倍可親

該怎麼做?

作者:fanlaifuqu  於 2016-3-31 02:05 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:分享|通用分類:熱點雜談|已有17評論

大俠的文在頭版頭條,一般不會錯漏。
我和大多數人的想法一致,這樣的觀點與趨勢不知是否和大俠的擔憂有關聯。把今天的新聞放上來,元芳,你說呢?

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe torture can be justified to extract information from suspected terrorists, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, a level of support similar to that seen in countries like Nigeria where militant attacks are common.

The poll reflects a U.S. public on edge after the massacre of 14 people in San Bernardino in December and large-scale attacks in Europe in recent months, including a bombing claimed by the militant group Islamic State last week that killed at least 32 people in Belgium.

Donald Trump, the front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, has forcefully injected the issue of whether terrorism suspects should be tortured into the election campaign.

Trump has said he would seek to roll back President Barack Obama's ban on waterboarding - an interrogation technique that simulates drowning that human rights groups contend is illegal under the Geneva Conventions. Trump has also vowed to "bring back a hell of a lot worse" if elected.

Most Americans are more concerned about security and defeating the Islamic State than they are about privacy rights, a new Morning Consult poll finds.

A whopping 71% of respondents said they supported requiring companies like Facebook, Apple and Google to give law enforcement access to their personal information. And 76% want those companies to assist in terror-related investigations. Two-thirds want them to turn over information so the government can identify and monitor potential terrorists.

Those numbers belie tech companies』 recent stances against providing such information after federal authorities asked Apple to help them get into an iPhone used by a San Bernardino shooter. The Department of Justice dropped its request Monday after finding another way to access the phone.

The Morning Consult poll, which surveyed voters in the days following the terror attacks in Brussels last week, also found half of Americans support temporarily banning foreign Muslim from entering the United States, a move espoused by Republican front-runner Donald Trump.

 And 49% support stepped up patrols of Muslim neighborhoods, which Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has recommended.

The balance between privacy and security has become a flashpoint in recent months as Republican candidates have proposed more intrusive methods to thwart attacks.

Here are some other interesting findings from the poll:

• 78% support an added layer of security outside airports

• 75% support increasing funding for the Transportation Security Administration

• 84% support increased training for TSA agents

• 81% back increasing funding for background checks on airport workers

支持對恐怖主義分子用酷刑和給政府更大的權益而不在乎自己的隱私,已漸漸成為主流!


高興

感動

同情

搞笑
2

難過

拍磚
5

支持
10

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (17 人)

發表評論 評論 (17 個評論)

回復 小皮狗 2016-3-31 02:22
在反恐問題上,也許應防止:以點帶面的擴大化,治標不治本的非人性。而對於民意支持的解讀上也許應明白: 「水能載舟,亦能覆舟」。
回復 天涯看客 2016-3-31 02:29
對恐怖分子講人權是對普通大眾人權的最大的踐踏!!!!
回復 天涯看客 2016-3-31 02:33
我不喜歡走極端,不喜歡政府控制一切,也不喜歡Apple那樣,以保護隱私為借口而不惜違抗法院法令!
回復 fanlaifuqu 2016-3-31 02:36
天涯看客: 我不喜歡走極端,不喜歡政府控制一切,也不喜歡Apple那樣,以保護隱私為借口而不惜違抗法院法令!
apple 還是為生意著想. 你的觀點和我一樣.
回復 酸柚子 2016-3-31 02:57
我更怕政府作惡,它比恐怖分子更可怕
回復 jc0473 2016-3-31 03:04
既要最大範圍保護人民利益又要穩准狠打擊恐怖極端勢力。相信在民主制度下各民族團結、智慧和力量一定能夠戰勝邪惡
回復 白露為霜 2016-3-31 03:20
"Most Americans are more concerned about security and defeating the Islamic State than they are about privacy rights,"

人民感到不安全,其他都談不上。
回復 xqw63 2016-3-31 04:19
咱屬於支持這個建議的一員,為了對付恐怖分子,犧牲一點個人隱私值得,而且,咱相信,這些被政府掌握的隱私,僅僅只能用於對付恐怖主義,美國會出台防止政府掌握個人隱私擴大化的法律,正像醫生掌握病人個人健康隱私,不得用於和治療疾病不相干的領域
回復 i0u 2016-3-31 04:35
前些日子在Flipboard上看了篇文章關於美國研究推行社區行為跟蹤,希望能做到對恐怖分子的演變進行預先干預,很類似於中國當年居委會的性質,不知道能不能真的起到作用也~~對於酷刑,我的理解是醫學如此發展了,應該有藥物可以讓人說出真話啊~~
回復 hu18 2016-3-31 06:42
民主誠可貴,自由價更高。若為國安故,兩者皆尿脬。
回復 dwqdaniel 2016-3-31 06:43
jc0473: 既要最大範圍保護人民利益又要穩准狠打擊恐怖極端勢力。相信在民主制度下各民族團結、智慧和力量一定能夠戰勝邪惡
說的好,最大範圍保護人民利益又要穩准狠打擊恐怖極端勢力不矛盾,納稅人花了錢供養政府,它有義務處理好這個關係
回復 fanlaifuqu 2016-3-31 06:50
hu18: 民主誠可貴,自由價更高。若為國安故,兩者皆尿脬。
此處尿為啥唸sui?
回復 hu18 2016-3-31 06:58
fanlaifuqu: 此處尿為啥唸sui?
到底是怎麼回事,我也無解。印象中,北人多讀NIAO,南方人(江浙滬)多念SUI。
回復 jc0473 2016-3-31 07:27
dwqdaniel: 說的好,最大範圍保護人民利益又要穩准狠打擊恐怖極端勢力不矛盾,納稅人花了錢供養政府,它有義務處理好這個關係
相信人民的覺悟久經考驗
回復 越湖 2016-3-31 11:08
酸柚子: 我更怕政府作惡,它比恐怖分子更可怕
說得好。
回復 ryu 2016-3-31 11:21
美國政府有糾錯功能,靜觀吧。
回復 第二片雲 2016-4-6 14:19
隱私誠可貴,自由價更高。若為保小命,兩者都打包。中國也好米國也好,人類還是離不開達爾文的叢林法則。

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2025-7-18 10:21

返回頂部