倍可親

針灸:有效還是假象?

作者:十三大爺  於 2010-4-25 10:18 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

通用分類:網路文摘|已有27評論

關鍵詞:

現代的科技發展太快了,即使是學過中醫的人也不見得了解現今對中醫,氣功和針灸的基礎理論研究。這是我為什麼推薦大家常讀維基百科的原因。
針灸
維基百科,自由的百科全書
跳轉到: 導航, 搜 索

中醫學
太極圖
中醫理論
- 陰陽 - 五行
臟腑 - 經絡
望聞問切 - 辨證論治
四氣五味 - 君臣佐使
治療方法
中藥 - 針灸 - 推 拿
導引 - 氣功
中醫經典
黃帝內經 - 神農本草經
難經 - 傷寒雜病論
基礎學科
中醫基礎理論
中醫診斷學
中藥學 - 方劑學
溫病學 - 針灸學
中醫史 - 各家學說
臨床學科
中醫內科 - 中醫外科
中醫婦科 - 中醫兒科
針灸科 - 骨傷科
中醫眼科-中醫耳鼻喉科
民間療法
推拿 - 刮痧
其它
中醫學家列表
祝由十三科 - 馬醫科

針灸[1]是 在中醫學中採用刺或火人體穴位來治療疾病的 方法。針由遠古時代的骨針石砭開始發展到長短、大小、式樣、材料、方法各不相同的針具,如電針、磁針、水針 等;灸偏向於傳統的艾灸,有艾絨灸艾條灸等,現代醫學中採用紅外線照射也有類似作用。現代使用的針灸多是鋼針,而在古代多使用的是銀針, 其功效要比鋼針好。

相傳伏羲氏九針。為九種針具的總稱。出《黃帝內經》。即鑱針、員針、鍉針、鋒針、鈹針、員利針、毫針、長針和大針。《靈樞·官針》:「九針之宜,各有所為; 長短大小,各有所施也,不得其用,病弗能移。」指出九針的形狀、用途各異,據情選用,方可去病。

針與灸是治療方法的兩個方面,多用針法來治療急性病,用灸法來治療慢性病。中醫學中針灸治療的理論基礎在於傳統的中醫臟腑陰陽經絡學說。和中醫的方劑治 療方法相比較,針灸治療的特點是療效快、簡單、便宜。

目錄 [隱藏]
// [編輯] 歷史

針灸起源於中國,具有悠久的歷史。針刺法萌發於新石器時代,當人們發生某些病痛或不適的時候,不自覺地用手按摩、捶拍,以至 用尖銳的石器按壓疼痛不適的部位,而使原有的癥狀減輕或消失,最早的針具:砭石也之而生,隨著古人智慧和社會生產力的不斷發展,針具逐漸發展成青銅針、鐵 針、金針、銀針,直到現在用的不鏽鋼針。相傳,華夏文明的始祖伏羲中醫針灸的發明人。伏羲氏不僅畫八卦, 結繩為網,教民田獵,而且「嘗百葯而制九針」(東漢皇甫謐記載於《帝王世紀》)、「嘗草制砭」(南宋羅泌記 載於《路 史》)。砭就是砭石,即華夏民 族最早的針灸。灸法的起源與為的發現和使用有著密切的關係,當身體有某種不適時,用以去烘烤得以減輕,繼而用各種樹枝作為施灸工具,逐漸發展到艾灸。

針灸治療方法是在漫長的歷史過程中形成的,其學術思想也隨著臨床醫學經驗的積累漸漸完善。1973年長沙馬王堆三號墓出土的醫學帛書中有《足臂十一脈灸經》和《陰陽十一脈灸經》,論述了十一條脈的循行分佈、病候表現和灸法治療等, 已形成了完整的經絡系統。《黃帝內經》是現存的中醫文獻中最早而且完整的中醫經典著作,已經形成了完整的經絡系統,即有十二經脈、十五絡脈、十 二經筋、十二經別以及與經脈系統相關的標本、根結、氣街、四海等,並對腧穴、針灸方法、針刺適應症和禁忌症等也做了詳細的論述,尤其是《靈樞經》所記載的針灸理論更為豐富而系統,所以《靈樞》是針灸學術的第一次總 結,其主要內容至今仍是針灸濱核心內容,故《靈樞》稱為《針經》。繼《內經》之後,戰國時代的神醫扁鵲所 著《難經》對針灸學說進行了補充和完善。

晉代醫學家皇甫謐潛心鑽研《內經》等著作,撰寫成《針灸甲乙經》,書中全面論述了臟腑經絡學說,發展並確定了349個穴 位,並對其位置、主治、操作進行了論述,同時介紹了針灸方法及常見病的治療,是針灸學術的第二次總結。

時期,隨著經濟文化的 繁榮昌盛,針灸學術也有很大的發展,唐代醫學家孫思邈在其著作《備急千金要方》中繪製了彩色的"明堂三人圖",並提出阿是穴的取法及應用。到了宋代,著名針灸學家王惟一編撰了《銅人腧穴針灸圖經》,考證了354個腧穴,並將全書刻於石碑上供學習 者參抄拓印,他還鑄造了2具銅人模型,外刻經絡腧穴,內置臟腑,作為針灸教學的直觀教具和考核針灸醫生之用,促進了針灸學術的發展。

元代滑伯仁所者的《十四經發揮》,首次將十二經脈與任、督二脈合稱為十四經脈,對後人研究經脈 很有裨益。

明代是針灸學術發展的鼎盛時期,名醫輩出,針灸理論研究逐漸深化,也出現了大量的針灸專著,如《針灸大全》、《針灸聚英》、《針灸四書》,特別是楊繼洲所著的《針灸大成》,彙集了明以前的針灸著作,總結了臨床經驗,內容豐富,是後世學習 針灸的重要參考書,是針灸學術的第三次總結。

清初至民國時期,雖然針灸醫學由興盛逐漸走向衰退,但由於針灸深得民心,故仍有《針灸逢源》等著作流傳下來。

中華人民共和國成立50年以來,以繼承為基礎,結合現代醫家的臨床經驗和科研成果,出版了大量的針灸學術專著 和論文,還成立了中國針灸學會,學術交流十分活躍,首創"針刺麻醉"。針灸的研究也從單一的文獻整理髮展到對其治病的臨床療效進行系統 的觀察,結合現代生理學、解剖學、組織學、生化學、免疫學、分子生物學等學科進行針灸治療的機理探討,取得了可喜的成就。

針灸學雖源於中國,但早在公元6世紀就傳到了朝鮮日本等 國。近年來,隨著中外文化交流的不斷深入,針灸也隨之傳到世界各地。為了加速針灸醫學的廣泛傳播,在中國北京上海南京設立了三大國際針灸培訓中心,以培養世界各地的針灸人才。1987年成立了世界針灸學會聯合會(簡稱"世界針聯"),推動了針灸事業的不斷發 展。

針灸灸療法包括針刺和灸灼兩種不同的治療方法。針刺法也稱針治法,是運用一定的操作手法,把金屬製成的、形體細長而尖的針刺入人體的某一固定的部位 (穴位),使接受針刺才發生酸、麻、脹、重等感覺,從而產生治療疾病的作用。灸灼法也稱為灸治法,是將艾 絨揉成小團或長條狀,點燃後放在(或靠近)人體體表的某些固定的部位,施行熱熨或熏,從現時達到治療疾病的目的。

中國宋代的銅人,上有穴位標註。
[編輯] 原理

中醫學認為,人體中的經絡系統負責輸送全身的「氣」、「血」及「津液」,這些輸送物質在體內循環,使身體中的各個組織與器官保持平衡與穩定。然而當 經絡系統出現阻塞不通的情況時,則影響了這些物質的輸送,使「邪氣」(各種產生病變的因子)侵入,此時人體就會開始出現異常病變。當針灸的針插進人體之 后,會引起人體自身的反應,加強氣血循環,克服經絡的阻塞,使經絡系統恢復正常,病症因此得以治癒。

[編輯] 對針灸的質疑

對於針灸的質疑,主要是因為針灸的理論基礎源於中醫學,與現代醫學的思維模式相距甚大。中國科學界對於針灸的研究已經有半個世紀,特別是針刺麻醉或者針刺止痛原理的研究,居於世界前列。但是近年來西方對於針灸研究的投入正在不斷加大[來源請求]

世界衛生組織(WHO)在1979年所出版的刊物中認可針灸在某些癥狀中有治療作用[2]。Cochrane Collaboration的科學家認為針灸對戒煙、氣喘、抗類風濕關節炎、頭疼等問題沒有效用。2007年9月《內醫檔案》雜誌刊登,德國雷根斯堡大學邁克爾·哈克博士主持的實驗使用1162名腰痛病患分3組分別進行針灸、假針灸和常規治療對比試驗。發現腰痛情況好轉的人,針灸組有47.6%,假針灸 組有44.2%,常規治療組有27.4%。針灸組和假針灸組沒有統計學意義的差別。[3][4]2009 年西雅圖的一個研究小組主持的研究表明,對長期腰疼患者,針灸和假針的治療效果都比傳統方法好,但是針灸和假針的療效沒有顯著差異。[5]

世界衛生組織在2003年發表了《Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials》,認為有對照試驗證實針灸可 有效治療若干疾病、癥狀或狀態,針灸對於另外一些病症的療效尚需要更多證據確認,同文又列出了療效未有足夠證據支持,但是可嘗試針灸的一些病症。[6]

根據2002年一項全國性調查的結果,全美有八百二十萬成年人曾經使用過針灸,有二百一十萬人曾在過去一年內進行過針灸。[7]

美國國立衛生研究院(NIH)下屬十七個研究所或中心,其中有美國國立替代與補充醫學中心(NCCAM),專門從事研究 包括中醫、針灸在內的「非西方主流醫學」,其中針灸是研究的熱門之一,不僅NCCAM對其有很多的立項,其它院所,比如美國 國立癌 症研究所也有很多投入。應用循證醫學的方法,多中心、多盲法進行臨床研究。[來源請求]1997年NIH的一份報告指出:臨床前研究 記錄了針灸在某些疾病治療方面有一些效果,但同時在一些其他研究中沒有效果。[8]

[編輯] 美國的針灸界

美國目前有大約3萬多名執照針灸師(有的州稱為針灸醫師或東方醫學醫師),5千多名應用針灸的西醫師。美 國有嚴格的針灸執照考試製度,要求考試申請人在美國高教部認可的針灸或中醫學校學習針灸的相關課程1700到4000學時。[9]

[編輯] 註釋
  1. ^ 拼音zhēn jiǔ,注音ㄓㄣ¯ ㄐ一ㄡˇ
  2. ^ Bannerman RH. 1979 「針灸:世界衛生組織的看法」世界衛生組織(英文)
  3. ^ 哪裡來的穴位?哪裡來的經絡?快看德國最新研究報告
  4. ^ 德實驗發現:中醫針灸治療腰痛比物理治療更有效,廣州日報
  5. ^ Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009;169[9]:858–866.
  6. ^ Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials,第23-26頁。(非pdf版見[1]
  7. ^ http://nccam.nih.gov/health/acupuncture/introduction.htm
  8. ^ [2])
  9. ^ 請參看www.nccaom.org.

高興

感動

同情

搞笑

難過

拍磚

支持

鮮花

發表評論 評論 (27 個評論)

回復 ww_719 2010-4-25 10:33
在加州,看針灸是保險是cover的,而且,我去看的一個美國醫生群組裡,有專門的針灸醫生,美國醫生在我得到他的治療后,會建議我去試他們group里的針灸...如果都沒效果,那為什麼加州保險cover這個,為什麼美國醫生群里建議去做針灸呢?哈哈哈..
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-25 11:09
ww_719: 在加州,看針灸是保險是cover的,而且,我去看的一個美國醫生群組裡,有專門的針灸醫生,美國醫生在我得到他的治療后,會建議我去試他們group里的針灸...如果都沒效果
我懶得翻譯了-來自維基百科英文板,請自己讀完。總而言之:針灸只屬於替代醫學。國家健康屬NIH和美國醫生協會AMA都提出了針灸的適應症。最主要的適應症是疼痛。從我貼的那段,你看懂了「假針」在穴位可以提供在近乎針灸同樣的鎮疼效果嗎?有一種學說:皮下近於穴位的針刺會釋放nitric oxide有抑制疼痛的作用。Bottom line: 針灸沒有說的那麼神,僅僅屬於替代醫學,而且適應症有限。

Evidence-based medicine

There is scientific agreement that an evidence-based medicine (EBM) framework should be used to assess health outcomes and that systematic reviews with strict protocols are essential. Organizations such as the Cochrane Collaboration and Bandolier publish such reviews. In practice, EBM is "about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence" and thus does not demand that doctors ignore research outside its "top-tier" criteria.[80]

The development of the evidence base for acupuncture was summarized in a review by researcher Edzard Ernst and colleagues in 2007. They compared systematic reviews conducted (with similar methodology) in 2000 and 2005:

    The effectiveness of acupuncture remains a controversial issue. ... The results indicate that the evidence base has increased for 13 of the 26 conditions included in this comparison. For 7 indications it has become more positive (i.e. favoring acupuncture) and for 6 it had changed in the opposite direction. It is concluded, that acupuncture research is active. The emerging clinical evidence seems to imply that acupuncture is effective for some but not all conditions.[8]

For acute low back pain there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against either acupuncture or dry needling, though for chronic low back pain acupuncture is more effective than sham treatment but no more effective than conventional and alternative treatments for short-term pain relief and improving function. However, when combined with other conventional therapies, the combination is slightly better than conventional therapy alone.[15][81] A review for the American Pain Society/American College of Physicians found fair evidence that acupuncture is effective for chronic low back pain.[82]

There are both positive[83] and negative[84] reviews regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture when combined with in vitro fertilisation.

A Cochrane Review concluded that acupuncture was effective in reducing the risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting with minimal side effects, though it was less than or equal to the effectiveness of preventive antiemetic medications.[16] A 2006 review initially concluded that acupuncture appeared to be more effective than antiemetic drugs, but the authors subsequently retracted this conclusion due to a publication bias in Asian countries that had skewed their results; their ultimate conclusion was in line with the Cochrane Review - acupuncture was approximately equal to, but not better than preventive antiemetic drugs in treating nausea.[85] Another Cochrane Review concluded that electroacupuncture can be helpful in the treatment of vomiting after the start of chemotherapy, but more trials were needed to test their effectiveness versus modern antivomiting medication.[86]

There is moderate evidence that for neck pain, acupuncture is more likely to be effective than sham treatment and offers short-term improvement compared to those on a waiting list.[87]

There is evidence to support the use of acupuncture to treat headaches that are idiopathic, though the evidence is not conclusive and more studies need to be conducted.[88] Several trials have indicated that migraine patients benefit from acupuncture, although the correct placement of needles seems to be less relevant than is usually thought by acupuncturists. Overall in these trials acupuncture was associated with slightly better outcomes and fewer adverse effects than prophylactic drug treatment.[89]

There is conflicting evidence that acupuncture may be useful for osteoarthritis of the knee, with both positive,[90][91] and negative[92] results. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International released a set of consensus recommendations in 2008 that concluded acupuncture may be useful for treating the symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee.[93]

A systematic review of the best five randomized controlled trials available concluded there was insufficient evidence to support the use of acupuncture in the treatment of the symptoms of fibromyalgia.[94]

For the following conditions, the Cochrane Collaboration has concluded there is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is beneficial, often because of the paucity and poor quality of the research, and that further research is needed:

    * Chronic asthma[95]
    * Bell's palsy[96]
    * Cocaine dependence[97]
    * Depression[98]
    * Primary dysmenorrhoea (incorporating TENS [99]
    * Epilepsy[100]

       

    * Glaucoma[101]
    * Insomnia[102]
    * Irritable bowel syndrome[103]
    * Induction of childbirth[104]
    * Rheumatoid arthritis[105]
    * Shoulder pain[106]

       

    * Schizophrenia[107]
    * Smoking cessation[108]
    * Acute stroke[109]
    * Stroke rehabilitation[110]
    * Tennis elbow[111]
    * Vascular dementia[112]

Positive results from some studies on the efficacy of acupuncture may be as a result of poorly designed studies or publication bias.[113][114] Edzard Ernst and Simon Singh state that as the quality of experimental tests of acupuncture have increased over the course of several decades (through better blinding, the use of sham needling as a form of placebo control, etc.) the results have demonstrated less and less evidence that acupuncture is better than placebo at treating most conditions.[115]
[edit] Neuroimaging studies

A 2005 literature review examining the use of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography to document the brainwave activity caused by acupuncture[116] concluded that neuroimaging data to date show some promise for being able to distinguish the cortical effects of expectation, placebo, and real acupuncture. The studies reviewed were mostly small and pain-related, and more research is needed to determine the specificity of neural substrate activation in non-painful indications.
[edit] NIH consensus statement

In 1997, the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a consensus statement on acupuncture that concluded that despite research on acupuncture being difficult to conduct, there is sufficient evidence to expand its use and encourage further studies of the phenomenon. The statement was not a policy statement of the NIH but is the considered assessment of a panel convened by the NIH. The consensus group also noted the relative safety of acupuncture compared to certain other medical interventions. They stated that deciding when to use it in clinical practice depends on multiple factors, including the experience of the clinician, the information available on the treatment, and the individual patient's characteristics.[9]

The consensus statement, and the conference that made it, have been criticized by Wallace Sampson, writing for an affiliated publication of Quackwatch. Sampson stated that the meeting was chaired by a strong proponent of acupuncture, failed to include speakers who had obtained negative results on studies of acupuncture, and that he believed the report showed evidence of pseudoscientific reasoning.[117]

In 2006 the NIH's National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine continues to abide by the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Statement the effects of acupuncture have been documented, even if research is still unable to explain its mechanism and relationship to Western medicine.[20]
[edit] World Health Organization statement

In 2003, the World Health Organization's Department of Essential Drugs and Medicine Policy published a report on acupuncture that listed a series of diseases, symptoms or conditions for which acupuncture has been demonstrated as an effective treatment:[17]

    * Acute bacillary dysentery
    * Adverse reactions to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy
    * Allergic rhinitis
    * Biliary colic
    * Depression
    * Essential hypertension
    * Headache
    * Induction of childbirth and correction of the malposition of fetus
    * Inflammation of the tissues surrounding the shoulder
    * Leukopenia
    * Nausea and vomiting including morning sickness
    * Pain in the epigastrium, face, neck, tennis elbow, lower back, knee, during dentistry and after operations
    * Primary dysmenorrhea
    * Primary hypotension
    * Renal colic
    * Rheumatoid arthritis
    * Sciatica
    * Sprains
    * Strokes

The report also listed other conditions for which acupuncture may be effective.

The WHO explained the report's purpose:

    "In order to promote the appropriate use of acupuncture in those Member States where acupuncture has not been widely used, this document is annexed with a brief abstract of each relevant reference for the assessment of acupuncture practice. The clinical conditions covered in the existing data are also included. It must be emphasized that the list of diseases, symptoms or conditions covered in this publication is based on collected reports of clinical trials and, so, can serve only as a reference. Only national health authorities can determine the diseases, symptoms and conditions for which acupuncture treatment can be recommended."

The report was controversial; critics say it is cited by supporters as an endorsement of the practice by the WHO.[18] Several scientists also expressed concern that the evidence supporting acupuncture was weak, and that the WHO had been biased by the involvement of practitioners of alternative medicine.[18] The report was criticized in the 2008 book Trick or Treatment for containing two major errors - including too many results from low-quality clinical trials, and including a large number of trials originating in China. The latter issue is considered problematic because trials originating in the West include a mixture of positive, negative and neutral results while all trials in China are positive (the book's authors attribute this to publication bias rather than fraud). The authors also stated that the report was drafted by a panel that included no critics of acupuncture at all, resulting in a conflict of interest.[19]
[edit] American Medical Association statement

In 1997, the following statement was adopted as policy of the American Medical Association (AMA), an association of medical doctors and medical students, after a report on a number of alternative therapies including acupuncture:

    "There is little evidence to confirm the safety or efficacy of most alternative therapies. Much of the information currently known about these therapies makes it clear that many have not been shown to be efficacious. Well-designed, stringently controlled research should be done to evaluate the efficacy of alternative therapies."

Specifically regarding acupuncture, the AMA cited reviews conducted in 1992 and 1993 that stated there was not enough evidence to support acupuncture's effectiveness in treating disease, and called for further research.[118]
回復 ww_719 2010-4-25 11:11
你十三大爺: 我懶得翻譯了-來自維基百科英文板,請自己讀完。總而言之:針灸只屬於替代醫學。國家健康屬NIH和美國醫生協會AMA都提出了針灸的適應症。最主要的適應症是疼痛。
您這也太長了,看不懂了,哈哈..
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-25 11:17
ww_719: 您這也太長了,看不懂了,哈哈..
就看我回你的第一段中文就夠了。您也別想看明白,也別多琢磨,就您這單薄身段,看多了一會兒晚上做惡夢。
回復 ww_719 2010-4-25 11:23
你十三大爺: 就看我回你的第一段中文就夠了。您也別想看明白,也別多琢磨,就您這單薄身段,看多了一會兒晚上做惡夢。
好,聽您的,哈哈..
回復 Giada 2010-4-25 13:10
越看越不明白。
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-25 19:38
Giada: 越看越不明白。
您沒救了。。
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2010-4-26 00:36
你十三大爺: 您沒救了。。
什麼居心
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 01:10
穿鞋的蜻蜓: 什麼居心
那位大姐心眼兒小
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2010-4-26 01:33
你十三大爺: 那位大姐心眼兒小
她可是個熱心人。
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 03:05
穿鞋的蜻蜓: 她可是個熱心人。
你們都有點傻。。。
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2010-4-26 03:19
你十三大爺: 你們都有點傻。。。
啥叫傻?與人為善不對嗎。
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 03:34
穿鞋的蜻蜓: 啥叫傻?與人為善不對嗎。
這村裡的大多數人寫博客只為賺眼球。They don't have a fucking clue what they are talking about and its ramnifications.   Sorry, this may not be applicable to you, but applies to many idiots in this village.  It is so pathetic that people behave like that -- I don't understand their motive at all.
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2010-4-26 09:49
你十三大爺: 這村裡的大多數人寫博客只為賺眼球。They don't have a fucking clue what they are talking about and its ramnifications.   Sorry, this may not be applica
Now I am really clueless  about your 大爺脾氣There's nothing wrong with 賺眼球 since most people come here for fun,part of which is get some attention.I understand you may mean some folks are not up to your or whatever standard.Well even if that's true,why should they? Relax your honor亂寫幾句,喝杯啤酒消消火:)
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 11:23
穿鞋的蜻蜓: Now I am really clueless  about your 大爺脾氣There's nothing wrong with 賺眼球 since most people come here for fun,part of which is get some
I am not offended at all.  To have fun on this website is good and I came here for the same reason.  All I have said is that people should attract the attention of others through some meaningful stuff, not some meaningless tasteless blogs that even themselves would found repelled to read (that's what I meant by 賺眼球).  Does writing meaningful stuff require some degree of intelligence?  Probably yes, but more so a sense of honesty, decency and refusal to be a goo.  This should be the universal standard of this village, at least that's my view.
回復 goodoctor 2010-4-26 11:38
good one, but kind hard for the people who are not in biology/medicine field
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 11:46
goodoctor: good one, but kind hard for the people who are not in biology/medicine field
It is from Wikipedia Chinese straight without a change of a word.  Apparently a Chinese group reported last year the reactive oxygen species aligns with the proposed 經絡 in rodent。 I guess the whole body (fluorescent or high-resolution PET) imaging in live human will provide more evidence in the near future.  One thing for sure if 經絡 and 氣功 really works for our physiology, it is science more than anything else
回復 Giada 2010-4-26 11:56
你十三大爺: 您沒救了。。
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2010-4-26 12:01
你十三大爺: I am not offended at all.  To have fun on this website is good and I came here for the same reason.  All I have said is that people should attract th
Good point. I agree. But again, the standard for judging how  "meaningful"or "tasteful" is often rather subjective and personal ,which is natural. Also reading-writing is an interactive process, which involves not only the writers but also the readers'  interest,taste,etc, and the latter's response can repel or propel the former's desire to focus more on a certain theme, style,etc, . I personally think most bloggers  are writing meaningful if not interesting stuff. To me GIADA's  writing is both meaningful and interesting.Many people here are professionals who come here to relax and share whatever pops up and motivates them.Yes,it can be random and sometimes irritating, I guess that's the way it is,which is more fun:)  I like your view about avoiding "meaningless,tasteless 賺眼球" by having "a sense of honesty, decency and refusal to be a goo."
回復 十三大爺 2010-4-26 20:29
穿鞋的蜻蜓: Good point. I agree. But again, the standard for judging how  "meaningful"or "tasteful" is often rather subjective and personal ,
yeah don't be a goo.
12下一頁

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-4-26 12:42

返回頂部