@RealdonaldTrump
Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn』t be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and 「TRUMP,」 will never be able to settle. The United States has spent $200 Billion Dollars more than Europe, and Europe』s money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back. Why didn』t Sleepy Joe Biden demand Equalization, in that this War is far more important to Europe than it is to us — We have a big, beautiful Ocean as separation. On top of this, Zelenskyy admits that half of the money we sent him is 「MISSING.」 He refuses to have Elections, is very low in Ukrainian Polls, and the only thing he was good at was playing Biden 「like a fiddle.」 A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left. In the meantime, we are successfully negotiating an end to the War with Russia, something all admit only 「TRUMP,」 and the Trump Administration, can do. Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring Peace, and Zelenskyy probably wants to keep the 「gravy train」 going. I love Ukraine, but Zelenskyy has done a terrible job, his Country is shattered, and MILLIONS have unnecessarily died – And so it continues…..
俺一如既往溫柔評論在他的賬號下:
Of course, the president has the power to express his personal views, but the president should not easily express seriously personal policy views, which will mislead the public.
There are several serious issues that need to be identified.
1. Which is more like a dictatorship, Ukraine or Russia?
2. Is Ukraine's main problem now the election or the defense of the homeland? Does the U.S. government have a satisfactory candidate for the leader of the new Ukrainian government? Then, will the United States continue to support the new Ukrainian government?
3. The United States showed $500 billion in aid to Ukraine, while Ukraine claimed to have received less than $100 billion. So in addition to reasonably suspecting that the Ukrainian government has corrupt figures, should USA find out as soon as possible how much of the money is possessed by corrupt people in the United States? After all, other federal departments in the United States have found more money than this and were embezzled by former government officials. Who can guarantee that the money to aid Ukraine was not privately taken away by people in the United States, but not really given to Ukraine?
4. If international principles must be followed, is it in line with the principle of national equality in the Charter of the United Nations that the president directly accuses the leaders of other sovereign countries and explicitly requires other countries to do what they must and cannot do?
Is it true that there is only one principle in the world that can ignore any principle and commitment as long as it is good for my own country? In this way, should the world return to the jungle era before 2000?
I fully support President Trump's domestic policy, but I basically don't agree with your international policy. It's too hasty and lack of strategic vision.
大致用Chatapp中文翻譯如下:
川普總統:
想一想,一位適度成功的喜劇演員Volodymyr Zelenskyy說服美利堅合眾國花費3500億美元,進入一場無法贏得的戰爭,這場戰爭永遠不必開始,但如果沒有美國和「特朗普」,他永遠無法解決這場戰爭。美國的支出比歐洲多2000億美元,歐洲的資金是有保障的,而美國將一無所獲。為什麼昏昏欲睡的喬·拜登不要求平等化,因為這場戰爭對歐洲來說比對我們重要得多——我們有一個大而美麗的海洋作為分離。除此之外,Zelenskyy承認,我們寄給他的一半錢「不在了」。他拒絕舉行選舉,在烏克蘭民意調查中很低,他唯一擅長的是扮演拜登「像小提琴一樣」。Zelenskyy是一個沒有選舉的獨裁者,最好快點行動,否則他就不會有一個國家了。與此同時,我們正在成功談判結束與俄羅斯的戰爭,這是所有人都承認的,只有「特朗普」和特朗普政府才能做到。拜登從未嘗試過,歐洲未能帶來和平,澤倫斯基可能想讓「肉汁列車」繼續下去。我愛烏克蘭,但Zelenskyy做得很糟糕,他的國家被擊碎了,數百萬人不必要地死亡——所以它還在繼續......
俺溫柔評論;
總統當然有權力發表個人的觀點,但總統不應該輕易發表嚴重個人化的政策性觀點,這樣做會誤導民眾。
有幾個嚴肅的問題需要確定.
1. 烏克蘭和俄羅斯哪一個更像獨裁國家?
2.烏克蘭現在的主要問題是選舉還是保衛國土?美國政府有滿意的烏克蘭新政府的領導者候選人嗎?然後,美國會繼續支持新烏克蘭政府嗎?
3.美國顯示援助$5,000億美元給烏克蘭,而烏克蘭則宣稱只收到不到$1,000億美元,那麼除了合理懷疑烏克蘭政府有貪污人物之外,是不是應該以最快速度查清這筆錢到底有多少被美國內部的貪污人物佔有了?畢竟美國其它聯邦部門查出了比這更多的錢,被以前政府官員貪污了,誰能保證以援助烏克蘭的錢不是被美國內部的人私下拿走了,而沒有真正給到烏克蘭呢?
4.如果國際原則是必須遵守的,那麼作為總統直接點名指責其它主權國家的領袖,並明確要求別國必須做什麼,又不能做什麼,這符合聯合國憲章中的國家平等原則嗎?
是不是世界上只需要一個原則,只要為我自己的國家好,就可以不顧任何原則和承諾?如此一來,世界是不是應該回到2000年以前的叢林時代?
我完全支持川普總統的國內政策,但我基本上不贊成你的國際政策,太草率而無戰略性眼光。