倍可親

奧巴馬的醫療改革不會成功

作者:goodoctor  於 2010-3-21 15:40 發表於 最熱鬧的華人社交網路--貝殼村

作者分類:分享|通用分類:流水日記|已有40評論

關鍵詞:

這裡是網友評論第2頁,點擊查看原文

發表評論 評論 (40 個評論)

回復 RNSandi 2010-3-22 03:52
讓我想起了FDR
回復 鍋爐爺爺 2010-3-22 05:11
"過多的醫療訴訟和醫療賠償才是美國醫療費用高漲的最重要的原因"
Could you please provide proof that malpractice lawsuit is the most important factor? I found it interesting you neglected to mention the high cost of doing insurance paperwork as an important factor.

"他的改革其實是鼓勵美國人放棄對健康生活方式的追求,是鼓勵美國人變的更懶惰"
Your assumption is that once given health insurance, those currently without would switch from a healthy lifestyle to one that is abusive of their bodies, could you provide data to support that?
The US healthcare system is the best in the world for those who can afford it, but that also came as the expense of neglecting the needs of millions. To me, that is immoral.
回復 鍋爐爺爺 2010-3-22 05:15
解濱: 同意你的觀點! 美國民主黨的所謂醫改不過是把目前的危機延長幾年而已,並不解決任何問題。 美國醫療體制的根本問題是成本居高不下,百姓根本無法負擔如此龐大的
"美國醫療體制的根本問題是成本居高不下,百姓根本無法負擔如此龐大的支出。
"
I thought lower the cost is the whole point of the reform?
回復 xqw63 2010-3-22 06:36
同意,不會成功
回復 Giada 2010-3-22 08:24
政客嗎就是這樣,他競選時做了保證,不表示一下不成。不成功就可以另說了。
回復 我看世界 2010-3-22 10:03
homepeace: 醫療改革,方向正確
同意。醫改的方向是正確的,但奧氏的方法是會將問題越弄越糟。
回復 homepeace 2010-3-22 10:16
我看世界: 同意。醫改的方向是正確的,但奧氏的方法是會將問題越弄越糟。
方法的缺點可以在以後改進。對於樓住的4個觀點的批評:
1。醫療訴訟賠償額度的問題,醫改不醫改都存在。
2。醫改不會減少醫生的收入。
3。醫改也沒有i鼓勵美國人放棄對健康生活方式的追求。相反,醫保機構為了降低成本,勢必重視疾病的預防(現在可以把病人剔出)
4。美國為他國支付高額醫療費很不公平。應該共同分擔。
回復 我看世界 2010-3-22 10:20
putongren10: 醫療改革 is a  must
brown is a big joke!!!
共和黨已經把美國搞成第三世界了,
再讓y 們亂搞,美國就是辛巴威
現在就辛巴威了。沒看很多小學都只上4天學了。沒錢啊!這個奧總統只顧花錢,沒有想到怎樣激勵人們創業,激勵行業復甦,激勵解決就業問題。周五的勞工委員會報告,就業形勢再度惡化。35個城市的失業率達到15%。這錢花沒了,下一步就是戰爭了。搶劫全世界。
回復 xoyuanfen 2010-3-22 21:05
tanjiang10: 共和黨不想搞醫療改革,這是人所共知的,
改總比不改要好。
不可能一次就改成功,但不改就肯定更麻煩
同意, 任何一件事都有利有弊, 希望改革往更好的方向走。
回復 xoyuanfen 2010-3-22 21:05
任何一件事都有利有弊, 好醫生的觀點也有道理。
回復 fishingperch 2010-3-22 22:22
homepeace: 方法的缺點可以在以後改進。對於樓住的4個觀點的批評:
1。醫療訴訟賠償額度的問題,醫改不醫改都存在。
2。醫改不會減少醫生的收入。
3。醫改也沒有i鼓勵美國人
nice catch!
回復 homepeace 2010-3-23 00:32
fishingperch: nice catch!
Thank You!
回復 tanjiang10 2010-3-23 01:06
xoyuanfen: 同意, 任何一件事都有利有弊, 希望改革往更好的方向走。
改革派與保守派之爭
回復 解濱 2010-3-23 01:34
鍋爐爺爺: "美國醫療體制的根本問題是成本居高不下,百姓根本無法負擔如此龐大的支出。
"
I thought lower the cost is the whole point of the reform?
No.  The main purpose of the healthcare reform is to expand coverage - insure the 32 million uninsured poor people.   Lowering the cost is just a lie.  When a doctor prescribes a flu patient with 200 different kind of lab tests,   the cost is out of control.  However, the doctor must do so in order to avoid medical malpractice law suits.  This in one of the major reasons of high medical costs (defensive medicine).   The so called "healthcare reform bill" does not address this issue at all.
回復 bestwishes 2010-3-23 08:25
light12: 保險公司不能因為病人病史拒保,一般人保費要上漲許多?
那麼,你認為保險公司應該不保身有病史的病人?
要是如此,醫療保險的作用就以經失去一大半.
回復 light12 2010-3-23 08:29
bestwishes: 那麼,你認為保險公司應該不保身有病史的病人?
要是如此,醫療保險的作用就以經失去一大半.
我沒有認為。我講的是保費要上漲
回復 bestwishes 2010-3-23 08:57
The main problems of American medical healthcare are: First, American physicians' charge are too much. We know, their incomes are the highest in the world. Second, Hospitalization charge also too much. Patients, or even the insurance groups cannot afford to pay such expense. Third, Medicines are too costly. Fourth, medical Insurance company's premiums are too high. There are still many others.
Anyway, American health care system has gone down to an irretreivable situation that needs a total renovation.  Unfortunately, American politics, together with the interest groups block the way for the sake of selfishness and greediness.
Frankly speaking, for the existing situations of American healthcare, any reforms is futile, because it is too late and too much involvement.
It needs an overall revolution!
回復 鍋爐爺爺 2010-3-23 09:19
解濱: No.  The main purpose of the healthcare reform is to expand coverage - insure the 32 million uninsured poor people.   Lowering the cost is just a lie
Expanding coverage is the short term goal, reining in cost (or at least slowing growth of cost) is long term.
I don't doubt malpractice lawsuits are major problems and I think there needs to be some kind of reform on that. However, there is no evidence that this is THE most important factor of high healthcare cost
回復 自由之靈 2010-3-23 19:06
我所有的醫生朋友和在藥廠工作的朋友都反對這個醫改。
回復 老牛嘎嘎 2010-3-25 07:58
tanjiang10: 共和黨不想搞醫療改革,這是人所共知的,
改總比不改要好。
不可能一次就改成功,但不改就肯定更麻煩
不能說「改總比不改要好」,如果越改越壞為什麼還要改哪?
12

facelist doodle 塗鴉板

您需要登錄后才可以評論 登錄 | 註冊

關於本站 | 隱私權政策 | 免責條款 | 版權聲明 | 聯絡我們

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外華人中文門戶:倍可親 (http://big5.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系統基於 Discuz! X3.1 商業版 優化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站時間採用京港台時間 GMT+8, 2024-5-22 02:24

返回頂部