倍可親

回復: 0
列印 上一主題 下一主題

政治管理數字化

[複製鏈接]

3831

主題

3834

帖子

2萬

積分

八級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
22455
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
轉折點 發表於 2021-10-25 16:24 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
政府的運作, 可以很清楚有數學模型和數值對不同的部門評估  The operation of the government can clearly have mathematical models and numerical values to evaluate different sectors


http://news.***/us/2017/04/28/1817955.html

http://www.fragilestates.org/201 ... itical-development/

http://www.gaportal.org/how-to/m ... s-and-their-sources
治理可以用人工智慧軟體來取代,就避免很多的各種勢力的人為因素權斗  Governance can be replaced by artificial intelligence software, which avoids many human factors fighting

我早就料到了. 川普可信賴嗎? 她在鑽石吧高中的IB選課被錄取了. 我發現美國這邊對小孩子的批判性思維要求很高的. 也就是說對小孩子分析問題解決問題的邏輯要求高.  我今天去網上, 給她找有關宏觀微觀經濟和比較政治學, 其中有一項是說評價一個政府的政治運作有一些指標的,political indicators, for example, governance, democracy, Corruption, 這些居然都可以用數字來表達程度.  88, 如果這些政府的運作, 可以很清楚地列出不同的部門及評估方式和標準,那就可以產生一個政府的素質考量模型結構,並將分析評估產生的數據進行收集. 不同的政府有相似的大框架,和不同的差別. 如果有數學模型和數值,那就可以進行比較分析. 中國有沒有這樣的機構對全世界各個國家政府系統,進行模型的設立,數據的採集和評估?有沒有按照各個國家的經濟運作情況,和人口環境分佈加以對比,有沒有什麼結論? 比如在某些條件下,哪些政府的系統會產生這樣子的數據,以及什麼樣的模型會比較適合這樣子的條件? 還有,如果這個政府為了達到某些功能,比如說提升經濟,需要在政府方面做哪些改進?有沒有對中國的現有的制度進行分析,看看中國30 年高速增長的經驗是在什麼地方?可不可以用數學的公式和模型合理科學地呈現?政治最大部分是治理,而治理要靠科學. 科學就要有數學的表示. 當這些數據可以跟模型相聯繫的話,那以後治理那部分就可以用人工智慧軟體來取代,就避免很多的各種勢力的人為因素權斗. 誰看見在電力公司會為了對不同區域供電而各個部門打架的?我覺得這會改變政治生態呢,而且會影響到國家主權,也許以後全球會劃分成不同的行政區,而行政區的劃分是根據不同地區的人口環境經濟條件所決定的,是在一定典型的可以適用的數字模型下產生的. 88,你們現在有在做這個嗎?

I had expected it. Can Trump be trusted? She was accepted for the IB elective at Diamond Bar High School. I found that the American side has high requirements for critical thinking of children. That is to say, they have high logic requirements for children to analyze and solve problems. I went online today to help her find out about macro-microeconomics and comparative politics. One of them is that there are some indicators for evaluating the political operation of a government. Political indicators, for example, governance, democracy, corruption, can all be expressed in terms of numbers. 88, if the operation of these governments can be clearly listed for different departments and their evaluation methods,then standards can generate a government quality assessment model structure and collect the data generated by the analysis and evaluation. Different governments have similar large frameworks and differences between  departments. If there are mathematical models, numerical values can be compared and analyzed. Does China have such an organization to set up models, collect and evaluate data for government systems in various countries around the world? Is there any comparison based on the economic operation of each country and the distribution of the population environment? Are there any conclusions? For example, under certain conditions, which government systems will produce such data, and what models will be more suitable for this conditions?  Also, if the government needs to achieve certain functions, such as boosting economy, what improvements need to be made in the government? Have you analyzed China's existing system to see where China's 30 years of rapid growth experience is? Can it be presented scientifically and mathematically using mathematical formulas and models? The biggest part of politics is governance, and governance depends on science. Science must have mathematical representations. When these data can be linked to models, then the governance part can be replaced by artificial intelligence software, avoiding a lot of various human factors fight for power. Who has ever seen that in the power company, various departments are fighting for supplying power to different regions? I think this will change the political ecology and affect national sovereignty. Maybe the world will be divided into different administrative regions. The division of administrative regions is determined according to the population, environmental, and economic conditions in different regions. It can be applied in certain models generated under the digital model. 88, are you doing this now?
Nov 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM ISIS 讓我寫恐怖份子和ISIS. 怎麼說好呢? 其實恐怖分子這個定義不清不白, 因為它沒有說清楚背後代表的是哪一個利益組織. 中東,中亞,西亞,因為海上貿易航路的興旺而衰落.也因為宗教的控制使現代科技文明不能在這個地區散發光芒. 其實美國很早就有全球戰略,美國很清楚美洲只是地球的一端,地球的實際中心是在歐亞非大陸,而歐亞非的中心是在中西亞. 所以有海灣戰爭,伊拉克戰爭,根本不是為了石油.
您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-7-30 00:11

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表