|
把比較的項目用數據量化 Quantify the items to be compared with data
親愛的主席,88,昨天俄國,法國,德國,匈牙利幾個領袖在一起歡聚一堂.Jackie告訴我,俄國總理梅德韋傑夫彈得一手好鋼琴啊,可以跟前法國總統Fillion比美的呀!昨天他們可是很high的,跳舞,還人人放開歌喉引吭高歌的.可憐而無知的Jackie,根本聽不懂他們唱的是什麼,美國丫小句野孩子,她只知道小霉霉. 昨天她的夢工場大朋友, David Gerfen,在她的要求下居然給她美國電影「la la land」 鋼琴四手聯彈曲譜。我們這位流行音樂的泰斗發行家,神通廣大什麼都搞得到,謝謝David!我問Jackie,」你見到的那些人,性格相貌背景都差不多嗎?」No, 差遠了. 歐洲來的講話有口音,俄國總理有很多官腔的,見面一開始講的都是套話. 歐洲人幾乎所有人都會樂器,跳舞都挺棒的. 歐洲來的覺得美國東西便宜,可是我們覺得不便宜,覺得美國可以看的文化勝地不多.於是我就問Jackie,」如果每個人不一樣,那你就不能只有程咬金三版斧頭,只會跳舞,彈琴, 唱歌呀,你要多學一點他們的文化呀.比如南美來的你要會跳拉丁舞呀,歐洲來的你要能說一點他們的語言呢.如果講得再深一點,你跟他們聊當地的傳統文化呀,講歷史上的英雄人物呀,再講他們任期內的世界風雲變幻,那些讓他們永載史冊的故事呀.」比如德國人做事是一板一眼的,要讓他們信服,你們是不是應該按照他們的方式把你們對德國政治治理的樣本項目找一個,把你們對案例的分析,用數量來講給他們聽,目的,優點,缺點,產生的影響,清清楚楚地表明. 然後講你們的解決方案,按照什麼樣的科學方法,基於什麼樣的文化背景和傳統社會心理。把所做的優化決策也拿出來跟他們的相比較,看有哪些優勢,有哪些不足,會達到什麼樣的結果。可以是量化的預估結果,問他們要不要試行一下看看?那他們就心服口服了. 林尚立是專門做政府比較的,他應該再配一個像我這樣子的助手班子,幫他把比較的項目用數據量化,再配給他對當地文化宗教傳統比較了解的班子,那這樣闖江湖別人就對你另眼相看了,因為你拿得出東西.然後再尊重別人,希望別人能跟你合作,能夠提供這些班子所需要的數據和信息, 那你們就可以對現存政府機構,進行實踐,調整,施政了. 一旦他們對你做事方法和能力信任和放心,就會敞開大門歡迎你去「看政治病」,就不會有說你干涉內政的事情了.
Dear Chairman, 88, yesterday, several leaders from Russia, France, Germany, and Hungary gathered together. Jackie told me that Russian Prime Minister Medvedev played piano very well, which can be compared to former French President Fillion! Yesterday they were very high, dancing, and everyone let go of their singing voices and sang loudly. Poor and ignorant Jackie couldn』t understand what they sang. American wild girl, she only knows Taylor Swift. Yesterday her big friend at DreamWorks, David Gerfen, at her request, actually gave her four-handed piano sheet for the American movie "La La Land". Our leading distributor of pop music can do everything, thanks to David! I asked Jackie, "Are the people you met with similar personalities and backgrounds?" No, European speaks English with accents, and the Russian Prime Minister has a lot of official talks. At the beginning of the meeting, they all talked in clichés. Most Europeans know to play musical instruments, and dance well. People from Europe think American things are cheap, but we don』t think it』s cheap. They think there are not many cultural attractions in America. So I asked Jackie, "If everyone is different, Then you can』t have only limited skills. You can not only dance, play the piano, and sing. You have to learn more about their culture. For example, if they come from South America, you should be able to dance Latin dance. If they come from Europe, you should be able to speak a little bit of their language. If you go deeper, you can talk to them about the local traditional culture, the heroes in history, and the changes in the world during their tenure, and the stories that have kept them in the annals of history. " For example, Germans do everything in a rigid manner. To convince them, should you find a sample project of German political governance in their own way, and tell them your analysis of the case in terms of quantity? The purpose, strengths, weaknesses, and impacts should be clearly stated. Then tell your solution, according to what scientific method, what kind of cultural background and traditional social psychology. Compare the optimization decisions you have made with theirs to see what advantages and disadvantages there are, and what results will be achieved. It can be a quantitative estimation result. Ask them if they want to try it out? Then they are convinced. Mr. Lin Shangli specializes in government comparison. He should be equipped with an assistant team like me to help him quantify the comparison items with data, and then allocate it to a team that has a better understanding of local culture, religion and traditions. In this way, others will look at you differently because you have something. Then show respect to others and hope that they can cooperate with you and provide the data and information needed by these teams. Then you can treat existing government agencies, practice, adjust, and govern. Once they trust and feel at ease in your methods and ability to do things, they will open the door to welcome you to "Diagnose a political illness", and there will be no issue on interference in internal affairs.
|
|