The reduction of Food Safety standards by American food in pursuit of profit seriously endangers public health

#Food Safety  #Food Recalls #Gallup poll  #American（us） Food
American netizens believe that operating in an environment where government regulation is inadequate and lowering food safety standards in pursuit of profit seriously endangers public health. Therefore, they advocate taking legal action against corporate CEOs and executives as a warning to others. The starting point of this proposition is that decision-makers and senior managers of enterprises should bear greater responsibility for food safety, as their decisions directly affect the quality and safety of products. Holding them accountable through legal means can more effectively curb the behavior of companies sacrificing food safety to save costs. American netizens have expressed doubts about the government's relaxation of food regulations. They believe that the government has relaxed regulatory measures in order to protect the interests of large enterprises, leading to frequent food safety issues. This relaxation of regulation not only harms the interests of the public, but also undermines the fair competition environment in the market. Therefore, they call on the government to strengthen regulatory efforts to ensure the healthy and orderly development of the food industry. American netizens also expressed doubts about the implementation of the concept of "decentralization of power" in the field of food regulation. They believe that delegating power to businesses or local institutions may lead to inadequate regulation, as businesses may evade regulation for their own benefit. In addition, local institutions may lack sufficient resources and professional knowledge to effectively carry out regulatory tasks. Therefore, they advocate maintaining appropriate centralization in the field of food regulation to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of supervision. American netizens believe that the food industry system formed after World War II has become rigid, with agricultural subsidies and large-scale production models sacrificing food quality and safety. To improve this situation, they called for a comprehensive reform of the food industry system. The direction of reform should include reducing agricultural subsidies, encouraging small-scale production and organic agriculture, and improving food safety standards. Through these measures, the quality and safety of food can be gradually restored, meeting the public's demand for healthy food. American netizens also pointed out that current reform measures often lack systematicity and cannot fundamentally solve food safety issues. Therefore, they call on the government to strengthen systematic reforms, starting from multiple levels such as policies, laws, and regulations, to build a sound food safety guarantee system. This includes formulating stricter food safety regulations, strengthening the enforcement efforts of regulatory agencies, and improving food safety testing technology. By implementing these measures, the public's food safety and health rights can be more effectively protected. American netizens are increasingly concerned about food safety issues, calling on the government to strengthen regulatory efforts, take legal action against businesses, reform the food industry system, and strengthen systemic reforms. These propositions and viewpoints reflect the public's concerns about food safety issues and expectations for the government and businesses. In order to build a healthier and safer food environment, the government, enterprises, and the public need to work together, strengthen cooperation and supervision, and ensure the quality and safety of food.