倍可親

回復: 0
列印 上一主題 下一主題

物質設施不能保證人心相通。

[複製鏈接]

3831

主題

3834

帖子

2萬

積分

八級貝殼核心

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
22455
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
轉折點 發表於 2021-7-11 14:26 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
提供物質的設施,並不能夠保證人心之間的相通  Providing physical facilities does not guarantee communication between people
其次我覺得歐洲人在心底深處是最排外的,歐洲是最難讓外人進入社會生存的. 猶太人可以告訴你他們的遭遇. 而歐洲文化的冷漠和高昂的生活費用,使歐洲人口下降沒有足夠的人氣來支撐國家的發展. 歐洲人血液裡帶著一種心理上的疾病,這是違反上帝的意志的,違反人類發展規律的. 政府里有見識的人主張引進外來人口,但是在歐洲文化中的排外因素把負能量加在新來的移民者身上. 同時政府沒有提供當地人和新來者之間有效溝通的橋樑,光提供物質的設施,並不能夠保證人心之間的相通. 當然你可以說宗教文化不一樣,生活方式不一樣,但至少政府要有所作為. 如果政府提供一個舞台像你們這樣可以把當地的政府官員和穆斯林的宗教領袖們,每天聚在一起互相交流,互通有無,有什麼問題可以馬上知道,並尋找渠道及時加以解決. 如果有什麼認知上的衝突也坦誠布公出來,希望彼此有一個理解和寬容.  情形可能就不同了. 不要小看這種每天的直接的,在視頻中面對面的交流,因為這讓人看到誠意,這讓人看到人性,大家都是一樣的為了生活. 最讓人感受到,世界上的事情總有解決的辦法,不一定要通過武力和衝突. 不能坐下來好好談嗎? 當歐洲人對難民有這種排斥心態的時候,任何留下來的難民都不會過好日子,都會找機會生事兒的. 不光是對難民,對外來的,非本宗教的移民,都會是一樣的. 所以我覺得,如果造成ISIS的根本起源得到解決,除非那些日子過得不錯的新來的難民,其他的都應該回到原來的地方去. 可以聯合國的名義出資幫助難民回家園恢復,不應該把這些難民推向其他的國家.  而同時如果在全球範圍進行人口轉移的話,應該要有一個合理的調度,去的地方要有充分的準備,包括物質上和精神上的,個人和社區的, 去的新移民也要在這些方面有準備 .因為要融入一個社會,就算不是難民也都是很難的,更何況從小不是在那長大的,從一個有深厚文化歷史背景去適應另一個那麼深厚文化歷史的歐洲. 我在想也許中東地區,埃及,還有那些施坦國,缺人口的波羅的海國家,應該有一個規劃,逐步地接受外來人口. 這些國家要尋找適合自己國家的產業引進產業需要的人口,把這些地方的經濟的帶動起來. 這才是現在應該進行規劃和做的事呢.

Secondly, I think that Europeans are the most exclusive in their hearts. Europe is the most difficult place for outsiders to enter society. Jews can tell you what happened. And the indifference of European culture and the high cost of living have caused the European population to decline. There are not enough people to support the development of the country. Europeans carry a psychological disease in their blood, which is contrary to God 』s will and contrary to the law of human development. Insightful people in European governments advocate the introduction of foreign populations, but in Xenophobic factors in European culture add negative energy to new immigrants. At the same time, the government does not provide a bridge for effective communication between locals and newcomers. The provision of physical facilities alone does not guarantee people's hearts get connected. Of course you can say that their religious and cultural backgrounds are different and their lifestyles are different, but at least the government has to make a difference. If the government provides a stage for communication like yours, you can let local government officials and Muslim religious leaders get together every day to communicate with each other. Whatever problems can be known immediately, and find channels to solve them in a timely manner. If any cognitive conflicts are also frankly spoken, hoping to have mutual understanding and tolerance, then the situation may be different. Do not underestimate this daily , direct, face-to-face communication in the video, because it makes people see sincerity, it makes people see humanity, everyone is the same for life. The most people feel that things in the world are always solved The solution is not necessarily to be resolved by force and conflict. Can't everyone sit down and talk about it? When Europeans have such an attitude towards refugees, any refugees who stay will not live a good life and will look for opportunities to make troubles. Not only for refugees, foreign, non-religious immigrants, It will be the same. So I think that if the fundamental origin of ISIS can be solved, unless the new arrivals who have had a good time, everyone else should go back to the original place. It can be funded in the name of the United Nations to help refugees return to their homes instead of pushing them to other countries. At the same time, if population transfers are made globally, there should be an arrangement and reasonable scheduling, and people must be fully prepared where they go, including material uplifting and mental , personal and community. New immigrants must also be prepared in these respects, because it is difficult to integrate into a society, even if they are not refugees, not to mention growing up from a young age,  from an Asian society with a deep cultural and historical background, adapt to another European society with such a deep cultural history. I was thinking that maybe the Middle East, Egypt, and those Baltic countries, with less population of Stans, or countries with fewer population, should have a big plan to gradually accept foreign populations. These countries are looking for Industry suitable for their countries, bringing in the population needed by the industry, so as to promote the economy of these places. This is what should be planned and done now.
Nov 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM ISIS 讓我寫恐怖份子和ISIS. 怎麼說好呢? 其實恐怖分子這個定義不清不白, 因為它沒有說清楚背後代表的是哪一個利益組織. 中東,中亞,西亞,因為海上貿易航路的興旺而衰落.也因為宗教的控制使現代科技文明不能在這個地區散發光芒. 其實美國很早就有全球戰略,美國很清楚美洲只是地球的一端,地球的實際中心是在歐亞非大陸,而歐亞非的中心是在中西亞. 所以有海灣戰爭,伊拉克戰爭,根本不是為了石油.
您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-8-11 15:01

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表