-
已有(69)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 48樓 skth178 ] 發表於
- 如果中國人團結在一起，而且有更多的人進入政治，那麼當你有資格的時候一定要登記投票。 政府官員正在挑選少數人作為替罪羊。 像非洲裔美國人這樣組織起來，他們不敢挑選他們。 所以中國人應該和其他民主黨聯合起來，讓這些政治家和官員不敢對你產生偏見。
- 回復 舉報 [ 47樓 遊客 (129.110.x.x) ] 發表於
- Heroes of the Chinese Americans! The whole family! My greatest admirations!
- 回復 舉報 [ 41樓 遊客 (108.29.x.x) ] 發表於
- 國寶銀行在紐約華人社區有口皆碑，對唐人街和法拉盛乃至其他地區的經濟發展做出了貢獻。他們勇於站出來與有偏見和歧視的「主流」勢力抗爭，值得讚賞，支持！
- 回復 舉報 [ 35樓 遊客 (100.2.x.x) ] 發表於
- It was the politically ambitious, likely liberal, procecuters who tried to gain their fames by 「squeezing the softest persimmons」. Instead, what they got were concrete blocks that they could not bite into. They did successfully extauted tens of billions from the Big guys who would rather settle than fight. After all, the real cilprits for the subprime induced GFC were the opticians who pressured banks to divide mortgages to lower income families who otherwise could not secure one. Banks then packaged the lower quality loans and sold them as securities products as banks did not want to take the risk but investors, hoping for better yields, did. Then when thing finally fell apart they went after the banks. This is similar to the tobacco cases. Buyers knew the risk but sue any way as long as the Big govermment was on their side. Notwithstanding, though, there was a few bad egg banks that purposely cheated investors. The Chinese bank in the case was not even offering subprime loans excep
- 回復 舉報 [ 32樓 遊客 (173.244.x.x) ] 發表於
- 就是扯雞巴蛋的東西，還泥馬唐人街怒了，忽悠S B呢？忘了曼哈頓的中國女人，谷開來的勝訴在美國，全特么是大忽悠。李文和違反保密協議去大陸不申報，丫心裡沒鬼才怪。
- 回復 舉報 [ 31樓 jetfighter ] 發表於
- 既然不該發生的發生了，還能去打官司，而且最後打贏了，說明你雖然出於明顯的政治目的依然拒絕承認這個制度優越，你至少不敢否認這個制度還有改正錯誤的能力，人們還可以此拍電影，並且指名道姓地批判鞭打政府犯下的這個錯誤。這一條就足夠讓你和你主子噁心很長時間了。
29樓 遊客(72.80.x.x): 不要什麼都扯上優越的民主制度。這家銀行是完完全全被冤枉的。這本來不該發生的事而發生了，這說明這個社會有問題了。