倍可親

冤案竣工,這就是美國!

作者:Cannaa  於 2017-11-2 06:25 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:真人真事|通用分類:法律相關|已有2評論

關鍵詞:趙維武

趙維武沒有律師,不懂英語,法庭上趙一說話就被法官打斷。判決完全是一面之辭。
這個記者也是誤導,根本沒有13個錄像,那時別的不相干的事扯到一起。

76歲老人會用電驢下載錄像,荒唐!
Easton man convicted in rare child pornography trial
Of The Morning Call

After a rare trial where jurors viewed the videos of child sexual abuse that an Easton man was accused of downloading and sharing, the panel convicted him Wednesday on all counts after only 45 minutes of deliberation.

Weiwu Zhao, 76, was convicted of four offenses including a second-degree felony count of distributing images depicting indecent contact with children younger than 13. That means Zhao faces a maximum sentence of 29 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled Dec. 18.

Zhao was charged after investigators said they tracked a three-minute, 22-second video to Zhao』s computer, and later used a search warrant to seize the device from his West Madison Street home. A forensic analysis of the hard drive uncovered 13 other videos, police said.

Northampton County Assistant District Attorney Laura Majewski said the verdict brings justice for each of the victims whose abuse was depicted in the videos.

「It』s important for the public to understand this is not a victimless crime and each of those victims now has a voice because he has been brought to justice,」 Majewski said.

While child pornography is a major target for law enforcement, very few cases go to trial and most end with a guilty plea if the evidence is not thrown out because of errors by investigators.

In Zhao』s trial, jurors saw parts of the 14 videos, which moved some to tears. Judge Jennifer Sletvold warned jurors after seeing the videos not to allow their emotions to prejudice them against Zhao.

Zhao represented himself at trial, having hired and fired three lawyers as his case wound through court. A native of China who relied on an interpreter during the trial, Zhao railed against the justice system in legal filings, claiming he is being framed and invoking racism against Asians.



高興

感動

同情
1

搞笑

難過

拍磚

支持

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (1 人)

發表評論 評論 (2 個評論)

回復 笑臉書生 2017-11-5 05:17
在法庭上,必須聽法官的,這是法律基本上常識,打斷律師,陪審員,甚至於罪犯的發言,扯不上非法,無理,而是正當的執法行為!趙先生為什麼沒辯護律師,因為他辭退了三個「不合格」的律師,法官不許另找是對的,因趙先生作法近似無賴,三個律師都不合格嗎?
回復 笑臉書生 2017-11-5 05:22
要相信美國法律一相信美國法官,要相信陪審團正確判斷,如何這一切都不相信,那我們能相信什麼?

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2020-2-29 04:49

返回頂部