倍可親

老美看美國(五)為何奧巴馬2012年會贏?共和黨是如何自毀長城的?

作者:丹奇  於 2011-11-7 22:47 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:美國人看美國|通用分類:熱點雜談|已有140評論

美國人看美國(5 為何奧巴馬2012年會贏

-------共和黨是如何自毀長城的

/他爹  翻譯/丹奇

 

共和黨已經四分五裂了,就像加沙地帶的戰爭區。隨著共和黨候選人們在黨內提名進行的辯論會已經越來越近的黨內預選,很明顯的,「最右派最保守」的那個會贏。茶黨已經給他們的辯論注入了新的保守主義觀點,以至於每個候選人都在力爭成為那個觀點最右派的人。

前面幾場辯論下來,觀眾叫好的有以下幾點:

對大多數囚犯執行死刑(瑞克佩里德州州長)

讓那些沒有保險的病人去死 (榮坡德州國會議員)

對那個目前在伊拉克服役的同性戀軍官起鬨

為明顯把稅賦重擔向貧困或中產階級傾斜的計劃叫好

消除最低工資和取消工會的計劃

重新劃分國會選區,明明那個區的人口分布不符合規則,但要確保共和黨多數人的地方

獨特的新法律使流產變得非法(密西西比的新法即將投票表決)

那麼,對那些強硬派而言,這些都是很精彩的事情,基本反映了一部分他們那個黨派是誰的屬性。問題是這些觀點是如此的極右以至於在總統選舉中是不可選的。

選舉通常是由「獨立」選民決定的---一個觀點傾向於中間派的群體。除了一個人外,共和黨基本上沒有哪個候選人能夠打敗奧巴馬。這個人就是洪博培,猶他州前任州長,前任美國駐華大使。但是,他對共和黨陣營沒有吸引力。他太溫和了。他相信科學,不讓上帝統治他的政治,而是非常開明。

獨立選民確保我們不選一個極左或極右的總統。目前的這幫共和黨候選人使布希看起來像是一個溫和的民主黨了。共和黨陣營發現很難相信米特羅姆尼因為他太自由主義且翻來覆去。他們現在也不喜歡瑞克佩里因為他看起來太愚蠢無知,他允許非法移民在德州大學享受州內學費。現在民調領先者是赫曼可恩。即使出現性醜聞和明顯的知識匱乏,這個人在目前的共和黨候選人里還是領先的。這個人說過,我們應該在墨西哥邊境修建電圍牆讓那些試圖翻越的人觸電死。他還說我們應該在邊境修築水壩,放些鱷魚在裡面把那些試圖過河的人吃掉。也是這個人不知道中國有核武器,不知道「回歸權」問題指的是巴勒斯坦人,甚至拿烏茲別克地名開結巴玩笑。難道這就是我們自由世界需要的領袖嗎?難道這就是共和黨能提供的最好的人選?為何這個人在民調上能夠領先?

這個答案要在過去30年人口統計的政治版圖變遷里找到。自從里根成為總統起,共和黨右翼有了很大的成長,並且變得越加好戰,越加「白人化」,越加宗教化,越加積極使用軍隊作為政策的工具。當這些使得共和黨在過去的30年裡有18年佔領了總統寶座,我相信共和黨內部已經變得極端右派時,由獨立選民掌控的搖擺票將作出正確的選擇奧巴馬的另一個四年,即使他在國內的成就記錄不良,經濟任然低迷,失業率任然很高。

共和黨在此次的選舉中可謂成功地搬起石頭砸了自己的腳。他們沒有很強的領袖,他們拒絕對聰明的人(洪博培)感興趣。共和黨變得如此熱衷於「文化」爭鬥,他們正在奪回白宮的政治戰爭中落敗。

2010年共和黨競選的綱領是更多的工作機會,更多的刺激經濟的計劃。然而,他們在國會和全國範圍內的立法卻是有關軍中同性戀,同性戀婚姻,英語作為本國語言,加深「我們信上帝」的口號,通過不延長債務上限幾乎將美國推入不履行義務的境地。所有這些也許是很好的政治伎倆,但是卻是糟糕透頂的國家政策,對拯救國家或提供就業機會絕對於事無補。

共和黨一直在扮演強硬的政治角色,他們陣營的選民被激發了。在換屆選舉中,他們得不到獨立選民的選票。奧巴馬將贏得另一個任期繼續當美國總統。事實上,民主黨可能贏回國會眾議院並成為參議院多數,因為右派的誇張和說辭在全國性辯論上沒有加分,反而進一步在財富階級,種族,企業主和工人問題上,分裂了國家,

階級鬥爭」戰略的唯一一方共和黨 這個國家不喜歡 - 它會201211即將舉行的選舉付出昂貴的代價。

 

(英文原文)

 

WHY OBAMA WILL WIN IN 2012

And how the Republicans destroyed themselves

By Tadie (November 6th, 2011)

 

The Republican party has become so fractured it resembles a war zone in Gaza. As the GOP candidates for their party』s nomination for president debate each other and near the beginning of the primaries it has become more evident that only the 「most far right conservative」 can win. The Tea Party has injected their neo conservative view so much into the debate that each candidate must outdo the others to be farther right in their views.

During the previous debates the crowds have cheered the following:

  1. Executing the most prisoners ( Rick Perry – Governor of Texas )
  2. Letting uninsured sick people die ( Ron Paul – Congressman Texas )
  3. Booing an Army Officer who is currently serving in Iraq because he is gay
  4. Cheering tax plans that obviously tilt the tax burden onto the poor and middle class
  5. Plans to eliminate the minimum wage and bust unions
  6. Redraw Congressional districts that do not match the demographics of the area but rather to insure GOP majority
  7. Unique new laws  to make abortion illegal ( Mississippi new law coming up for vote )

Now, to their hard core base these are all wonderful things and generally speaking part of their platform of whom they are as a party. The problem with this is that the views have gone so far right that it makes them unelectable in any Presidential election!

Elections are always decided by the 「Independent」 voters – a group that tends to be very 「centrist」 in their views. It would be virtually impossible for any of the GOP candidates to beat President Obama – except for one. That one person is Jon Huntsman, former Governor of Utah and Ambassador to China. But, he doesn』t appeal to the base. He』s too moderate. He believes in science, doesn』t let God rule his politics and is very cultured.

The 「independent」 voters keep us, as a nation, from electing Presidents that get to far to the right or the left. The current crop of GOP candidates make George Bush appear as a moderate Democrat. The GOP base finds it difficult to believe in Mitt Romney because he』s too liberal and a flip flopper. They don』t like Rick Perry right now because he appears, well, stupid and uninformed and he allowed illegals to have in state tuition at Texas universities. The leader however in the polls right now is Herman Cain. Even after a sex scandal and his obvious lack of knowledge this man leads in the polls of the current Presidential candidates for the Republicans. This man is one who said we should build a fence along the border with Mexico that is electric so we could kill those who tried to climb it. He also said we should build a water way along the border and put alligators in it to eat those who tried to cross it.  This is a man who didn』t know that China has nuclear weapons, didn』t know what the 「right of return 「 issue was for the Palestinians, makes a joke out of 「Ubeki  beki beki stan stan」 ( Uzbekistan ). Is this the kind of man we want to be the leader of the free world? Is this the best the GOP has to offer? Why is this man leading in the polls?

The answer to that can be found in how the demographics of the political landscape have changed the past 30 years.  Since Reagan was President there has been a growth in the right wing of the GOP that has become more and more militant, more white, more religious and more active in the use of the military as a policy tool.

While this has allowed the GOP to control the Presidency for 18 out of the past 30 years I believe that the shift in the GOP has gone so far right that the pendulum controlled by the Independent voters will make the correct choice – another 4 years for Obama, even though he has a poor domestic record of achievement and the economy is still very sluggish and unemployment remains high.

The Republicans have done a great job at shooting themselves in the foot this election cycle. They don』t have a strong leader and they refuse to be interested in the smart one (Huntsman).  The GOP has become so involved in the 「cultural」 battles that they are losing the political war of getting back the White House!

In 2010 the Republicans campaigned on more jobs, more programs to boost the economy. However, the legislation they have provided in Congress and across the country have been about gays in the military, gay marriage, English as a national language, reaffirming our motto of 「In God We Trust」 and nearly pushing the USA into default on its obligations by not extending the debt ceiling. All of these things may be good political tactics but it makes terrible national policy and does nothing, absolutely nothing, to solve the countries ills or provide jobs.

The GOP has been playing pure hardball politics and their base voter is excited. But, in a General Election they will not get the Independent voter on their side and Obama will win another term as President of the United States. Indeed, the Democrats may even win the House of Representatives back and increase their majority in the Senate because of the far right hyperbole and rhetoric that has added nothing to the national debate but has only served to further divide this country along class of wealth, race, business owner and worker.

The only party waging a 「class warfare」 strategy is the GOP – and the nation doesn』t like it – and it will cost them dearly in the coming elections of November 2012.

 

 


高興

感動

同情

搞笑

難過
1

拍磚
4

支持
29

鮮花

剛表態過的朋友 (34 人)

發表評論 評論 (140 個評論)

回復 wcat 2011-11-7 22:50
覺得Mitt Romney 能嬴的提名
回復 解濱 2011-11-7 22:54
共和黨人才枯竭,已經拿不出一個像樣的總統候選人了。 我不看好共和黨的任何一個參選者。
回復 roaming 2011-11-7 22:56
同意LZ觀點,感覺到共和黨這次的前幾名候選人都很差!
Romney雖然不錯,但入錯了教堂,也只好陪襯一下了!
回復 fanlaifuqu 2011-11-7 23:19
兩黨都不能走極端,尤其民主黨。
回復 sdwddnh 2011-11-7 23:23
最好讓佩林當選,感覺這樣對世界其他國家更有好處!
回復 布衣人 2011-11-7 23:49
解濱: 共和黨人才枯竭,已經拿不出一個像樣的總統候選人了。 我不看好共和黨的任何一個參選者。
民主黨也夠嗆,盡說空話大話,08的change成了假大空的標誌。
回復 hr8888hr 2011-11-7 23:55
其實我覺得選舉說辭只是一種策略,主要是看他的內閣團隊, 總統只是個協調者, 不需要很強的或面面俱到的專業知識. 強勢的總統對確保的美國利益未必就有利
回復 解濱 2011-11-8 00:00
布衣人: 民主黨也夠嗆,盡說空話大話,08的change成了假大空的標誌。
同意。 兩黨現在都拿不出或實施不了拯救美國經濟的好辦法。
回復 媽々 2011-11-8 00:37
為何奧巴馬2012年會贏?
看這老大的題目,大娘就蒙了,尋思著會不會是老年痴呆症又犯了涅
慌慌張張把那日曆本子請出來左瞧右瞅————沒錯呀,是2011年!
可是閨女,你咋連2012年的事兒都看見咧涅? 該不會是穿越了一個來回吧
回復 neo42 2011-11-8 00:50
Romney pretty much destroyed MA when he was the governor there. It is difficult to have a Mormon become president of US anyway. Ron Paul would be a great candidate but he won't. Obama has no talents nor enough hearts to turn US around. It has becoming painfully obvious that empty talks were all this guy is good for. The once united America becomes a dramatically split nation ironically still under the name of "united states". Selfishness of the political parties is a poison that unfortunately eating this once great country alive. Wall street occupiers, incapable as they have shown, is just one corner of a much greater iceberg, the outcry by the Americans and their collect lose of confidence in the government and in the country. It is only too bad that there is no leader in either parties that have the brain and heart to lead USA back to a correct route.
回復 neo42 2011-11-8 00:53
媽々: 看這老大的題目,大娘就蒙了,尋思著會不會是老年痴呆症又犯了涅
慌慌張張把那日曆本子請出來左瞧右瞅————沒錯呀,是2011年!
可是閨女,你咋連2012年 ...
LOL
回復 neo42 2011-11-8 00:55
fanlaifuqu: 兩黨都不能走極端,尤其民主黨。
each parties have their bills to pay. it is not totally up to their leaders what actions to take. JFK was such a good albeit negative example.
回復 awang9988 2011-11-8 01:34
說的沒錯。 O8會當選,因為共和黨更爛。
回復 海外憤青 2011-11-8 01:36
文章只看到了表面。按小奧總統目前的政績,雖不怎樣但也無大過,黑人總統不當滿兩屆對不起觀眾,所以共和黨基本無戲,本屆若拉出一匹上等馬出來和O8對壘,反而損失了元氣,美國總統候選人落敗后再選的機會很小,所以有本事的人12年是不會出馬的。

但選又必須選的,不如放手博一把,讓一些無所謂的人,說出真正選舉時不敢說的話、咬不敢咬的事,既宣揚了共和黨某些極端的政治理念,候選人也圖個嘴上快活博得名氣。這是一種戰略。
回復 Laile 2011-11-8 01:40
wcat: 覺得Mitt Romney 能嬴的提名
貓貓懂的真多啊,佩服一下哈。
回復 8288 2011-11-8 01:40
只有政黨利益的美國政冶
回復 Laile 2011-11-8 01:41
sdwddnh: 最好讓佩林當選,感覺這樣對世界其他國家更有好處!
有胸無腦啊。
回復 wcat 2011-11-8 01:41
Laile: 貓貓懂的真多啊,佩服一下哈。
多看新聞
回復 Laile 2011-11-8 01:42
布衣人: 民主黨也夠嗆,盡說空話大話,08的change成了假大空的標誌。
他除了從伊拉克撤軍外,真的沒什麼改變。
回復 tanghan 2011-11-8 01:46
完全同意。

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-4-23 23:34

返回頂部