-
已有(60)人發表了評論
- 回復 舉報 [ 21樓 遊客 (99.184.x.x) ] 發表於
- 回九樓 不知為什麼兩次寫的都沒登上，只好再寫了。 中越戰爭越南不是沒有正規軍參戰，越方其中投入的正規軍里，其中有二個師是曾經在越法、越美戰爭中立過大功的。其實眾所周知、越南的民兵不比正規軍差，這在美越戰爭中是不爭的事實！更重要的是做為一個剛剛從美越戰爭中走出來的國家，積累的戰爭經驗及實際作戰人員，都比中國軍人強的多，中國軍人恐怕最多的是師一級的軍官打過仗，而戰爭支撐點是士兵！更何況中國軍隊是從最不好打仗的山區向平原推進。中國真的耍想幫助柬埔寨，會有更多的其它選擇，中越之戰更多的意義是教訓越南別太狂妄了！ 另外請您最好用中文寫，不是看不懂您那中式英文，畢竟這裡是中文網頁。謝謝！
- 回復 舉報 [ 18樓 遊客 (99.184.x.x) ] 發表於
- [quote]9樓 遊客(204.80.x.x): With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.[/q
- 回復 舉報 [ 17樓 遊客 (99.184.x.x) ] 發表於
- [quote]9樓 遊客(204.80.x.x): With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.[/q
- 回復 舉報 [ 16樓 遊客 (70.51.x.x) ] 發表於
- Interesting idea, but, it is not true and it is a bad idea. Luckily it didn't go that way. Otherwise, China would stuck in an expensive long term war with Russia and Vietnam at the same time. China also would be fighting 2 wars at 2 fronts . Eventually, China would win but, with a very heavy cost. mak
- 回復 舉報 [ 14樓 遊客 (24.7.x.x) ] 發表於
- [quote百分之七十中國人都知道朝鮮戰爭中國死幾十萬人，只有你井底蛙不知道。我對共產黨冇好感，但是沒有共產黨就沒有今日強大的中國。]4樓 遊客(184.151.x.x): 放屁[/quote]
- 回復 舉報 [ 13樓 遊客 (187.210.x.x) ] 發表於
- 啊Q正是說的你自己啊，哈哈。
3樓 遊客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自樂，朝鮮戰爭丟掉60萬志願軍的小命，中越戰爭50萬打越南30萬，最後還割地求和，把涼山等中國領土獻給越南，土共從不把真相告訴國內愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓會立馬推翻土共非法政府
- 回復 舉報 [ 11樓 遊客 (99.184.x.x) ] 發表於
- 如果越南那會兒別沒事找事的騷擾中國邊民，也就不會遞給中國這個機會。
8樓 遊客(99.121.x.x): 中國打越南唯一放不上檯面的是想支撐滅絕人性的波爾布特政權。
- 回復 舉報 [ 10樓 遊客 (24.114.x.x) ] 發表於
- 看看以前德國和日本拍的紀錄片，對中國軍隊讚賞有加。一直認為打擊了蘇聯集團。現在逢中就反的傢伙就滿嘴放屁。要知道那時柬埔寨的西哈努克親王還是北京的座上客呢。
- 回復 舉報 [ 9樓 遊客 (204.80.x.x) ] 發表於
- With a 1:1 casualty rate, yes, China could have taken the whole Vietnam with its much larger population. The question is, what was the goal? Could China have become a permanent occupation force there? I strongly doubt it. However, the Chinese with inexperienced comanders did not achieve its original strategic goal which was to force the only 4 elite devisions of the VC troops from Cambodia to relieve the pressure on the Pol Pot regime. TRhat was a bad and evil idea as the same regime that the Chinese tried to save killed 2 million of its own population. In any case, the VC did not bite the bait. It only used its local troops and militias in battling elite Chinese field armies. For the Chinese, it was a total desaster. For the young lives, they parished for no gains. The VC's reported border skimishes resumed shorly after the war was over and some of the territories that the Chinese fought and grabbed had to be returned to VC. The youngsters died in vain.
- 回復 舉報 [ 8樓 遊客 (99.121.x.x) ] 發表於
- 中國打越南唯一放不上檯面的是想支撐滅絕人性的波爾布特政權。
7樓 遊客(99.184.x.x): 戰爭是看結果而不是死亡人數！請別把這兩個觀念弄混了，中國軍人在兩周內佔據了涼山，不到三周時間就可箭指河內，能把打了幾十年仗的越南軍隊打的潰不成軍，戰爭結果不言而喻！雙方損失都很大，也正因如此、戰爭也應該是最後的選擇，因為最終受傷的還是兩國老百姓。另外、有理講理，敬請不要帶國罵回復。
- 回復 舉報 [ 7樓 遊客 (99.184.x.x) ] 發表於
- 戰爭是看結果而不是死亡人數！請別把這兩個觀念弄混了，中國軍人在兩周內佔據了涼山，不到三周時間就可箭指河內，能把打了幾十年仗的越南軍隊打的潰不成軍，戰爭結果不言而喻！雙方損失都很大，也正因如此、戰爭也應該是最後的選擇，因為最終受傷的還是兩國老百姓。另外、有理講理，敬請不要帶國罵回復。
3樓 遊客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自樂，朝鮮戰爭丟掉60萬志願軍的小命，中越戰爭50萬打越南30萬，最後還割地求和，把涼山等中國領土獻給越南，土共從不把真相告訴國內愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓會立馬推翻土共非法政府
- 回復 舉報 [ 5樓 遊客 (96.255.x.x) ] 發表於
- 鳥人，胡說八道甚！
3樓 遊客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自樂，朝鮮戰爭丟掉60萬志願軍的小命，中越戰爭50萬打越南30萬，最後還割地求和，把涼山等中國領土獻給越南，土共從不把真相告訴國內愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓會立馬推翻土共非法政府
- 回復 舉報 [ 4樓 遊客 (184.151.x.x) ] 發表於
- 放屁
3樓 遊客(198.96.x.x): 阿Q自淫自樂，朝鮮戰爭丟掉60萬志願軍的小命，中越戰爭50萬打越土共從不把真相告訴國內愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓會立馬推翻土共非法政府
- 回復 舉報 [ 3樓 遊客 (198.96.x.x) ] 發表於
- 阿Q自淫自樂，朝鮮戰爭丟掉60萬志願軍的小命，中越戰爭50萬打越南30萬，最後還割地求和，把涼山等中國領土獻給越南，土共從不把真相告訴國內愚民，一旦真相大白，老百姓會立馬推翻土共非法政府