新聞評論：中國為何會出現「廢棄電動汽車墳場」？

我也說幾句

已有(32)人發表了評論

[ 正序查看留言 ]       [ 查看原文 ]

回復 舉報 [ 33樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 06:32

32樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): crisis of 2008? Because it encouraged loans to low income pe...

globalization? Reagan is right, governments are the problems sometimes!

回復 舉報 [ 32樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 06:31

31樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): To be fair, The US government intervention in economics are...

crisis of 2008? Because it encouraged loans to low income people to build ownership society! global

回復 舉報 [ 31樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 06:31

29樓 遊客(216.181.x.x): 中國做什麼事，都是顧頭不顧尾，或虎頭蛇尾，或爛尾！！！！！！...

To be fair, The US government intervention in economics are not good either, remember housing cr

回復 舉報 [ 30樓 遊客 (216.181.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 05:39

豬頭的新三樣最後會和爛尾樓雄安鬼城一樣下場

回復 舉報 [ 29樓 遊客 (216.181.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 05:38

中國做什麼事，都是顧頭不顧尾，或虎頭蛇尾，或爛尾！！！！！！！！！！

回復 舉報 [ 28樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:51

27樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): How much it is really subsidizing is 糊塗賬，蠻幹 like popul...

Another time bomb

回復 舉報 [ 27樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:51

26樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): damages to road. Most manufactures are loosing money need go...

How much it is really subsidizing is 糊塗賬，蠻幹 like population control and property market. Tim

回復 舉報 [ 26樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:47

25樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): addition, EVs are not paying taxes when bought, no road fees...

damages to road. Most manufactures are loosing money need government rebate to survive

回復 舉報 [ 25樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:47

24樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): encourage use of EV, that expense is absorbed by CCP governm...

addition, EVs are not paying taxes when bought, no road fees when driven but do more damages to ro

回復 舉報 [ 24樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:46

23樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): those piles are 100kw to 400 kW, normal grade won't work. Se...

encourage use of EV, that expense is absorbed by CCP government in the form of debt, in addition,

回復 舉報 [ 23樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:43

22樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): more harm than good. since China is not like the US, most pe...

those piles are 100kw to 400 kW, normal grade won't work. Separate grid need to be built. To encou

回復 舉報 [ 22樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:43

21樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): efficiency barely better than steam engine, in terms of clim...

more harm than good. since China is not like the US, most people use public pile to charge EV, tho

回復 舉報 [ 21樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:42

20樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): efficiency for EV but since EV is usually 40% heavier. So th...

efficiency barely better than steam engine, in terms of climate, at least in China, it is doing mo

回復 舉報 [ 20樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:42

19樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): efficiency of about 45%, long distance electric transmission...

efficiency for EV but since EV is usually 40% heavier. So the end result is about 20% efficiency b

回復 舉報 [ 19樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:41

18樓 遊客(24.60.x.x): Really?  here is some news for you. 75% of electri...

efficiency of about 45%, long distance electric transmission efficiency is 85%. Driving is 90% eff

回復 舉報 [ 18樓 遊客 (24.60.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-18 01:40

15樓 遊客(174.7.x.x): 美國都不允許中共電車進入美國生產，這是比補貼厲害100倍的行政...

Really?  here is some news for you. 75% of electricity generation in China is from coal with thermo

回復 舉報 [ 17樓 遊客 (74.103.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-17 21:50

更可怕的是在歐洲港口存放的大量包包車， 那才是包包的噩夢。。。。

回復 舉報 [ 15樓 遊客 (174.7.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-17 14:00

13樓

美國都不允許中共電車進入美國生產，這是比補貼厲害100倍的行政手段。如果允許中共電車進入美國建廠，美國所有汽車品牌統統倒閉，美國只能用如此行政手段打壓

回復 舉報 [ 14樓 遊客 (174.7.x.x) ] 發表於 2024-11-17 13:58

13樓 遊客(23.243.x.x): 美國補貼的是在本土生產本土銷售的電車，你五毛.

放你媽的屁，美國不但補貼車輛，還禁止打壓中國高科技，而中共除了補貼卻沒有其他行政手段

提示：本頁有 1 條評論因可能與主題不符而被省略