Phylogenetic analyses of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reflected the several routes of introduction to Taiwan, the United States, and Japan
Tomoko Matsuda, Hikoyu Suzuki, Norichika Ogata
(Submitted on 20 Feb 2020 (v1), last revised 28 Feb 2020 (this version, v2))
文中結論說Viruses found outside China did not form a monophyletic clade, opposite to previous study.These results suggest the difficulty of implementing effective border measures against this virus.這個對不對呢?至少在美國是對的吧,堵住中國,並沒堵住病毒傳播。因為病毒不是僅僅在中國有,更不是源於中國。這個結論有了實踐支持。
那源於哪裡呢?分析了美日台中。誰的更古老?文章其實說的也很清楚Our phylogenies suggest that the 「Bat-SARS-like coronavirus」 (MG772933) and「BatCoV RaTG13」 are more closely related to samples included in the group TCC (美國組綠色)and TCT(日本組藍色) than samples included in the group CTC(中國組黃色).