手機版 | 簡體版 | 發布廣告 |常用工具 | 網站地圖

登錄註冊找回密碼切換風格

我要發布

倍可親首頁 › 日誌 › 無民主 › 日誌

無民主

https://big5.backchina.com/?334680

讓巴維權少女出局

作者：無民主於 2013-9-29 06:20 發表於最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:所見所聞|通用分類:熱點雜談

關鍵詞：顧曉軍, 公正, 公正第一

轉載：

讓巴維權少女出局

　　　　－－顧曉軍主義：改變中國·之二千零六十七

　　把《只有鐵腕反腐》發在雅典學園，一叫追真求恆的網友又來跟貼與我繞。其實，我能理解他們－－我被中共意識形態與政法委及所謂的知識精英們合夥封殺，結果是越封殺名氣越大；所以，他們總想與我過過招，好向其他人炫耀。

　　別說是一般的網友如此，就連入門、做了我弟子的石三生、不也在文章中說過、半文盲覺得他的文章、比我寫得好嗎？

　　誰的文章更好，在其次；這半文盲論文章好壞，能作數嗎？是不是？

　　《只有鐵腕反腐》，是針對《習近平「打老虎」或逼局勢突變……》寫的，網友紅塵是我的一句話、更乾脆－－「從古到今沒有一個貪污分子和腐敗集團敢造反的」，是這個道理吧？

　　世上的道理，往往被這樣或那樣的原因扭曲了。比如，「維權」是自由世界向專制國家輸出的概念。那麼，自由世界是不是應該考慮專制國家的具體情況呢？

　　應該。但美國精英們沒有考慮。他們只知道「保護對少數失去公民權者的侵蝕」（請參考美國《外交政策》之《怎樣將民主帶到中國》作者：黃亞生），而忘記了在專制體制內大多數人的公民權都被侵蝕了。

　　因此，在這樣的情況下，「保護對少數失去公民權者的侵蝕」沒有意義。你美國精英們樹的「維權」典型陳光誠，與中共樹的好人典型雷鋒，有什麼兩樣？甚至，還不如！雷鋒做好事，還總有人授益；陳光誠出名、發財，與中國普通老百姓又有什麼關係呢？

　　黃亞生在《怎樣將民主帶到中國》中已經說了「即使最具批判性的北京知識分子也承認，陳光誠和其他異議分子的想法在中國13億中只能得到微乎其微的回應」，可自以為是的西方精英們，又打造出了「巴基斯坦維權少女馬拉拉」。

　　這西方精英們打造的馬拉拉，與中共打造的張海迪有何區別？張海迪是「身殘志堅」，馬拉拉是「塔利班槍口下待放的花蕾」－－張海迪高位截癱卻能開車，馬拉拉是「待放的花蕾」卻已獲「國家和平獎」。

　　都已獲「國家和平獎」了，還是什麼「待放的花蕾」呢？這不分明是在做戲？其實，在顧粉團向美國《外交政策》推薦「全球百位思想家」、向美國《時代周刊》推薦「年度風雲人物」，而《時代周刊》甩掉所有中國人、推出「巴維權少女」時，我已明白：中共意識形態與政法委及所謂的知識精英們，已與西方精英們聯繫好了－－打造一個弱女子的形象，從而封殺顧曉軍、封殺「公正第一」。

　　證明：CIBN《塔利班槍口下待放的花蕾：巴基斯坦維權少女馬拉拉》「國際在線報道：一個花季少女卻擁有成為政治家的遠大理想」。理想也能說事嗎？如果一孩子想當總統咋辦呢？

　　再證：香港中國通訊社的《巴維權少女被提名為諾貝爾和平獎候選人》。諾獎評委會不是明確提名均有50年的保密期的嗎？怎麼可以這樣不守信用、這麼造勢呢？是不是中西方的精英們，看到顧粉團的《向諾貝爾和平獎推薦顧曉軍(專題/中英文/更新中)》的氣勢著急了？想一步到位、既成事實？

　　可精英們卻忘了：顧曉軍的「公正是第一價值觀」已構成思想體系，而馬拉拉只有「成為政治家的遠大理想」。你們雖可捧紅一少女、把她捧成和平獎的獲得者，但是，你們將背上阻礙人類思想發展的罵名。顧粉團會記錄下這一切，並告訴這個世界的後人。除非遵守諾言－－讓巴維權少女出局。

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　顧曉軍 2013-2-1 南京

Let Pakistani human rights girl out

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's two thousand and sixty-seven

Translator: God has eyes

Hair "iron-fisted anti-corruption" at the Athens

Academy, called chase really seeking constant of

friends came abreast of me around. In fact, I can

understand them - I was the Communist

ideology and the Politics and Law Committee,

and the so-called intellectual elite partner

blocked, the result is more blocked fame the

greater; Therefore, they always want to exchange

blows with me, good to show off to other people.

Not to mention so general users, even the entry-

do my disciples Dan Sansheng, and not also the

article said, semiliterate feel his article, I write

you?

Who better article, followed; This semiliterate

theory article is good or bad, can be operands

do? Is not it?

"Only an iron hand, anti-corruption, Xi Jinping

tigers" or mutation to force the situation ...

"written by friends Red Dust is my sentence,

more simply -" Since ancient times no one dared

to corruption of molecules and corruption Group

rebel "and the truth, right?

The truth of the world, tend to be this or that

reason distorted. For example, the "rights" is the

output of the concept of the free world to the

authoritarian state. The free world should

consider the specific circumstances of the

authoritarian state it?

Should. American elites are not considered. They

only know the "erosion protection of the minority

who lost citizenship" (please refer to United

States foreign policy, "" How to bring democracy

to China ": Yasheng Huang), and forget the

authoritarian regime within most people's

citizenship erosion a.

Accordingly, in such a case, the "protection"

meaningless minority erosion lost citizenship.

Typical American elites tree "rights" Chen

Guangcheng, and the good people of the

Chinese Communist Party tree typical Lei Feng,

What is different? Even not as good! Does good

things, but also the total was granted benefits;

Chen Guangcheng famous, fortune, and the

ordinary people in China what to do with it?

Yasheng Huang, "how to bring democracy to

China" has said "even if the most critical

intellectuals also admitted that the idea Chenof ??

and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion can

only get a minimal response, self-righteous

Western elites, but also to create a the the

"Pakistan defenders girl malala".

Western elites to build malala, with the Chinese

Communists build Zhang Haidi What's the

difference? Zhang Haidi, "waist", malala "to be

put under the Taliban muzzle bud" - Zhang

Haidi paraplegia was able to drive, malala be

put the bud "has been" the National Peace Prize

Have been approved by the State Peace Prize, "to

be put the bud"? This is clearly not in a show?

In fact, in the care of the dough to the United

States' foreign policy "recommend" one hundred

global thinkers ", recommended to the United

States," the Times "Person of the Year", while

the "Times" to get rid of all the Chinese people,

launched Bavi the right girl " , I have to

understand: Ideology and Politics and Law

Committee of Communist China, and the so-

called intellectual elite who have contact with

the Western elites - and to create the image of a

weak woman, which blocked Gu Xiaojun ban "the

public impartiality".

Proof: the CIBN to be put under the Taliban

muzzle bud: Pakistani human rights activists the

girls malala "International Online reports: a

young girl, but has become the lofty ideals of

the politicians". Ideal can say things? If a child

wanted to be president supposed to do?

The card: Hong Kong China News Agency "Bavi

the right girl to be nominated for the Nobel

Peace Prize. Nobel jury is not clear the

nomination have confidentiality period of 50

years.? How can such bad faith, such a

campaign? Is not in the Western elites, see Gu

dough "Gu Xiaojun (thematic / English / update)

" momentum anxious to recommend to the Nobel

Peace Prize? One step, a fait accompli?

Elites forget: Gu Xiaojun of "the public

impartiality is the first values" constitutes a

system of thought, rather malala only "lofty

ideals become politicians. You can, although

helped popularize a girl, her name into the

Peace Prize winner, however, you will bear the

infamy hinder the development of human

thought. Gu dough will record all of this, and

tell the world to future generations. Keep their

promises - Bavi the right girl out.

Gu Xiaojun 2013-2-1 Nanjing

高興

感動

同情

搞笑

難過

拍磚

支持

鮮花

收藏分享邀請舉報

評論 (0 個評論)

無民主最受歡迎的博文

熱點新聞>> 更多

>> 更多

其它[熱點雜談]博文更多

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-7-13 09:49

返回頂部