-
已有(11)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 12樓 遊客 (72.139.x.x) ] 發表於
- O.K. It is interesting to talk about speed of light and freedom. In fact, the answers are simple. We studied a lot of speed of light in grade 9 high school science class. We play around with experimental equipment and we know it exist. 2) Freedom. There are 2 kinds of freedoms. There are personal freedom and national freedom. In personal freedom, it is you can do anything within the law. The frames size of laws are difference between countries. There is no such thing as unlimited freedom. National freedom means a nation is not control by any nation. For example, Taiwan's leadership is decided by the Americans before the election. Therefore , Taiwan is not an island of freedom. It is wrong that the people of Taiwan are claiming they are living with political freedom. The truth is they are not. mak
- 回復 舉報 [ 10樓 遊客 (2600:6c46:x:x:5e26) ] 發表於
- 自由個雞毛，大半夜你到芝加哥市逛一圈試試。要談自由先定義自由，自由也都有個度，得到什麼便會失去別的，擁槍自由，就造成槍支泛濫。你的自由不一定是別人的自由.
- 回復 舉報 [ 9樓 遊客 (:x:x:) ] 發表於
- 從小孩子起就一直告訴你要遵守紀律，上課要手背後，腰板要筆直，要認真聽講，不要亂講話，上課不要吃零食，等等等等。以為這個世界都是這個樣子，這才是好學生的樣子。到美國發現，完全不是這樣。夏天常見學生穿拖鞋去上學，課堂上學生可以吃零食，沒人告訴你必須聽老師講課，可以自由提出不同於課本或老師的觀點，絕沒有強迫學生背誦課文或某名人語錄之類的事情。
- 回復 舉報 [ 8樓 遊客 (67.170.x.x) ] 發表於
- 共產黨認為中國人都是天生的奴才賤民，不為他們做主他們就不知道走路的方向，所以自由不屬於中國人。中國只有一尊才是主人，以下的都是大大小小的奴才。
- 回復 舉報 [ 5樓 遊客 (70.68.x.x) ] 發表於
- 另類思考，西方國家「法律健全」限制了自由，所以要自由的呼聲比較高。相反東方國家相對法律不太健全，相對比較自由，所以就不太注意自由，而是健全法制。法制與自由是相對的。應該平衡法制與自由。