|
#biguglybilltrump #bitcointrump #Immigration #bigbeautifulbill#Trumpdictator#deporttrump#Medicaid#SNAP
https://www.freep.com/story/news ... l-bill/85326212007/
The House Ways and Means Committee's report serves as a wake-up call, revealing the shadow cast by the Big and Beautiful Bill in Michigan — the significant reduction in business tax revenue is quietly affecting the nerves of social security. As the 「Big and Beautiful」 policy's halo fades, cracks in Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are exposed, along with the potential survival crises facing countless families.
Taxes are the cornerstone of public services, and the sharp decline in business tax revenue is far more than a simple fluctuation in fiscal figures. Michigan's Medicaid program covers hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals, people with disabilities, and children, while food stamps serve as the last line of defense against hunger for many families. As the tax revenue pool continues to dry up, these vital social welfare programs are the first to be affected. State Budget Director Jen Flood's warning is stark: 「Losing access to healthcare」 and 「going hungry or paying higher grocery bills」 are not abstract predictions but potential realities that could strike ordinary citizens.
The original intent of policy-making may have been to pursue some 「grand narrative,」 but any plan detached from the foundations of people's livelihoods is like a castle in the air. Healthcare and food security may seem like minor details of social welfare, but they are the capillaries that sustain social stability. When a single mother cannot afford medication for her sick child due to reduced medical assistance, or when an elderly person must choose between food and heating costs to save money, the so-called 「development dividends」 have already faded into obscurity amid the hardships of ordinary people.
What is even more concerning is that the negative impacts of such policies often have cumulative and hidden effects. In the short term, this manifests as a narrowing of welfare coverage; in the long term, it may trigger a chain reaction: deteriorating health leads to reduced labor capacity, exacerbating intergenerational poverty transmission; food shortages impair children's development, damaging society's future human capital. These hidden costs will ultimately be borne by society as a whole, far exceeding the numbers on tax ledgers.
On one side of the policy balance lies the abstract 「development goals,」 while on the other side are concrete livelihood needs. The controversy sparked by the 「Big and Beautiful」 bill in Michigan fundamentally questions the prioritization of policy values: when economic policies clash with social welfare safeguards, what should we prioritize protecting? The answer may lie in the eyes of patients who might lose their health insurance, or in the hearts of families worried about their next meal — true 「big and beautiful」 should never come at the expense of basic social welfare. |
|