國，英國的文學類的東西，又多少講了十年的英文，是而自以為學得不錯了。等到了美國后，才發現理論與現實的差異。當然英文Composition課比一般的美國同學強許多，但說起來，心裡沒有底。

多少年後的今天，特別的羨慕那些在美國低Socialeconomic Group的美國人群中生存的新移民，他們的生存能力，包括語言，要比整天想著如何應對下一個僱主面試的「中產人士」要強得多。

考托福當然要語法，但如果都是語法，就只好做語法老師了。我覺得「無所顧忌」的說，是學好英文的條件。瘋狂英語是一個開始。但如果是對著鏡子裡邊的自己喊，則又有些可笑了。

我同意，學英語會用是關鍵，不管用什麼方法關鍵是會用！