倍可親

跟梁警官最相似的意外走火打死人案,警察被大陪審團免於起訴

作者:fighter8  於 2015-2-17 08:29 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

通用分類:熱點雜談|已有7評論

關鍵詞:陪審團, 巡邏

好消息,剛才看到有人已經舉例紐約警察2004年跟梁警官最相似的意外走火打死人案,警察被大陪審團免於起訴。那個白人警察在政府房的房頂上巡邏,跟梁警官一樣拿著槍,手指放在扳機上,當他正打開通往樓井的門時,一個人突然推門而入,他嚇一跳而走火打死此人。大陪審團認為這是一個意外而免於起訴。

 

梁警官的槍擊更意外,是從牆上彈射過去打死格里的。兩個案子比較可見,梁警官完全是被當了黑白衝突的替罪羊,因為政治原因被起訴的。如果那個警察都無罪,為什麼梁警官要有罪?這是最好的case law,梁警官可以據此辯護。

 

The shooting of Timothy Stansbury occurred in New York City on January 24, 2004. Stansbury was an unarmed 19-year-old New York City man who was shot and killed by New York Police Department Officer Richard S. Neri Jr. on January 24, 2004. Officer Neri and a partner were patrolling the rooftop of a housing project in the Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn at about 1 a.m. Officer Neri, with his gun drawn, approached a rooftop door to check the stairway inside. Neri testified to a Brooklyn grand jury that he fired his standard Glock 19 pistol unintentionally when he was startled as Stansbury pushed open the rooftop door. Stansbury, a resident of an adjoining building, died from one shot in the chest. The grand jury found the shooting to be accidental.[1]

 

On February 17, 2004 after nearly a month of investigation, the grand jury declined to indict Officer Neri on charges of criminally negligent homicide and manslaughter, finding instead the shooting to be accidental. Mayor Mike Bloomberg who like Kelly had not been overtly supportive of Officer Neri said: Although the death of Timothy Stansbury was a heartbreaking tragedy, a grand jury today decided that Officer Neri's actions were not criminal. The Police Department will conduct a review of the case to determine the appropriate course of action."[5]

1

高興

感動

同情

搞笑

難過

拍磚
1

支持
4

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (6 人)

發表評論 評論 (7 個評論)

回復 fanlaifuqu 2015-2-17 08:33
很有力!
回復 fighter8 2015-2-17 08:42
還有好消息,亞裔警察協會出面發表聲明支持梁警官了。看看他們的發言,華人可以借鑒:

Gene Canapi, the president of the Asian Jade Society of police officers, said the society was 「disappointed」 with Liang』s indictment. 「The Society hopes that the previous negative interaction and rhetoric between the police and the community does not impact the outcome of PO Liang』s trial,」 he said in a statement.


又一條好消息:原來梁警官跟同伴當時都沒有意識到子彈打死人了,只知道梁槍走火,所以沒有及時救援格里。本來也是,梁那樣意外走火,自己根本就沒有瞄準任何人,所以他都不知道子彈打到哪裡去了,誰會想到它會彈射出去打死人?那樣的機會比中lottery 還小。這就解釋了那4分鐘沒有救援的問題,說明根本不是有意不救,而是沒有意識到。也是一個意外。

這個案子如果被判有罪了,我們華人今後怎麼做人。
回復 fighter8 2015-2-17 08:59
[回復] [回信給作者] [本篇全文] [本討論區] [修改] [刪除] [轉寄] [轉貼] [收藏] [舉報]                 [ 33 ]

發信人: fighter644 (武士), 信區: Military
標  題: Re: 從我的類似經驗可知,陪審團裁決是梁警官唯一的希望
發信站: BBS BBS (Mon Feb 16 19:48:46 2015, 美東)

壞消息:

梁警官的律師將要決定是否使用陪審團,還是法官判案。原來果然是律師在掌控。律師
還解釋了為什麼梁沒有去大陪審團作證,說是沒有用。我相信他絕對要決定用法官判案。

他的第一個決定已經給梁帶來不可挽回的損失。第二個更不用說。梁警官有權自己做決
定,如果律師不同意可以即刻解僱他。當時我就是為此解僱了我的白人律師的。如果不
能把這個決定權拿回來,梁警官絕對要輸。

Worth』s next key decision may be whether to try the case before a jury or a
judge, as is usually the case with fatal police shootings. That decision
could involve more racial politics. That judge would be Danny Chun, a Korean
American, who presided at Liang』s arraignment and who would be under
enormous pressure from both black and Asian activists.

以上消息都來自於一篇文章:http://nypdconfidential.com/print/2015p/150216p.html
回復 fighter8 2015-2-17 09:00
美國的陪審團制度想必也跟加拿大一樣,控方和辯方有同等權利挑選陪審團員。
好像是要雙方同意的。只要梁堅持美國關於陪審團成員的原則,即陪審團構成要反映布
魯克林的人口構成,就贏了。因為我看了一下,布魯克林黑人人口才35%,白人34%,其
他華人亞裔也不少。三分之一的黑人,可以肯定根本判不了梁有罪,因為其他三分之二
的非黑人可以肯定大部分都不會認為梁有罪。如果不能達成一致,也會產生陪審團宣告
解散,沒有結論。

這個案子搞好了會徹底贏。
回復 whyuask 2015-2-17 16:59
也許正因為律師知道有這個案例,所以才決定直接讓法官判案。沒必要把律師想成惡人。
回復 我愛月季 2015-2-21 10:49
因為那個警官是白人。
回復 newyorker92 2015-2-26 11:31
相信該律師能替梁警官逃回公道!

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-4-25 09:47

返回頂部