Oct 26, 2015 at 11:15 PM
對中國最有偏見的,一是宗教系統,一是軍用系統 The US religious system military system is the most biased in China.
在美國有時一個新的技術出來,不到一年,法律規定要換這個新的設備,全國統一執行. 世界應該也是這樣子的. 美國製造業外移,所以小孩子都不願意學數學,工程師的平均質量低. 製造業多的地區是不是要開放實習就業機會?對世界各地的小孩子是不是每個人都應該有一個職業人生規劃,以你的大數據為每個孩子在世界各地工作獲取經歷創造條件,甚至幫找生活伴侶,婚姻家庭,養兒育女.或者把密度過高的地方人口,向人口密度低的地方分佈,可以向高居住水準的地方疏散. 有很多的父母善於工作,但不善於教育孩子. 現在很多的年輕人不願一生一世的婚姻. 是不是可以把養育孩子從父母責任里分出來, 多辦住宿學校. 讓人生比較動蕩的,性格不太安於現狀的,有經濟條件的,去追求他們自己的自由,同時又給孩子提供溫暖健康的環境,讓他們健康成長. 我小時候我爸爸在北京,我是從寄宿學校出來的,每星期回家看父母一次,我覺得在寄宿學校得到比一般學校更好的教育.
In the United States, sometimes a new technology comes out. In less than a year, the law stipulates that this new equipment should be replaced and implemented nationwide. The world should be like this. In US manufacturing industry is moving away, so children are not willing to learn mathematics, be engineers. The average educational quality is low. Is there a lot of manufacturing areas in the world to open internships? For every child around the world, should everyone beprepared a professional life plan, use your big data to create conditions for each child to work and get experience in the world, and even help find a life partner, marriage family, raising children. Or distribute the population with excessive density to a place with low population density, and evacuate to a place with high living standards. There are many parents who are good at work, but not good at educating children. Now many young people are not willing to live for a lifetime. Is it possible to separate the raising children from the parental responsibility and have more accommodation schools. Let those who』s life is more turbulent, the character is not very stable, have economic conditions, to pursue their own freedom, and at the same time provide the child with warm and healthy environment, let them grow up healthily. When I was a child, my father was in Beijing. I grew up from the boarding school. I went home to see my parents once a week. I felt that I was better educated in the boarding school than the general school.
以前建築都是要花好幾十年才建成,現在的技術可以幾天就建成,有些還可以移動. 對了我覺得有些東西是要提早規劃的,比如說通信行業裡邊的頻道的使用. 如果全球有一個很清晰的頻道使用規範,那我們所有的通訊工具就可以在任何地方使用. 還有我想以後空中的私人飛機和無人機也會多起來,是不是應該提早規定空中飛行的軌道,不然會有麻煩. 美軍每年有一部分預算是給小企業新興科技研發所用,最先進的科技在他們手裡. 有些前沿的科技可以改變整個的工業結構. 但是這些小企業沒有資金手段規模設計系統. 而系統的改變,既使用的是現成科技,好的系統設計也會有非常傑出的成果. 有什麼辦法可以跟他們合作嗎?從小單個體到大系統設計? 美國有兩種人是最頑固的,對中國最有偏見的,一是宗教系統的,一是軍用系統的. 應該多請他們來看看中國多交流.
In the past, buildings took decades to build. Now the technology can built it in a few days, and some can even be moved. Yes, I think there are some things to be planned early, such as the use of frequency channels in the communications industry. There is a clear channel usage specification in the world, then all our communication tools can be used anywhere. And I think there will be more private jets and drones in the air, should we prescribe the orbits of air flight early? Otherwise, there will be big troubles. US military has a part of the budget each year for small enterprises to develop new technology, and the most advanced technology is in their hands. Some cutting-edge technologies can change the entire industrial structure. But these small enterprises do not have the means of capital, scale, design of a system. When system changes, using existing off-the-shelf technology, a good system design will have very outstanding results. Is there any way to cooperate with them? From small single body to large system design? There are two kinds of people in the United States who are the most stubborn. They are the most biased against China. One is the religious system and the other is the military system. You should ask them to visit China to have more exchanges with China.