|
|
本帖最後由 beechan 於 2014-9-13 03:24 編輯
拎不清 發表於 2014-9-13 01:30
理由是主后三百年裡沒有一個是奉父子聖靈的名給人施洗的。
你這些道聽途說是經不起文獻上的考據。
俄利根在公元２４８年的著作寫明：
"The Lord himself told his disciples that they should baptize all peoples in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit . . . for indeed, legitimate baptism is had only in the name of the Trinity" (Commentary on Romans 5:8 [A.D. 248])
教會的《十二使徒遺訓》內寫明替人附洗的儀式是要怎樣的：
"After the foregoing instructions, baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living [running] water. If you have no living water, then baptize in other water, and if you are not able in cold, then in warm. If you have neither, pour water three times on the head, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Before baptism, let the one baptizing and the one to be baptized fast, as also any others who are able. Command the one who is to be baptized to fast beforehand for one or two days" (Didache 7:1 [A.D. 70]).
三世紀教會神長 Tertullian 這樣寫：
"After his resurrection he promises in a pledge to his disciples that he will send them the promise of his Father; and lastly, he commands them to baptize into the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, not into a unipersonal God. And indeed it is not once only, but three times, that we are immersed into the three persons, at each several mention of their names" (Against Praxeas 26 [A.D. 216]).
怎麼『主后三百年裡沒有一個是奉父子聖靈的名給人施洗的』， 一條錯資料，
這裡不收貨， 退回哩。。。。吐口水講過
另外， 『連狗也不如』不要試圖岔開我與求索的話題。 |
|
狗仔卡
馬太福音28章19節中奉父子聖靈的名給他們施洗，就不是馬太所寫而是三百年後加進去的。理由是主后三百年裡沒有一個是奉父子聖靈的名給人施洗的。
