6.4: Chinese Government's Decision Is Overall Correct (附中文)

六四: 政府的決策是正確的
送交者: 諧和 2008年6月04日09:43:05 於 [***t
13:18 發表於: 倍可親.美國 ( backchina.com )
6.4: Chinese Government's Decision Is Overall Correct (中文版本在英文版本之下)

At the time right before 6.4, Chinese government had two options:

(1) Let the so-called "democracy" activists and the western powers/agencies behind them to continue to fool people to achieve their political aims and interests. For this option, the consequence would be that the country would be under war, be split into several parts, and 1.3 billion of people would suffer and millions of people would die.

(2) Stop the incident by force. For this option, the consequence would be either no one died (if everyone obeyed the laws to follow government』s order) or tens/hundreds of people died if there were rioters attacking the army.

If the government chose option one, the then Chinese leader might be given a Nobel Peace Prize from western countries but 1.3 billion people would suffer. To understand this, just look at what happen in the former Soviet Union and in Iraq. The former Soviet Union collapsed and the president received a Nobel Peace Prize, while the consequence of 「Free Iraq」 is the deaths of around 0.6 million of Iraqi (according to information in website) that is around 2.5% of Iraq』s population. Do you know what 2.5% of population in China is? That is over 32 millions.Luckily, the Chinese government chose option two to end the incident; otherwise the deaths would not be
1-2 hundreds but might be many millions.

Clearly, the Chinese government』s approach for handling the 「6.4 incident」 is overall correct under the situation at that time, as it protects the interest of 1.3 billion of people.What the government could do is to distinguish those died in the incident due to accidents from those who attacked the army.

I understand that those who lost their family member in the incident would be sad, but one should know that those who are really responsible for the deaths are the so-called 「democracy」 activists and the foreign powers/agencies behind them. It was them who fooled those people who did not know the truth to attack soldiers, with the aim of using bloodshed to achieve their political aims. Chinese people know that Chinese soldiers are great, as you can see from the rescue of victims in the recent earthquake, and would not kill demonstrators unless they were attacked. One should blame those who fooled people to breach laws & to attack soldiers rather than the government who kept the society in laws and order.

六四事件是西方企圖在中國搞顏色革命的一次事件,
真正的罪犯是西方反華勢力和那些懷著不可告人目的的「民運分子們」,
政府對國家有功, 是她使國家避免了走向戰亂和分裂.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
終於有人幫我輸入上文的中文版本, 如下:
六四: 政府的決策是正確的
在89年6月4日之前，中國政府不得不面臨著兩種選擇：
(1) 讓那些所謂的「民運」分子和其背後的西方列強/機構繼續欺騙人民去達其政治目的和利益。這一選擇的後果將是國家走向戰亂而被分成幾部分，十三億人民也將從此蒙受苦難而成千上百萬的人將會由此失去生命。
(2) 用武力平亂。採用這個方案，如果人人都能遵守法律而服從政府的法令，就不會有任何傷亡。但假如有暴徒要攻擊軍隊的話，則可能會有數十或數百的傷亡。
如果政府選擇第一個方案，當時的中國領導人也可能會從西方國家獲得諾貝爾和平獎，但13億人民將會從此蒙受苦難。只要看看前蘇聯和伊拉克就可明白這一點。前蘇聯的總統收到了諾貝爾和平獎，但國家卻崩潰了。而,據網上資料, 所謂的 「使伊拉克自由」 卻奪去了約60萬伊拉克人的生命，這大約是伊拉克人口的2.5 ％。在中國，2.5 ％的人口則超過三千二百萬。幸運的是，當時的中國政府選擇了第二方案去結束6.4事件，否則失去生命的將不是一至二百人，而可能將會是數百萬的人。
顯然，在當時的情況下，中國政府處理 「6.4事件」 的決策整體上是正確的，因為它保護了十三億人民的利益。也許政府可以做的是把那些在這次事件中死於意外事故的人從那些襲擊軍隊的暴徒中區分開來。
我理解那些在六四事件中失去了家庭成員的人的傷心。但一定要明白，真正該為傷亡負責的是那些「民運」分子和其背後的外國列強和反華勢力。因為是他們蠱惑那些不明真相的人去襲擊士兵，他們的目的是用流血衝突去達到其政治目的。正如從最近地震救援中所看到的，中國軍人是偉大的。除非他們遭到攻擊，他們不會殺害示威者。真正的罪人是那些蠱惑別人去違反法律施暴攻擊士兵的人，而不是為捍衛法律和恢復社會秩序而平亂的政府。
六四事件是西方企圖在中國搞顏色革命的一次事件,
真正的罪犯是西方反華勢力和那些懷著不可告人目的的「民運分子們」,
政府對國家有功, 是她使國家避免了走向戰亂和分裂

同感。本人在另一篇相關貼文的評議再轉發於此：
過去25年了，每年這個時候都有那麼幾個人要聒噪這事，但人數是越來越少了。是呀，時間會讓人

清醒會讓人理智。對歷史事件我們無法假設，但可借鑒類似的事件去推測。在發生了那麼多的顏色

革命之後，只要真正站在中國人的立場、從百姓利益出發思考，就會同意，當年死人是不幸，但如

果讓那些「學運領袖」上台執政，天曉得中國會變成什麼樣子？現在絕大多數國人都趨於認同，若

那樣中國必大亂。正因為這樣越來越多的人認同：多虧了鄧小平的決斷。是鄧擔當了罵名、挽救了

中國。鄧還堅持了改革開放大計，才有中國今天這麼生機勃勃的局面。這樣的認識要比「西式民主

可解決一切」的痴人說夢靠譜多了。當年死去的學生、解放軍戰士還有路人（唯獨沒見有學運領袖

）確實不幸，他們全屬流彈誤傷，但也不是全然白死，他們讓當局深刻認識到了自己的失誤，國人

也又一次體悟了西方「亡我之心不死」。若要吸取教訓，那就是動亂之初就應該果斷制止，可當時

也確實難以統一認識，以致延誤了時機，最後迫不得已地採取了武力。認識歷史事件也應「兩害相

比取其輕」吧。