倍可親

這回如何玩法?

作者:hu18  於 2011-5-13 00:48 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

通用分類:流水日記|已有37評論

       瞧(喬)大爺又冒泡了,這回又是道理上講得通,實際上行不通。美國特工隊可以在巴基斯坦取拉登性命,伊拉克特工隊眼下想在美國取小布希性命幾無可能。「金兵有狼牙棒,宋人有天靈蓋」——說到底就是胳膊扭不過大腿,結巴說不過快嘴,強弱異勢耳。

       小白臉葯家鑫怕農村人只傷不死找麻煩,捅死了拉倒;奧巴馬也怕拉登活著找麻煩,故繳槍不繳槍通殺,以絕後患。人皆曰葯家鑫該殺,卻不知奧巴馬罔顧「程序正義」,也是於法有差。美國律師們這回少了個發財的機會,卻一齊做了啞巴;只有一個不曉事的語言學家胡亂嚷嚷(謬論見附文)——不是法律磚家、法學叫獸,哪裡輪得著你亂點鴛鴦譜的喬老爺來說話?

       電影《追捕》故事結尾處,檢察官杜丘開槍殺了罪犯,矢村警長搶過手槍又補了幾槍,然後言道:「我打死他是正當防衛」,公然地為杜丘的違法行為作了遮蓋。當時看得真過癮,現在回頭想想,難道自視行為正當,就可以玩法?想想當下,這情形每況愈下,回頭再有人去上海吊車廠玩自動剎車也無須大驚小怪的了。

       胡話少說,且用一曲小令做收煞:[調寄如夢令]休說法相莊嚴,莫談程序正義,民主爆菊花!這回如何玩法?玩法、玩法,誰個臉白嘴小?誰個臉黑嘴大?

[附]
Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden』s Death
May 6, 2011

It』s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress 「suspects.」 In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it 「believed」 that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn』t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn』t have. Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that 「we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.」

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden』s 「confession,」 but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

There is also much media discussion of Washington』s anger that Pakistan didn』t turn over bin Laden, though surely elements of the military and security forces were aware of his presence in Abbottabad. Less is said about Pakistani anger that the U.S. invaded their territory to carry out a political assassination. Anti-American fervor is already very high in Pakistan, and these events are likely to exacerbate it. The decision to dump the body at sea is already, predictably, provoking both anger and skepticism in much of the Muslim world.
It's like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It』s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes 「Jew」 and 「Gypsy.」

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush』s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden』s, and he is not a 「suspect」 but uncontroversially the 「decider」 who gave the orders to commit the 「supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole」 (quoting the Nuremberg Tribunal) for which Nazi criminals were hanged: the hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, destruction of much of the country, the bitter sectarian conflict that has now spread to the rest of the region.

There』s more to say about [Cuban airline bomber Orlando] Bosch, who just died peacefully in Florida, including reference to the 「Bush doctrine」 that societies that harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves and should be treated accordingly. No one seemed to notice that Bush was calling for invasion and destruction of the U.S. and murder of its criminal president.

Same with the name, Operation Geronimo. The imperial mentality is so profound, throughout western society, that no one can perceive that they are glorifying bin Laden by identifying him with courageous resistance against genocidal invaders. It』s like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It』s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes 「Jew」 and 「Gypsy.」
There is much more to say, but even the most obvious and elementary facts should provide us with a good deal to think about.

http://www.guernicamag.com/blog/2652/noam_chomsky_my_reaction_to_os/

1

高興

感動

同情
7

搞笑

難過
1

拍磚
4

支持
7

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (20 人)

發表評論 評論 (37 個評論)

回復 海外憤青 2011-5-13 01:30
打死提人氣,活捉更有利。
回復 穿鞋的蜻蜓 2011-5-13 01:39
瞧母撕雞是中國的留小脖,敢跟政府對干,不過他是極左派, 反帝反壓迫.
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 01:49
海外憤青: 打死提人氣,活捉更有利。
未必未必
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 01:50
穿鞋的蜻蜓: 瞧母撕雞是中國的留小脖,敢跟政府對干,不過他是極左派, 反帝反壓迫.
一個可歌可泣,一個是可賀可喜
回復 RidgeWalker 2011-5-13 02:22
不守法的人多了去了,惟有利益圈外的人遭法辦。
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 02:24
RidgeWalker: 不守法的人多了去了,惟有利益圈外的人遭法辦。
竊鉤者豬,竊國者猴——前者蠢得如豬,後者精得似猴。
回復 早安太陽 2011-5-13 02:59
  
回復 pengl 2011-5-13 05:24
hu18: 竊鉤者豬,竊國者猴——前者蠢得如豬,後者精得似猴。
莊子聽到他的「竊鉤者誅,竊國者侯」被如此竄改,不知尚能眠否?
回復 華東26 2011-5-13 06:29
喬老頭在MIT被供著養著,每次開罵還坐無虛席。哄著學生反政府。應該給他點和諧的味道嘗嘗。
回復 8288 2011-5-13 06:42
  
回復 人間的盒子 2011-5-13 10:11
葯家鑫實在無法辯了呀,其它情況都可以打擦邊球的。
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 10:32
pengl: 莊子聽到他的「竊鉤者誅,竊國者侯」被如此竄改,不知尚能眠否?
莊子不是豬猴,人家早已化蝶。
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 10:33
華東26: 喬老頭在MIT被供著養著,每次開罵還坐無虛席。哄著學生反政府。應該給他點和諧的味道嘗嘗。
美國也對喬大叔玩河蟹,美國也就不可愛了
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 10:34
人間的盒子: 葯家鑫實在無法辯了呀,其它情況都可以打擦邊球的。
有葯也沒治
回復 Giada 2011-5-13 13:26
一個自己承認是911 事件幕後操作的人,還想著碰到美國人能夠只被逮捕,用美國納稅人的錢進行冗長的法庭審訊,盡其作秀之能事?以為美國人都是傻子嗎?奧巴馬的司法部長就職不久就說過,we will read Miranda rights to Bin Laden's corpse. 本拉登自己應該知道,碰到美軍就是死路一條。讓別人去當人肉炸彈,自己居然沒能腰間捆著炸藥跟敵人同歸於盡地成仁,這樣的人居然還被人稱為英雄,奇怪。
回復 pengl 2011-5-13 13:43
hu18: 莊子不是豬猴,人家早已化蝶。
   羽化成仙
回復 yulinw 2011-5-13 16:17
   那誰誰不是說了么:法律奏是個擋箭牌~~ 殺拉燈玩的不錯~~
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 23:18
Giada: 一個自己承認是911 事件幕後操作的人,還想著碰到美國人能夠只被逮捕,用美國納稅人的錢進行冗長的法庭審訊,盡其作秀之能事?以為美國人都是傻子嗎?奧巴馬的司 ...
是,對小葯、老拉立地撲殺,浪費錢走什麼法律程序幹嗎?
回復 hu18 2011-5-13 23:25
yulinw:    那誰誰不是說了么:法律奏是個擋箭牌~~ 殺拉燈玩的不錯~~
活得明白,死了活該。
回復 Giada 2011-5-14 13:00
hu18: 是,對小葯、老拉立地撲殺,浪費錢走什麼法律程序幹嗎?
胡爺不要把二者混為一談。姓葯的是中國人,在中國犯法,所以中國的法律要保護他,給他一個審判。如果本拉登是美國人,那他也許會和炸Oklahoma聯邦大樓的Timothy McVeigh一樣,經過審判執行死刑。
本拉登不是美國人,他不用遵從美國的法律,因此也不受美國法律的保護。本拉登是個公開以殺美國人為目標的人,不管是平民百姓還是職業軍人,對他來說都沒有什麼區別,都要殺。把這種人抓到美國本土來受美國法律的保護,是萬不得已的下下策。本拉登的手上不僅有美國人的鮮血,還有那些成為人肉炸彈的窮苦阿拉伯青年人的血。他是個用犧牲別人的生命 來達到自己的目的的冷酷的人。美國人把他看高了,以為他會身上藏著炸彈跟美軍同歸於盡的人。奧巴馬在「60分鐘」里表明了,他對海豹隊員的生命比本拉登的生死重視得多,為了不讓本拉登拉炸彈,海豹隊員採取的是先下手為強的方法,誰知道本拉登根本沒想著自殺。
在國際事務中,任何一個國家的政府的首要任務就是要保護自己國家的利益,其他都是次要的。這個原則不僅美國政府遵守,加拿大,中國政府也遵守。這次美國殺本拉登的行動是保護美國利益的行動。
12下一頁

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-6-15 05:23

返回頂部