面對歐洲難民大潮,歐洲人還一下拉不下情面,只有美國,赤膊上陣,挺身一呼,亮出了西方人的廬山真面目。紐約時報發表一系列文章,不僅僅是挑明了反難民,而且還指明了該怎麼反 --
非法難民必須遣返,他們的母國不接受怎麼辦?給他們施加壓力迫使他們接受。 那麼無證難民怎麼辦?要哪個國家接受?關集中營!關起來只有返回本國所在地才能夠出來。這樣關不了多久,他們就自動回去了。
夠狠,夠聰明不是嗎?到底是曾經滅了印第安人族的美國人啊。
且慢歡呼高興 -- 怎麼這種做法聽起來很熟呀?不是就在最近,現在仍然在進行,美國就在跟中國政府施加壓力要中國政府接受4萬美國的中國非法移民?那麼接下來要把來自中國的無證難民關集中營關到他們自己要走,就完全是個看正確的時間,正確的地點的策略問題了?等到美國跟中國之間發生了什麼大事件,比如戰爭,就跟德國科隆新年夜性侵事件一樣,那時候豈不是到了?
唉,可笑昨日反穆的那番轟轟烈烈!
Can Germany Be Honest About Its Refugee Problems?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/16/opinion/can-germany-be-honest-about-its-refugee-problems.html Finally, we have to be willing to intern those who arrive without passports. This sounds harsh, but it is appropriate. People who cross the border without ID must be prevented from roaming freely within Germany. Once in semi-custody (meaning that you cannot get into Germany, but you』re free to go home), it wouldn』t take long to determine where they came from, and why.
The idea isn』t new: Special sites for people from the Balkans who filed mostly pointless asylum requests after the fighting there were set up in Bavaria. This has reduced the influx from these countries considerably.