建立各種因素組成的模型。

把大環境的經濟條件和人口素質，與各個地方當地的條件和環境因素相結合，建立起各種模式  Combine the economic conditions and population quality of the general environment with local conditions and environmental factors in various places to establish various models
在很多領域，其實美國的需求是不夠的，美國有太多的律師，但並沒有那麼多的法律糾紛. 少兒法庭無端製造冤假錯案，是為了保證有足夠的需要可以讓這些法官律師們有理由向政府申請經費，保住自己的飯碗. 這邊的律師都把小案子變大，越拖越長. 這邊的法官下一次開庭，都是定一個月以後.  中國是人口眾多發展中國家，中國致富的模式，適合廣大亞洲, 非洲, 拉丁美洲的人口眾多的國家. 當然中國發展模式有一些以環境為代價的缺陷，在應用的時候要鄭重考慮. 對某一地區來說，如果是經濟中下，但人口多，素質又比較好，就可以啟用代價小，但需要高智能而且收益高的模式，比如做軟體的，電影業，新的電訊，高科技，藝術類. 大部分智能不高的群體可以做勞工密集型. 經濟好，人口素質好，就可以做很多有創意的，高科技的東西，比如美國在網際網路，航空，醫療智能等領域. 如果有錢，人不是很多，有不那麼聰明，那就要多學一點理財，讓錢去賺錢，至少保住父母的血本，比如歐洲比利時，丹麥等。 他們是那麼小的國家，但他們靠金融業卻有很高的收入呢！如果經濟中下，人又素質不夠，要麼要多花精力在教育上，要提升素質。如果不行，要麼就只能做能力適合的事情. 最糟糕的是，能力不夠卻野蠻行事，片面窮兵黷武，或者販毒幫派橫行，這可不是什麼長久之計.  去了歐洲，發現他們對鄉鎮的綠色環保，做的非常好，無論北歐西歐，基本上都沒有污染. 人口密度也適中，沒有像亞洲大城市那麼擁擠嘈雜的. 去了中國，覺得中國各個省市鄉鎮，對如何因地制宜，發展與當地水土環境氣候相適應的經濟，是很有一套的. 於是就在想，有沒有人花點時間去做這方面的研究？把大環境的經濟條件和人口素質，與各個地方當地的條件和環境因素相結合，建立起各種模式. 如果要開發某一地區，在投資初期參照當地情況尋找選擇合適的模式就行了. 昨天說的，政府的官員們不光要有本地的文化背景，還最好有一些國際化背景，因為不是所有的地方官員，都聰明到自己知道去找適合當地情況的發展模式的，也不是全能的，不見得知道當地的經濟是可以和別的地方的經濟互補，是市場的上家和下家.

In many areas, the demand in the United States is actually not enough. There are too many lawyers in the United States, but there are not so many legal disputes. The children's court has no reason to create unjust, false and wrong cases in order to ensure that there is enough demand for these judges and lawyers to have The reason is to apply for funding from the government to keep their own rice bowls. Lawyers here have made small cases bigger and longer. The next time the judges are here, they are scheduled for one month. China is a developing country with a large population. The model of China's getting rich is suitable for a large number of countries with large populations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Of course, the Chinese development model has some shortcomings at the cost of the environment. It should be seriously considered when applying. For a certain region, if it is economic The middle and lower, but with a large population and good quality, you can use it at a low cost, but you need a high-intelligence and high-yield model, such as software, film industry, new telecommunications, high-tech, art. Most of the intelligence is not High groups can be labor-intensive. With a good economy and good population, you can do many creative and high-tech things, such as the United States Networking, aerospace, medical and intelligence and other fields. If you have money, not many people there are not so smart, it would have to learn a little more financial, money to make money, keep at least one parent of the original capital, such as Belgium, Denmark and so on. They are such a small country, but they have a high income from the financial industry! If the economy is down and the quality of people is not enough, we must either spend more energy on education and improve quality. If not, you can only do what's right for you. Worst of all, you don』t have enough ability to act savagely, one-sided soldiers, or drug gangs are rampant. This is not a long-term solution. I went to Europe and found that they are green to towns and villages. Environmental protection, doing very well, no pollution in Northern Europe and Western Europe. The population density is also moderate, not as crowded and noisy as the big cities in Asia. I went to China and felt that China's various provinces, cities and towns, how to adapt to local conditions, development and local The economy adapted to the soil, water, and environment is very comprehensive. So I was wondering if anyone would take the time to do this research? The economic conditions and population quality of the large environment are combined with local conditions and environmental factors in various places to establish various models. If you want to develop a certain area, you should look for the appropriate model in the early stage of investment based on local conditions. Yesterday That said, government officials must not only have a local cultural background, but also have an international background, because not all local officials are smart enough to know that they can find a development model that suits the local situation, and it is not almighty. It is not necessarily known that the local economy can complement the economy of other places, and it is the upper and lower house of the market.