-
已有(15)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 10樓 遊客 (98.248.x.x) ] 發表於
- 哈哈，真的太天真了，真以為是天才啊？這麼簡單的容易的方法，真的別人沒想到，不會？該讀讀書了。如果啥都這麼便宜，又能把病控制在早期，進而做預防，人家還怎麼賺大把的銀子？小心擋了人家的財路，死都不知道怎麼死的。
- 回復 舉報 [ 2樓 遊客 (108.218.x.x) ] 發表於
- 又一個神話故事！看下段英文評論：The novelty of Andraka's work has also been questioned. In 2005 (seven years before Andraka won the Intel ISEF), a group of researchers at Jefferson Medical College and the University of Delaware reported a carbon-nanotube based sensor for use in breast cancer diagnostics that uses a methodology nearly identical to Andraka's purportedly novel methodology.[10][11] In addition, a carbon-nanotube based sensor similar to Andraka's was reported in 2009 by Wang et al., a group of researchers at Jiangnan University and University of Michigan,[12] and a carbon-nanotube based sensor for applications in cancer diagnosis was reported in a 2008 paper by Shao et al. that used a methodology similar to Andraka's.[13] In 2012, a "World Patent" (under the Patent Cooperation Treaty) was filed by Andraka [6] which resulted in a preliminary search to determine patentability.[14] The examination found "a lack of inventive step" [15] and prior art in US Patents 7824925 and 8